User talk:RabidMelon

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Ironholds (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of The Real Alice in Wonderland (book)
A tag has been placed on The Real Alice in Wonderland (book), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

CSD nomination of Harry M. Rubin
Hi, I've undone your CSD tagging of the Harry M. Rubin article; when you disagree, you discuss, not delete. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Regards, Airplaneman   ✈  22:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jayron  32  01:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC) Legal threat issued here:. If you wish to contact the Wikimedia Foundation regarding a legal matter, please do so as described at this page. Wikipedia itself is not an appropriate venue to discuss legal matters. -- Jayron  32  01:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove block notices or the rationale for being blocked, while you are currently blocked. If you wish to contest this block, please follow the instructions above.  -- Jayron  32  01:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

And the legal threat is not even the only issue. Let's start with the contradiction of saying you have learned your lesson and then in the next sentence you say you don't understand why you were blocked. Then you move on to denial of the legal threat and the sockpuppetry, which you appear to have repeatedly engaged in both before and after this account was blocked. You didn't just edit the legal threat, you edit warred to keep it on the article. Hence, even if we were to believe you are not the same person who added it or at least acting in concert with them, you repeatedly added it and enhanced it at the same time, so that's not really an important distinction. Users who have made legal threats cannot be unblocked until they have unambiguously retracted the threat. And on top of that we have the socking and edit warring. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

One more time: do not remove declined unblock requests! It violates WP:BLANKING. Favonian (talk) 15:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Reminder


 * OK, lets try this: I will consider a conditional unblock under the following stipulations:
 * You avoid editing any articles related to Harry Rubin in any way.
 * You agree to maintain a single account (this one) and will not create any more accounts.
 * You agree to maintain civility at all costs, and will use article talk pages and the dispute resolution process when conflicts arise, and will not threaten other users or Wikipedia when you do not get your way.
 * If you can agree to these terms, I will unblock you. -- Jayron  32  20:42, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Jayron32's offer looks good to me. Considering that you clearly have a conflict of interest the requirement for you not to edit "articles related to Harry Rubin in any way" is reasonable. I myself would interpret "related to Harry Rubin in any way" as including all articles about members of the Rubin family. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:49, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Real Alice in Wonderland (book) for deletion
The article The Real Alice in Wonderland (book) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Real Alice in Wonderland (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 14:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello there
Hi, it seems that you or someone you work with might be the subject of one of our articles and are displeased with some of the contents. See Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject) for a general overview of ways to get problems fixed (as well as an email address). You can also mention specific problems on Talk: Harry M. Rubin ‎ (if/when you are unblocked) if you want specific mistakes corrected.

The email address is info-en-q@wikimedia.org. The first thing you might be asked to do is to privately establish your identity. Toddst1 (talk) 00:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

George Ernest Morrison
You replaced a non-free image with a free one- that's really not something you should be doing. Non-free content is usable only if it meets all of the non-free content criteria; this includes being irreplaceable by free content. Clearly, if there is already a free image, it is replaceable. I advise you avoid uploading non-free content until you are familiar with non-free content policies. J Milburn (talk) 21:44, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A young George Ernest Morrison.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:A young George Ernest Morrison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
 * I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:26, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

March 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

File:$1 listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:$1, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 169.255.184.199 (talk) 18:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)