User talk:Raúl Santos Cajo

Welcome!
Hello, Raúl Santos Cajo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Murph 9000 (talk) 10:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Infobox logo size
Hi. Please stop setting the size of logos in infoboxes to 300px or 320px. This makes the entire infobox annoyingly wide for people using a narrower (e.g. 750–1000px) window, where it takes up an obnoxious proportion of the window. Although it may look good in a landscape orientation window on a HD display, it does not look good on all devices and actually looks bad on some lower resolution devices and situations where people use portrait orientation windows on a HD display. It is better to have no size specified, so that it is based on user preferences. In individual cases where the default 220px size is actually a problem, it should generally be set to no larger than 250px, to avoid bloating the entire infobox. There are always exceptions, but you seem to be going through many articles and setting unreasonably large fixed sizes based only on what looks good for your particular computing environment. If you want larger logos and thumbnails in general, for your personal viewing, please configure that in your user preferences. Thanks for your cooperation. Murph 9000 (talk) 10:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Again, please don't do this without good reason, and use "upright=" rather than pixel size per WP:IMAGESIZE. I've just reverted you setting a movie infobox image to 320px when the original image itself was only 260px wide. --McGeddon (talk) 08:50, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Please always supply an edit summary
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Murph 9000 (talk) 10:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Tom and Jerry: The Movie, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop setting movie infobox images to be larger than the original image being displayed. McGeddon (talk) 10:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ''Stop setting infobox images to a large fixed size that you seem to think looks good. It does not look good for everyone. Their size should be unspecified, as you have been told repeatedly, so that they are based on user preferences, and everyone can choose the size which works best for them. Forcing the images to be abnormally and obnoxiously large is harmful to the viewing experience for many people. STOP!'' Murph 9000  (talk) 03:10, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tooncast. Murph 9000 (talk) 11:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 15:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, with no attempt to respond to messages expressing concern about your editing. At present, the block is set to last for 3 days, but it can be removed before then if you can indicate that you understand the reason for the block, and will not continue to edit in ways that are contrary to consensus, without any explanation. Wikipedia works by editors cooperating, not by each individual editor doing what he or she likes and ignoring whatever anyone else says. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mr. Bean (animated TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Your continued failure to respond to reasonable messages expressing concern about your edits is a serious problem. We have explained repeatedly that your changes to image sizes are disruptive, but you have not responded to any of our messages, and continue to disrupt Wikipedia. STOP!'' Murph 9000  (talk) 04:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Closedmouth (talk) 13:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)