User talk:Rabadur

Welcome to the Wikipedia
I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:


 * Tutorial
 * Help desk
 * Foundation issues
 * Policy Library

For more information click  here . You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~.



(Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 11:18, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Dear Rabadur,
 * I hope I am not breaking any Wiki-rule by writting here: I suppose this is the talk page you told me to write in...  :-/
 * Thank you very much for your warm welcome (different from that of ...) and for the suggestions and links. Thank you also for fixing that problem with the link--although I thought I had already fixed it. :-\
 * I am really concern to learn to use Wikipedia in the proper way. I find it a very honest, deep, interesting effort to put things orderly to the reach of someone... and have some fun meanwhile. My intervention in the Opus Dei article was (por tried to be) honest, and my only problem is my general clumsiness with Wikipedia. I hope I will fix this soon.
 * Thank you, again. Hasta luego. --Uncertain 09:41, 18 October 2005 (UTC)


 * See the bibliography in the article on Opus Dei and Involvement in Far-Right Politics (if so you wish). Thank you for your flowers on my Engllsh skills... I would like, I would like. Bye. --Uncertain 09:41, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit
Please refrain from posting sarcastic provocations on my talk page. Pvazz 09:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Ending Statement for Opus Dei
I don't know that a statement is even necessary in the encyclopedic prose preferred at wikipedia. Any ending statement that basically says "evaluation of opus dei requires consideration of a number of controversial factors" not only sounds like a statement of the obvious (especially at the end of the article), but also doesn't really serve to add any new information. It's my feeling that some other articles don't include this kind of statement, but if you're going for featured article status, maybe you should read through some of those to find out if a closing statement is necessary.

Also, I'm not sure about Wikipedia policy concerning the inclusion of links to books at Amazon.com in the article. I think links to independent reviews are of course allowed, but links to vendors are generally not.

The article was an interesting lunch read! Good luck with it. I saw in the news where Opus Dei is demanding something from the Da Vinci Code for its representation...might be of interest in the article, I don't know. Turly-burly 06:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)