User talk:Raasta123

Speedy deletion of Template:Medium (TV Series)
A tag has been placed on Template:Medium (TV Series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Nivedita Tiwari 2012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nivedita Tiwari 2012.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nivedita Tiwari 2012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nivedita Tiwari 2012.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Himmanshoo Malhotra.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Himmanshoo Malhotra.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Non-commercial licences
You changed the licence. The licence cc-by-nc-sa-2.5-in (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 India) is a non-commercial licence, and thus treated as unfree (see Commons:Commons:Licensing/Justifications for an explanation). This is why you found that no template exists. This is a photo of a person who is still alive, so an unfree image wouldn't be acceptable (see WP:NFC §1). Unless you are able to obtain a different licence, I am afraid that this image will end up being deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I sent an email to the uploader. My fault, the permission statement, at first glance, looked like the standard wording. We get all kinds of personally crafted wording, many of which are not acceptable so I am usually happy to see a certain format, which almost always refers to one of the free licenses. This is the first time I've seen someone modify it to include a non-free license. I have written to the uploader to let them know it is not acceptable.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  21:59, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm really sorry about that I misunderstood the license specifics - this is the first time I have tried to understand them. I will get it corrected. Thank you. --Raasta123

Talkback

 * FYI, I see that the problem was explained in the section above.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  01:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

reliability of sources
The fact that the site is run by the production company means that the site has a primary purpose of promoting works from the production house and its primary purpose is NOT presenting all facts from a neutral and reliable point of view. See WP:RS for more information about reliable sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  02:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * (some) primary sources can be used to source content that is of a non-promotional nature, but they do nothing to establish that the subject is notable and worthy of a stand alone article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  15:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mohit Malhotra


The article Mohit Malhotra has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced article, No any reliable published sources. Fails WP:V

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. :- Chander  For  You'''  17:07, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Mohit Malhotra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohit Malhotra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mohit Malhotra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. :- Chander  For  You'''  14:36, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)