User talk:R koiwai

== '''I am no longer editing on Wikipedia because of harassment and personal attacks from Ed6767 and User:TheImaCow. Wikipedia refuses to take action against these harrasments and protects bullies. See Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents''' ==

Refer to the harassment I was subjected to documented below. In the case of User:TheImaCow it is possible that this is a chronic problem, as they flaunt how they "fight vandalism" on their user page but it seems clear that they are over-zealous and attacking and harassing innocent editors for no reason.

Ed6767 is also participating in this harassment, see Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents.

I would like to see the harassment of me by User:TheImaCow and Ed6767 addressed by third parties, in particular Ed6767's actions on the administrator's noticeboard where he lies and makes false accusations, probably in an attempt to threaten me or get me banned.

Please look at the contributions I made before I was subjected to this harassment and ask if the disruption of my edits was done in good faith, especially considering how this disruption came AFTER I explained my edits, and how they never explained these disruptions.

I am now no longer editing articles is because I do not feel safe doing so on Wikipedia after being harassed to this degree.

May 2020
Hello, I'm Muffin of the English. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to City Shrouded in Shadow have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Muffin of the English (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC) This warning should be ignored and R koiwai has every right to remove it along with this comment. Under further analyses it was found that the reverted edit was both constructive and in good faith. I apologize for any inconvenience caused. Muffin of the English (talk)


 * My edits were to remove dubious sources which do not even get the game's title correct, and I replaced them with real sources. I also removed "this was announced" "that was announced" information under development which is irrelevant to development and is all basic information on the game that is already at the top of the article. R koiwai (talk) 18:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to City Shrouded in Shadow, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. TheImaCow (talk) 18:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to City Shrouded in Shadow, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zim Zala Bim talk 18:08, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Why did the two of you not read or reply to my comment above, or look at the article's talk page? I am trying to improve the article and your constant disruption does nothing to help. Also see User_talk:Muffin_of_the_English. R koiwai (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * For future reference See User talk:Muffin of the English where he admits to not understanding the topic and agreeing to no longer edit the article, and Talk:Kyoei Toshi. User:ZimZalaBim also agreed to leave the article alone on User talk:ZimZalaBim. User:TheImaCow however lacks the basic common decency to give a straight answer to anything at all. User:TheImaCow also attacked me, accusing me on vandalism on User_talk:Muffin_of_the_English, AFTER my comments there starting the discussion which led to User:Muffin of the English admitting to his fault in the matter. I suspect that he is also meatpuppeting given the convenient timing of other people attacking me immediately after him: The article had seen almost no activity before but immediately after I started editing I started having my edits reverted by multiple people in a short amount of time, also see the comments on his talk page and here from User:Ed6767 who was never involved in the article hounding me. And please look at the contributions I made before I was attacked and see if they were ever justified in their reverts and accusations to begin with. This whole affair has left me very sick and I am leaving this comment here to make it clear that I am leaving because of this harassment. R koiwai (talk) 02:25, 15 May 2020 (UTC)


 * See Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents where it was confirmed by an administrator that these warning were unwarranted. R koiwai (talk) 02:25, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Reminder: Be civil
Please, please, be civil. You have been treating reverts like personal attacks when often this really isn't the case. Editors are human too, so please be civil. Ed6767 (talk) 15:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * See Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents where it was confirmed by an administrator that this warning was unwarranted, and where I list cases of how Ed6767 was performing personal attacks and harassment on me. R koiwai (talk) 02:25, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It was never about the reverts. I discussed the reverts byUser:Muffin_of_the_English with them and we settled it easily. The other two continued disrupting my edits AFTER I asked for them to discuss my edits, and their ignoring my response can be seen clearly higher on this talk page. User:TheImaCow also attacked me, accusing me of vandalism on User_talk:Muffin_of_the_English, AFTER my comments there starting the discussion which led to User:Muffin of the English admitting to his fault in the matter. Your accusations are just as inflammatory as User:TheImaCow's. R koiwai (talk) 15:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * User:TheImaCow tried to resolve the situation but you didn't respond to their questions clearly and you accused them of all these things uncivilly and did not assume good faith, so please be civil in the future. Ed6767 (talk) 15:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I answered the question immediately and they ignored it and asked again. I also responded directly to the accusation on English Muffin's talk page which was also ignored. This is clearly bad faith, just like your accusations are. R koiwai (talk) 15:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure, if you say so. Ed6767 (talk) 15:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The other two who reverted my edits admitted to fault and agreed to stop disrupting. When I tried to engage with User:TheImaCow he refused to admit fault and I somehow ended up being hounded by you, somehow who was never involved in the article, instead. R koiwai (talk) 15:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Jeez dude, just be civil. You've already accused an admin and loads of other editors of being disruptive. I'm really not sure you want out of this. Ed6767 (talk) 15:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Please don't use personal attacks, being called a meat puppet is not appreciated. I exited the discussion due to me not being able to contribute at a high level with the topic Japanese video games. Muffin of the English (talk)
 * That was not referring to you. R koiwai (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Administrator Noticeboard Discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Ed6767 (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I would like to note that Ed6767's accusations on Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents were blatant lies that are refuted on that noticeboard, and that it was confirmed by an administrator that their accusations and warnings were unwarranted. R koiwai (talk) 02:25, 15 May 2020 (UTC)