User talk:RaNK001

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Zach Vega (talk to me) 11:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 17:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hirakud Expr concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hirakud Expr, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:40, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Hirakud Expr


Hello RaNK001. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Hirakud Expr.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

India-Netherlands relations
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of India-Netherlands relations, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.government.nl/issues/international-relations/india.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 * It turns out this source is in the public domain, so there's no big problem, but next time please cite your sources. I noticed you also copy-pasted parts of Dutch India without showing attribution (or fixing the wiki-syntax, for that matter). Please refer to WP:COPYWITHIN: you have to attribute material to its original author. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 13:45, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2016
 News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia
 * News and notes: AffCom still grappling with WMF Board's criteria for new chapters


 * Special report: Olympics readership depended on language


 * In the media: Librarians, Wikipedians, and a library of Wikipedia coverage


 * WikiProject report: Watching Wikipedia


 * Featured content: Entertainment, sport, and something else in-between


 * Traffic report: From Phelps to Bolt to Reddit


 * Technology report: Wikimedia mobile sites now don't load images if the user doesn't see them


 * Recent research: One study encounters critique of its ethics from Wikipedians; another critiques the ethics employed by Wikipedia


 * Blog: Upload of free photos from Swiss library underway

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 16:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Karna, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Moved text from my talk page to here per request at the top of my talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 02:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello Jim,
 * First of all, the things that I have edited are mentioned in the Mahabharata itself. For reference they are available in the BORI critical edition and also in the KMG version of the Mahabharata. Therefore I didn't think it was necessary to mention the source of my edits again because the source is already mentioned there in the page itself. If you don't believe me please give them a read.
 * Currently the page contains information like, "Karna couldn't string the bow in Draupadi's swayamvar. He failed like many other suitors." I would like to know the source of this information. It is clearly mentioned in Mahabharata that Karna was able to string the bow and was about to hit the release when Draupadi stopped him and barred him from firing the arrow because he was born in a low caste. There are several versions of Mahabharata but none has ever mentioned the failure of Karna in Draupadi swayamvar.


 * Brother, everyone looks for true and unbiased information on Wikipedia but reverting my edits on the page "Karna" this page now looks like a very page with very biased information. There are several grammatical mistakes in the page too now. The information it contains is also very different from that present in the source of the information in the page.


 * I think you're not from India. If you are please forgive me. Nowadays there has been a lot of heated arguments among Arjuna and Karna fans in India. It seems apparently that some ardent Arjuna fan has edited the page, which previously contained very unbiased and neutral information into a biased page with a lot of wrong information some four to five months ago.
 * I would like to have my edits restored in the page with all due respect. The sources of them, as I have said already are mentioned in the page. "KMG Mahabharata" and "BORI critical edition" of Mahabharata. Please restore my edits or let me do the same and please don't change them again.


 * Regards Anshuman. Anshu 02:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RaNK001 (talk • contribs)


 * Per the top of my talk page User talk:Jim1138, please keep the conversation on one page.
 * Your addition: "Some sources claim that he was an Atimaharathi class warrior." Is a dead giveaway that some of your content is unsourced. Such a conclusion, if yours, is wp:original research and should not be used. Simply stating "it's in the book" is insufficient. The only credibility that Wikipedia has is that it is wp:verifiable. i.e. detailed citations: wp:cite a wp:reliable source. See help:footnotes and wp:referencing for beginners. Please supply a page number for the content you added. There are tricks to adding a common book with multiple page numbers. All edits are saved in the wp:page history. You need to clarify references for your content. Please use wp:notifications with your reply. Beware, it is a bit tricky. Jim1138 (talk) 02:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, when citing a book, please use an ISBN or ASIN so people can easily find a copy. This may be necessary if different printings have different pages associated with the citation. Jim1138 (talk) 02:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)