User talk:Ra-raisch

Math formatting
Hi Ra-raisch, and (a late) welcome to Wikipedia. I saw your thread over at User talk:Cuzkatzimhut and in one or another spot. I'd just like to hint that it is recommended to format mathematical formulas, either using Tex or using HTML. This is for readability. Of course, it isn't set in stone for talk pages, but you may lose a percentage of your audience (they might think "oh, this guy probably doesn't have a clue" and walk away without having read at all) if you don't follow this practice. YohanN7 (talk) 12:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


 * thanks, I know, but it's a bit awkward for short texts. Ra-raisch (talk) 15:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


 * You can also just use italics (and proper spacing), i.e a = b instead of a=b. It is quick enough. I want to emphasize that I am not nitpicking. I was serious about "losing one's audience". YohanN7 (talk) 07:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * oh, I must say, I don't usually bother about italics, thanks for this hint, I was mostly bothered about subscripts. Ra-raisch (talk) 08:00, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

A useful venue
Welcome from me too. A "forum" style site, where one asks and discusses questions of substance--not editorial WP issues, is this one. Not really steering you to it, but people ask lots of questions for community input... Just  a thought... Cuzkatzimhut (talk) 16:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I don't usually ask questions apart from editing a page, I'm not interested in a forum. It is just that g' is nowhere declared as strong charge and g is multiused. In the end I was more or less guessing. It is really a pity, the explanations are so short on some pages not even declaring the symbols used, often using different symbols for the same quantity, using different systems... That is exactly where I try to improve the text, as far as I can understand it. If I ask a question, this is supposed to be a hint for improving readability of the page for the avarage user. Ra-raisch (talk) 17:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)