User talk:Raaj Tilak/Archive 1

br>

Welcome!
Hello, Harsh.kumar.srk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Vats (clan) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:35, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Your favorite is also Jurassic Park? Nice to know. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:54, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Agrasen, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 02:39, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, like you did in the article Buddy4Study. Wikipedia is not a trade directory. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you.  CatcherStorm    talk   09:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Harsh.kumar.srk. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanjeev Barnwal


A tag has been placed on Sanjeev Barnwal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Celestina007 (talk) 13:44, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Sanjeev Barnwal moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Sanjeev Barnwal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  15:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Barnwal (February 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Barnwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjeev Barnwal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sanjeev_Barnwal Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sanjeev_Barnwal reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of SP Guide Publications


The page SP Guide Publications has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 331dot (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The page SP Guide Publications is not my company or I am not the owner of this company. This is the information company that publish books and magazines for public. My aim is not to advertise any company. So, I will request you to don't delete SP Guide Publications page --(Harsh Barnwal 11:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC))

Speedy deletion nomination of Shri Sukhdeo Prasad Baranwal


A tag has been placed on Shri Sukhdeo Prasad Baranwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://spguidepublications.com/founder/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  14:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kapila, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 16:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Adding caste in BLPs
Please only add caste-related details in BLPs if the subjects self-identify with it – see here for the relevant details. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:41, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

DS alert
- NitinMlk (talk) 19:45, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert notice

 * In spite of my previous comment here, you again introduced caste-related details in two BLPs with this and this edit. I repeat again that please do not add caste-related details in BLPs unless they self-identify with it – see here for the relevant details. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey there, NitinMlk, you say that I am introduced caste-related details in two BLPs. I am not interested in adding information about a person's caste on Wikipedia. I am adding some information about that person's family. There are many articles on Wikipedia that contain information related to caste. like- Arvind Kejriwal, Bharatendu Harishchandra, Bhagwan Das etc. I request you not to remove any BLPs family detail. Thanks - Harsh.kumar.srk (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note that caste needs to be self-identified in the case of a BLP (Biography of a 'Living' Person). Kejriwal (a living person) in the linked source clearly identified as an Agarwal. The other two are dead. For them, reliable, preferably WP:HISTRS compliant sources are required. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:37, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * @Fylindfotberserk, Bro If you think both of the people are dead than you are wrong And it seems to me that you did not see my change, that I had put a linked source in both of the BLPs. If you want, you can see that source again this for Satyadev Prasad and this for Somnath Bharti. Thanks ☮️ - Harsh.kumar.srk (talk) 04:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I was referring to your examples Arvind Kejriwal, Bharatendu Harishchandra, Bhagwan Das, of which the latter two are dead, and in Kejriwal's case, it is supported by a source where he self-identifies his caste. As for the changes you made, they are wrong since these two people didn't self-identify their caste in those sources. However, बरनवाल is mentioned as part of Satyadev Prasad's full name, which is a different thing. It seems a few Hindi sources mention his full name as Satyadev Prasad Baranwal. That however, doesn't prove his caste or community. Example, Kushal Punjabi is not a "Punjabi" but a "Sindhi". - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , thanks for guiding them. BTW, for some reason, I didn't receive their ping. - NitinMlk (talk) 11:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't mention it . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of gotras, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NitinMlk (talk) 11:39, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You have been adding a lot of unsourced or poorly sourced content in the caste-related articles. Please do not add any more content without citing reliable source(s). BTW, see User:Sitush/CasteSources to know regarding the unreliable sources. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 11:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Hi, once a speedy deletion has been declined by an admin or uninvolved editor it should not be added again. Also, please read WP:CSD as some of your nominations are incorrect, regards Atlantic306 (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Barnwal (March 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Barnwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjeev Barnwal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sanjeev_Barnwal Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sanjeev_Barnwal reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jagdish Prasad Baranwal


A tag has been placed on Jagdish Prasad Baranwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Jai49 (talk) 11:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Jagdish Prasad Baranwal. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MrClog (talk) 13:39, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Citing your sources
Please see WP:V and WP:RS. You need to cite reliable sources if you are adding any content to Wikipedia. You have already been given 5+ warnings about this -- the next time you add unsourced content, you will be blocked. utcursch &#124; talk 00:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Do not add list of people in the Baranwal caste article without sources in which the subjects self-identify their caste. This si as per consensus. I believe I explained that to you before. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Baranwal, you may be blocked from editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * @Fylindfotberserk, You said I will not added any citation source. but, I will added a source in that page. You can check again in view history. --Raaj Tilak (talk) 15:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)


 * You added citations for 2 entries only. And in none of those the subjects self-identified their caste. See this consensus. There are many consensuses like this. According to which caste needs to be self-identified. Kindly go through this too. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)


 * If you are so keen on adding their names, you can start another article, something like "List of people with surname Baranwal". Since that will be dealing with surnames only, you will be free to add all notable persons with the surname Barnwal. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for guiding again. but I have one more question is "Can I add that two people names who's surname is different but caste is same: Satyadev Prasad and Somnath Bharti". --Raaj Tilak (talk) 15:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)


 * If their legal name ends with Baranwal, then you can add them to the list. I've commented above that the full name of Satyadev Prasad is Satyadev Prasad Barnwal as written in the source. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 17:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Praxidicae, Can you please explain what I made wrong. --Raaj Tilak (talk) 17:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Read the original WP:PAID warning above. Praxidicae (talk) 17:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Their edits appear to me to be enthusiastic but unlikely to be paid despite first appearances. Somewhat vaguely: see their full set of contributions to Baranwal related pages in the edit history, their userpage history, and ).
 * I can't see a relevant guideline regarding email, but would strongly recommend that you use only on-wiki communications at the moment. You should also at least be aware of WP:SPA given your current editing focus. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 23:33, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * my experience says otherwise. Praxidicae (talk) 13:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for notified me. I really don't know about to Encourage someone to send me an email. but, Now I will never forget about this warning. I didn't paid for publishing Rajesh P Barnwal page. If you say to show proof. then, I will send screenshot of that message. Author will only requested me for publishing and reviewing that page. Thanks, Again --Raaj Tilak (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Goyal. NitinMlk (talk) 13:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Then how is it you're the copyright holder of images such as this? Praxidicae (talk) 11:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Surnames ending with wal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surnames ending with wal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Surnames ending with wal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 07:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ratnesh Barnwal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ratnesh Barnwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ratnesh Barnwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - FitIndia  Talk Commons 16:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletions
Hi there, I've just declined four of your recent nominations for speedy deletion because none of them met the criteria required for speedy deletion. Please familiarise yourself with the WP:CSD criteria before nominating more pages for speedy deletion. Thanks! stwalkerster (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I was about to take this to ANI but I'll leave you a final warning, Raaj. If you make retaliatory, blatantly disruptive and ridiculous nominations like this again, I will be requesting an indefinite block. Praxidicae (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Please, review again the Praveen Agrawal page. That is a BLP article and fully unsourced. --Raaj Tilak (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You need to review the actual tag. That is very clearly not an attack page or negative BLP. Praxidicae (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Jitendra Kumar Barnwal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jitendra Kumar Barnwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jitendra Kumar Barnwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPL93 (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Varun Kumar Barnwal moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Varun Kumar Barnwal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 10:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Govt. Jubilee Inter College, Lucknow (April 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QueerEcofeminist was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Govt. Jubilee Inter College, Lucknow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Govt. Jubilee Inter College, Lucknow, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Govt._Jubilee_Inter_College,_Lucknow Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:QueerEcofeminist&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Govt._Jubilee_Inter_College,_Lucknow reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 19:06, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 10:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Your disruption isn't limited to misuse of WP:BLPPROD; for instance, you were warned above about abusing the speedy deletion process to tag articles which are obviously not speedy deletion candidates, and two days later we have this. Good block. &#8209; Iridescent 11:35, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Rajeev Barnwal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajeev Barnwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rajeev Barnwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Unblock

 * I don't have time to review this right now (i'm about to go to bed), so I've put it into an unblock request and I'll allow any admin to make the decision on my behalf. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 10:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay. But, I assume that this appeal is only handle by you. Thanks --Raaj Tilak (talk) 10:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * First, unblock requests are not supposed to reviewed by the blocking admin - so you will have someone else handle it. Second, I blocked you 8 days ago, then you decided to evade the block (violating policy) for 5 days and cause even MORE work for administrators, and now 3 days later you want me to unblock you? You have to show that you can actually abide by our policies before I'd even consider unblocking you. Socking is the worst way to do that. --  Amanda  (aka DQ) 18:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I really apologize for this type of my mistake. I am really following the rules of Wikipedia now. Please see all good contributions with accounts below:
 * Bluee Bell: Welcomed new users using wikilove . Removed copyright contents . Removed redlink in disambiguation page . Removed vandalism . Defended Sanjeev Barnwal page.
 * CheatBeat: If you see my contributions of CheatBeat account. I added the right tags in articles. In Keshav Tyohar article I added Notability and BLP sources tag. I added and  tags in Pratapnagar - Alirajpur Passenger. Fixed Infobox and cleaned up unsourced . Remove indic script in,  and . Fixed grammar and added real website of village Gidhaur  but, reverted by another user.
 * WikiGamee: I assume it is not need to show my contributions of WikiGamee account because I didn't make any abusive edit from this. But, as a quick clue you can see that I fixed articles problems and removed tags, , and .Removed vandalism or attack on ABP News . The page Ahibaran was unsourced . But, I worked for it and nominated for WP:GA . Warned user for removing CSD deletion tag  and . Removed advertisement  and more like this.
 * --Raaj Tilak (talk) 07:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You need to show you can follow ALL the rules, like not socking, for a period of time, not just 3-4 days. The block was obviously needed at the time. I remain unconvinced that you showing the changes on your socks shows the block is not needed. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 09:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. But, how can I prove that I will follow ALL the rules? I mean to say currently I am blocked and can't make any edits. I don't want to any more account. So, I appeal this block. Also I promise you to never make any unconstructive edit to wikipedia and never give any chance to any administrators for blocking me. --Raaj Tilak (talk) 11:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You do it by following the most recent rule you broke. By not socking for a period of time. Normally people are asked to wait 6 months without socking, but if you don't sock from here, we may be able to work something out later. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 21:57, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * This means that I have to wait for 6 months till then not make any edits from socks or IP. Right? --Raaj Tilak (talk) 10:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Normally it would, but I'm saying I'm willing to look into it after you have taken some time away from Wikipedia, not the whole six months. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 10:52, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Ooo, I understand and I am ready for it. By the way when I read your last reply above its feels like crazy 🤣. --Raaj Tilak (talk) 11:06, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm glad you are ready for it, but it's still not at this time. Please take some time away from Wikipedia without socking. Maybe try contributing to a sister project. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 11:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure, I don't contact from you for unblocking me for some time. So, I don't ping you. Thanks and regards --Raaj Tilak (talk) 11:16, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello buddy! This is Raaj as your offer above, Is this enough months for unblocking me? --Raaj Tilak (talk) 06:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Raaj. It's definitely been a good while since your original block, and I'm willing to consider unblocking you. Would you agree to this condition: that you can't nominate CSDs or PRODs (that means you can still file AfDs and anything else deletion related, just not those two) until we can establish you understand the basic idea of what a Wikipedia article is? -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 02:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure, I agree with those conditions happily and remember that don't make any mistakes in future. --Raaj Tilak (talk) 09:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok, given that, I will unblock you forthwith. To make sure it is clear, I will state here that you are restricted from nomimating any namespace for speedy deletion (CSD) & proposing deletion in any namespace (PROD). This does not stop you from nominating an article for deletion at an XfD (i.e. AFD, FFD, MFD and similiar locations). You may appeal these either to me or to WP:AN after 1 month and by showing that you understand what type of pages are kept vs. deleted on Wikipedia. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 01:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I really Thanks you from my core of heart and remember those conditions. Cheers --Raaj Tilak (talk) 09:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Jagdish Prasad Baranwal moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jagdish Prasad Baranwal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Harish Chandra Burnwal moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Harish Chandra Burnwal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)