User talk:RaCJ1325

Welcome!
Hi RaCJ1325! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Tarheel95 (Talk) 19:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AP World History: Ancient


A tag has been placed on AP World History: Ancient requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Gjs238 (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The 39 Clues characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tidal wave.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, I'm General Ization. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pentatonix without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  General Ization Talk  05:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I was in a hurry and I apologize for not describing my edit. RaCJ1325 (talk) 05:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * To respond to your comment: It should be unnecessary, but you're apparently giving other Wikipedia editors too much credit. The hidden notes are there because there is a history of other editors repeatedly changing the members' vocal ranges to something other than the consensus. The notes explain the consensus. To assume that these editors will follow a link to review a "reference justifying what the invisible text is explaining" is also quite generous, but probably too much so. The editors I'm referring to have not been interested in opinions other than their own about the members' vocal ranges.  General Ization Talk  05:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I thought the classifications of the members' vocal ranges was a bit off. However, I didn't think the same invisible comment needed to be present twice. It seems the user who initially made the edit was frequently challenged by other uses changing it, prompting them to overzealously defend their edit with unnecessary additional invisible comments. RaCJ1325 (talk) 17:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Something Wicked This Way Comes


A tag has been placed on Something Wicked This Way Comes, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I agree I asked for the page to be deleted. It was published accidentally from my sandbox and was never meant to be published.RaCJ1325 (talk) 23:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)