User talk:Rabbiplus

Welcome!
Hi Rabbiplus! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! William M. Connolley (talk) 10:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Dialectical logic
Hello, and welcome. However, I reverted your changes at Dialectical logic because they read as unsourced personal opinion not written in an editorial voice. See WP:RS for starters; also avoid language like Putting the political mambo jambo aside if you want to be taken seriously William M. Connolley (talk) 10:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * God bless. Are you knowledgeable of the subject? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabbiplus (talk • contribs)


 * I am knowledgeable on the subject of wiki, which is what you need to know a little of. Please look a little closer at what I said: I did not say your edits were factually incorrect, I said they were (a) in an unencyclopedic voice (we don't say stuff like "Putting the political mambo jambo aside" in articles) and (b) unsourced.
 * As a ps, you should learn to sign your talk page comments, including here, for clarity - the links above should include stuff like that. Do so with four tildes, thus: ~ William M. Connolley (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

thank, it is fine. but I see no restrictions on pasting my rant in the discussion page. so let it be.

The definition of dialectical logic
Dialectical logic is a counterpart of formal logic with the main difference between the two lying in the law of identity. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law of identity. The law of identity is basically tautology, which is alright, according to Wittgenstein. But it is certainly a blockage on the route to explore and investigate reality, especially in scientific terms. Therefore the modified law of identity as conceived by dialectical logic is that an entity is not just a singularity, but a composite of two different constituents. These constituents are the most abstract words or concept of any natural language in terms of which the rest of the world is described. There are the following concept pairs: space and time, form and content, quality and quantity, function and structure, matter and energy. The underlying idea of dialectical logic is that the ultimate purpose of scientific endeavour is to align the imponderable to the ponderable. Or in simpler terms to try to make a match between an infinite object with a definite object. Consequently, in the world of chaos where many to many relations exist, the aim is to find one to many and many to one relations only to eliminate all the false equalities and find a plausible one to one relation. But of course, it should not be the tautological a equals a only. Now the underlying discovery was the concept of numbers. Numbers also have a duality being both a serial and a cardinal number. Those two different role allow us to use number as unique identifiers hence allow us to sort things on numbers. Order sorting is also possible on quantities where the relations examined are the usual smaller/equal/bigger properties. Both pieces of knowledge bear importance in our unknown internal capacity of making predictions as to the distance of objects or the probabilities of events t materialize next in various contexts, including word order. As a result, one of the greatest difficulties that language presents us is the imperfect match of the two components of words, namely form and content. When form A has many contents (meaning) and when content B has many forms you have a problem. What you really want is that form A should be equal to form B on the basis of sharing the same referent/reference. If that is true, then you will be allowed to use form A in place of form B, hence supersede tautology and explore new territories.

Hegel: A logika. Enciklopédia I. Bp. 1979. Akadémia Kiadó. . Hegel: Előadások a világtörténet filozófiájáról. Bp. 1979. Akadémia Kiadó. Fogarasi Béla Logika c. könyvében. Bp. 1958. Akadémia Kiadó, Hegel: A logika. Enciklopédia I.. Filozófiai kislex Filozófia. Főszerk. Boros Gábor. Bp. 2007. Akadémia Kiadó. Rabbiplus (talk) 14:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)