User talk:Raúl Quintana Tarufetti

Welcome Raúl Quintana Tarufetti! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are registered editors!

Hello Raúl Quintana Tarufetti. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Walter Görlitz, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Walter_G%C3%B6rlitz&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Raúl,

I've taken a look at the articles you mentioned and the revversions by you and the other user are multiple so this turns a bit confusing for an editor who has not been involved in the discussion since it started.

Nevertheless Svarter is right when he states that the RSSSF (see page) is a reliable and good source, but it is updated up to 2008 so there are a lot of years missing. The FIFA source indicates 42 wins per side as of Nov 2023. The same result than Promiedos, another good site about statistics. The website Goal.com also indicates a 42-42 tie on wins.

As a result, I'm going to edit the page based on the sources cited. If Svartner reverts my edit, I'll open a discussion at his talk page and, if he does not change his attitude, I won't have any other option than reporting the case at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If I have to do it, I'll notify you asking for your feedback.

Best regards, Fma12 (talk) 10:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Onorem (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brazil national football team records and statistics.  Rah ' io ' 1234  08:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * RE: Your message on my page. You are both edit warring. Look at Dispute resolution. I have no interest in this topic. --Onorem (talk) 21:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * A note for both you and, Look at WP:VANDAL and stop saying other users involved in a content dispute are vandalizing. --Onorem (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Onorem (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Argentina–Brazil football rivalry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * They didn't revert again after being warned. You did. That's why you were reported. I assume the administrator who reviewed my report looked at the history. --Onorem (talk) 23:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Ok, but it´s not necessary to be reported to be blocked for violateing one rule. And he violated one too, clarely: in march and in may, as I demonstrated in this post avobe. Ok, I will wait this week and I will return with more knowledge about the functioning of the english wikipedia. I will continue with the spanish one a few minutes a day, where I don´t have problems. Happily I can live without this wikipedia. --Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * 331dot: Ok. I only wanted to say that the block was partial and in a point unfair because the edit war was started by Svartner and no one participated to try to solve the principal issue: the sources and the frequent reversals the user Svartner did. If I was blocked, the other user (who started the edit war) deserved to be blocked too. I stop it now here, because I don´t want to aggravate this issue with another technicality typical of Wikipedia. End of this for me. --Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (talk) 23:11, 11 May 2024 (UTC)


 * 331dot and Onorem: please, see the user Svartner continues reverting now today in the article Argentina–Brazil football rivalry, with no consensus, doing the same he did in march and in may, trying to impose his own point of view. He did it today. Look  Regards, --Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (talk) 23:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Svartner (talk) 21:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rosario Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Rodríguez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * 1989 Copa América
 * added a link pointing to 1970 World Cup
 * Brazil national football team
 * added a link pointing to 1970 World Cup

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)