User talk:RaNdOm26/Archive 1

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * Community Portal
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Manual of Style
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Picture tutorial

I hope you will enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! You can sign your name on talk and voting pages using four tildes, (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;), which produces your username, the time, and the date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- getcrunk   juice  contribs 16:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Lee Harding. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. CynicalMe 06:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

I didn't write any nonsense **frowns**.

Welcome and a few things
First, welcome to Wikipedia. You should consider joining the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject, seeing as you like to edit Australian cyclones (which we need help with). For images, generally you shouldn't use a search engine, unless you know what you're looking for. As a rule of thumb, most images whose urls end in .gov or .mil are public domain or at least fair use. You should double check to see who took the image or picture before going ahead. If it is public domain, you should upload it to Wikipedia Commons, once you get an account there. This is how you upload it. Right click on the Public Domain image, and click "Save Picture as", and name it whatever. Click on the upload icon on the Commons page, and follow the directions given at the top (description, source, date, author, and permission). Inline sourcing is giving the source for the information you added to the article. At the every source you have, do something like this. I hope that made a little sense. Just add in everything. Hopefully that all makes sense. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 13:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Very glad to hear that. We always love having new members. Good luck with any future plans you have. I hope you're able to work on some southern hemisphere storms or seasons. That is one area of the WPTC that needs some work. See you around! Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Hi
I put the comments in the talk page. The reason you didn't get the newsletter is because you didn't join the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject. If you put your name in the participants list, you'll get one each month. --Hurricanehink ( talk ) 13:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Very nice, and welcome to the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject! We're looking forward to any future edits you can make to tropical cyclones, and we're happy to have you on board. Current projects include bettering the existing articles on retired hurricanes to GA or FA status. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Here's the latest version of our monthly newsletter. Enjoy!

Here's some pointers to making a good tropical cyclone article.

See you around. --Hurricanehink ( talk ) 13:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Track maps
Glad you like them! I do have some BoM raw data and am trying to figure out how to interpret it at the moment, it would be much better to use BoM data instead of the JTWC. The BoM track for Steve shows things differently to the JTWC, for instance the fact the storm reached the Bight instead of dissipating overland. On the colouration, I think the track maps should show sustained winds (and so the US scale), as they need to allow global comparison. That's why the SSHS category determines the colour in the infobox.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Ele and Huko have now had their track maps updated.--Nilfanion (talk) 18:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * And that's that lot done. Marcia doesn't have one as the JTWC didn't actually track that system. Could you finish off the South Pacific storm summaries in that article? And no problem glad you appreciate :)--Nilfanion (talk) 23:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #3
The August issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: MOTM
Thanks! By the way, great job with the 1999-2000 Southern Hemisphere season. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Hellooooo!!!!!


I think the only good sources I am aware of online are Gary Padgett's summaries and the BoM. However, the JTWC ATCRs starting in 1985 also provide information. (The pertinent chapter is typically the one after the one marked "LARGE". However, if you activate your email and send me an email, I can then send you a copy of Jack Beven's weekly summaries for 1991-95.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

WP:CIV, WP:OWN
Re this edit summarry, please be civil. No one owns articles, and anyone is free to edit. Chacor 16:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Chacor, check your spelling, will you? RaNdOm26 15:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Again. WP:CIV, or you may be liable for a block. Chacor 15:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I am not very concerned about being blocked because Wikipedia is not my priority, I am more concerned about whether I feel happy about contributing to Wikipedia or not. I don't like working in an unfriendly environment. RaNdOm26 15:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You are very welcome to fork or leave, actually. If you really want to work in a friendly environment you should help make it friendlier, not make it worse. Chacor 15:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

If that's so, I guess I shouldn't be talking to you anymore, since I can't get along with you anymore. RaNdOm26 15:44, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * If I am making a lot of edits to an article, which results in an edit conflict, what are you supposed to do about preventing any edit conflicts, since they are definitely a real pain. RaNdOm26 08:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The best thing to do is to add inuse to the article while you are doing major work.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

ACE
Formula for ACE is windspeed in knots, divided by 1000, then squared. Therefore 40 knots = (40/1000)*(40/1000) = 0.4*0.4 = 0.16. Unit is 104kt2. Only works with full 1-minute six-hourly advisories. Chacor 09:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, it would be divided by 100, then squared. The other numbers above are correct, just replace 1000 with 100. So 40 knots = (40/100)*(40/100) = 0.4*0.4 = 0.16. Also, the figured is generally given in 3 significant figures. --Ajm81 13:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, heh, was busy working on an article for Kyle (2002). Chacor 13:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see, thanks for that, Ajm81! RaNdOm26 09:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

IRC
Hey, if you're there, could you go on the WPTC's IRC? Just go to http://www.ircatwork.com/ and type in a nickname (your username would be good), then type in "#wiki-hurricanes" in the box that says channel next to it. Hope to see you there; I'm really bored. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 12:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Can you go on now? íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 01:08, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Chart websites
Hello! The website for Billboard charts is http://billboard.com/bbcom/charts/genre_index.jsp and the Canadian charts are physical singles airplay. This is the UK singles chart website. I'd advise to not use the poorly-maintained sites because they often have incorrect positions. :-) &mdash; getcrunk   what?!  23:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Hello
Thanks, not too much sunburn. :P--Nilfanion (talk) 15:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Edit count
Here you go. http://tools.wikimedia.de/~essjay/edit_count/Count.php

TC summaries
Unfortunately that gap is real. Jack Beven stopped producing the reports in 1996, under the increasing strain of his job at the NHC (presumably). Gary Padgett initiated the weekly summaries a year or so later; there were no summaries for the intervening period.--Nilfanion (talk) 13:14, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

UTC+8
Singapore. – Chacor 15:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No, you didn't sound racist. Yes, born and bred. Not a foreigner. – Chacor 15:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * See the article, English is an official language and is the working and teaching language. However, most (I'd say about 70%) Singaporeans have weak English. I just happen to be one of the 30% I guess. :P – Chacor 15:53, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Due to certain reasons that is no longer made known, I'll say that I'm not older than 18. – Chacor 16:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I've grown up speaking English mostly, although I speak both. – Chacor 16:18, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm older than 15. – Chacor 16:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #4
The September issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Sources for Music charts
If I seem "very picky", it's because Verifiability is official Wikipedia policy. The websites allmusic.com and billboard.com have U.S. chart positions (allmusic has some Canadian ones as well), and musicsquare.net and top40-charts.com have worldwide chart info, although I don't think top40-charts.com is very reliable. That said, I hope you are only going to use those links to provide peak positions, because I strongly discourage the inclusion of chart trajectories in articles. Readers of an encyclopedia will not need to know exactly how a song performed week-by-week on the charts. If a single's chart run was particularly long or short, then the text can be expanded to reflect that, but we should try to avoid turning articles into marketing report/scorecard-like overviews of singles' respective performances. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of info. Extraordinary Machine 16:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Because many editors choose to simply restore them, often without explanation and almost always without citing sources. In some cases this leads to edit wars, and you can imagine the controversy this would cause if every trajectory was removed from every article. I don't think there are enough editors willing to discuss the issue to be able to form any sort of guideline, so for the moment the problem (as I see it) is growing and growing. Extraordinary Machine 19:49, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Just an addition, I would say that including every chart trajectory in the biographical section of the article is redundant since the information is already the discography section. However, some of the chart trajectory information could be included when discussing the artist's greatest hits (i.e. their #1 singles).

Re: Australians
That's a good question. As far as I know, you're the only one, though you're the only one I remember saying it. I only know a few user's locations, and to make you feel better, NSLE/Chacor is from Singapore and Nilfanion is from the United Kingdom. I think both of them are the only WPTC users from their respective countries, so I'm sure they know how you feel. Thanks for the heads up; I'll archive it. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Now, now, Hink, that's very inaccurate. There are a lot of UK WPTC users, and I know of at least one other WPTC user in Singapore. That said, no, you're not the only Australian within WPTC, but you are the only ACTIVE one that I know of. – Chacor 10:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Really? Wow, you learn something new everyday. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 14:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * That's great. I don't need to know if there are people or not in "WPTC", I'm more interested in THE people themselves. So far, I've found none. RaNdOm26 13:18, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * One other Singaporean user. Interesting, how come you are so afraid of mentioning that person's name? Don't you acknowledge people? Or is that user you're mentioning NSLE???? RaNdOm26 13:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia policy. And FYI I am NSLE. – Chacor 14:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * LOL - "FYI", calm down. RaNdOm26 15:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edits
You recent additions of fact to 2006 Pacific typhoon season have been disruptive - the Ioke stuff is all in its subarticle, sofixit - cite them yourself, while the other one re. named storms is in plain sight. Go look it up yourself - all published records of the 2000 through 2005 PTSes will say exactly how many storms were disagreed on. – Chacor 10:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It is not original research if it has been published. Have a look at Gary Padgett's yearly summaries - . – Chacor 10:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If it makes you happier I've added the six sources. – Chacor 10:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * WP:POINT = disruption of Wikipedia to make a point, which you clearly were doing. You wanted to make a point - which in itself isn't disruption - but you did it in a way that harmed the encyclopedia. – Chacor 10:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * To clarify further - the disruptiveness was about Ioke, as sources already were in its own article and it was a mere matter of taking the sources from there and transferring it over, which you did not do. – Chacor 10:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Who's the one talking about etiquette here? You come in from absolutely NOWHERE and make these edits, quite frankly, disruptive when it's stood for so long. Is this retaliation for me tagging some of your articles? Sheesh. – Chacor 12:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * And, "not easy"? The first place you should think of is the tropical cyclone archives. Hardly difficult to find. – Chacor 12:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * In this sense, your articles meaning articles you created. Anyhow, let's just drop the matter, bickering isn't conducive for the encyclopedia. – Chacor 12:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

That isn't necessarily how we work. Criticism only helps the project grow. "Treat others how you want to be treated" really doesn't work on Wikipedia. Anyhow, like I said, let's get back to encyclopedia-writing. – Chacor 13:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * How, exactly was this incivil? I have reverted your message to my talk page for WP:RPA purposes. Please do not make wild accusations on my talk page. – Chacor 09:03, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Please avoid my talk page if all you are going to do is troll, otherwise I shall request an admin to look into possible harassment. – Chacor 09:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey/Sorry/Star
Look, I'm sorry if I was a bit snappy. Let's put that behind, okay? I've looked through your recent contribs, and I think you deserve this. – Chacor 10:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * A bit snappy???????? Is that all you're saying? GEEZ. RaNdOm26 02:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Deal or No Deal (Australian Game Show)
Hi there

In reference to Deal or No Deal's unluckiest player ever, I maintain that the first offer was in fact 10c, not 22c. In fact on the website www.mediaspy.org they have a forum on television programmes which has a picture of that particular offer, and it clearly says 10c.

Re: Charts or no charts......
Sorry for the late reply. The chart trajectories issue has been discussed several times before; see, for example, Requests for comment/Pop music issues and the archive of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Tables for charts. Though it may seem like it, I'm not an individual with a bee in my bonnet for no reason about this. Extraordinary Machine 18:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Hello
It might be fine, seeing as we are much more liberal towards new articles then we were in the past. Be sure the storm history is nice and long (given the long duration of the storm), and try and find some records for the storm. It was the 7th longest lasting Atlantic tropical cyclone of all time, per the list of notable Atlantic hurricanes. BTW, look through the NHC archive to see if there's any more info than what's in the TCR (discussions especially, though check the public advisories to see if it caused heavy surf). Before you publish it or "go live", you should consider getting some more satellite images for the article; one of it at its secondary peak while looping would be cool. Good luck with the article. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:03, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Padgett/JMA
Padgett uses JTWC over JMA in the sense that track positions of cyclones are mainly JTWC positions. He does, indeed however recognise JMA windspeeds. – Chacor 14:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #5
The October issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:Hi
Hey, sorry mate, I put in the numbers earlier, and before, I checked both the physical singles chart and the singles chart, and there was no difference. So..do you know which chart we're meant to use? Sorry if I've inconvenienced you, it's just that ARIA didn't update it yet when I got to the site. ~ E  meZxX  12:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Sweet! íslenskur fel]] lib ylur #12 (samtal) 12:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Umm..I kinda know what you're saying..but I bookmarked the ARIA singles before they cut it into physical singles and singles, and the chart we used before was physical singles...so kinda not sure what to do now. =/ ~ E  meZxX  12:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Esperanza!
Welcome, RaNdOm26, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is Stressbusters, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Natalya by email or talk page. Consider introducing yourself at the Esperanza talk page! Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!

Sasuk e  -kun  27  15:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

I'd also like to extend a warm welcome to you. If you have any questions or need any help, don't hesitate to give me a buzz on my talk page. Welcome, and enjoy the community! -- Ci e lomobile talk / contribs 15:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, i'm not very sure wich one to used either. I didn't know it existed until i double checked the website. It seems that all other chart websites are just using the Physical top 50, i'm really confused too. I'm going to used Physical at the moment, i think its the one when downloads are included as well. Lillygirl 23:14, 8 October 2006.
 * I was thinking that when the Chartifacts update, we will then know what chart to use maybe, because ARIA will be using those positions of either Singles or Physical Sinlges. Lillygirl 22:48, October 9 2006.
 * Good idea, I checked it out now, they've updated. We're going with the singles charts. ~ E  meZxX  03:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Chess
Esperanza/Coffee Lounge/Chess.  •S  e  an•gorter•  (T) (P) 16:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Australian Idol "Instrumental" week
Hi RaNdOm26, I've left a message on the talk-page of Dean Geyer relating to the change you just made (it's more appropriate that it be discussed there instead of here on your talk-page). I'd be great if you could have a look and offer some input. Thanks. Cnwb 11:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

You just missed him...
You were looking for other WPTC Australian users? User:Gertzy was a member of the project and was from Australia, but just left on October 7th. Sorry, you just missed him. →Cycl  one1 → 22:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Lol. That's bizarre. Just thought I'd let you know in case you didn't. →Cycl   one1 → 12:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Newspaper Archive
The newspaper archive is great for info. I mainly use it for Atlantic storms, and most of the impact info from the 1933 Atlantic hurricane season was obtained from the newspapers. In fact, several times there will be next to no info online, but there will be some really good info from np's. It goes from about 1800 to 2006, and does cover a bit EPAC and WPAC (didn't check elsewhere). It covers storm history occassionally (though not terribly good due to changes in post-analysis), preparations, impact, and aftermath sometimes. I believe it is a great source of info. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 14:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Moving pages
Please do not move the pages, as I am opposed to the idea and nobody else has commented yet. Please wait. jd || talk || 08:54, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Your signature
Hello,. If you would like a signature like mine, be sure to visit Sean gorter at his signature shop.  S r g s p     04:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #6
The November issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:13, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: NCDC
Well, you start by going to the main page. Then, you select the state. For your example, you would pick Puerto Rico. Specify the time period you want, and select all events (not all TC impacts are listed under hurricanes). Then, browse through to see the reports you want. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it's just U.S. and U.S. territories. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Future articles
Just a heads up, you would probably have more luck writing a decent article on Beryl than you would on Florence. Beryl did cause some damage and deaths (I think), and it made landfall. Florence was a fish storm that did little, although you did do a good job on Tropical Storm Otto (2004), which was a fish storm that did little. Good luck with whichever you do. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 15:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Here's some Florence links that might help get you started. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 15:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Bermuda effects
 * Some more Bermuda effects
 * Also the TCR and the advisories


 * No problem, it took just a second. Now Beryl, I know there's info on it, but I'm not sure how much it will help you. There's a lot of spanish sources that have great info, but unless you can read spanish it's a huge pain to look through. For example, here's the Mexican Meteorology Website's report on Beryl, which gives the rainfall peak. Most other sources will be like that, in that they give small bits of good info in Spanish. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 14:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Jello ... about so fresh
Hey =] i was wondering if it was okay that i kinda like STOLE thing fgor the so fresh site HAHA it was my first site i made-ified =)... au revoir Bitbitz.xx 07:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

CD covers and fair use
This is a policy which is applied widely on Wikipedia, and outlined in albumcover which states that CV covers are fair use "solely to illustrate the audio recording in question." Thus, this doesn't apply to a biography on a singer, but can be used in a table to mention the CD, as happens here. I hope this explanation helps. Harr o 5 07:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Australian cyclones and disambigs
Hey Random, could you help add Australian and South Pacific cyclones to our disambiguation pages? A lot of them don't cover names used in SHem (in fact only recently were John and Paul's disambiguation pages updated for the SHem storms). Could you have a look at some random hurricane disambigs we have and see if any are missing any SHem storms from them? (P.S. if a disambig is at "Hurricane" or "Typhoon" and there's been a previous Shem cyclone you'll need to ask an admin to move it to a "Tropical Storm" prefix.) Thanks. – Chacor 12:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * OK. I'll see what I can do. RaNdOm26 02:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject western australia
Please join the WikiProject Western Australia and bring another perspective to the emerging goals and discussions. Found you at WA wikipedian page. Please tell three people you think might interested. Fred.e 11:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #7
After a long hiatus on my part, the December issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

2000 AHS
I see you created Alberto and Beryl of 2000 and considered doing Florence. I hope you don't mind me asking, but is that season a project of yours? I'm just curious, but if you need any help with links or info, give me a yell. I'm in the process of finishing 2003 AHS as my own project, and I know how much work it takes to do an entire season. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 21:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh, cool. What storms in the 2000 PHS did you plan on making articles for? Carlotta and Daniel seem to be the best candidates. Remember the site where you found Beryl's damage total? That same site has damage info for some of the 2000 PHS storms that affected Mexico. Storm05 created Hurricane Lane (2000) a while back. It was a good start, and I'm sure with some more info it could be remade. Here's some impact/preps for Carlotta, and don't forget about the TCR (18 deaths due to a freighter sinking). This site says the hurricane directly affected about 10,000 people and killed eight in Mexico, which is odd because I never saw that elsewhere. That might be something to look into. CPAC summary for Daniel indicates the storm caused some impact on Hawaii, but not much. That might be a difficult article to write. Well, whatever you do, have fun and good luck. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 06:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * You still need that info for the storm sections... Generally, the format for a season article has a storm section having two (or more paragraphs) - one with storm history and one with impact. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)