User talk:RachelGB

Welcome!

Hello, RachelGB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sneh Chakraburtty, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MikeWazowski (talk) 15:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Sneh Chakraburtty


A tag has been placed on Sneh Chakraburtty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Sneh Chakraburtty
Wikipedia's core requirement for determining whether or not a person is notable enough to have an article on here is the presence or absence of reliable sources about the topic — that is, evidence that she's garnered coverage in real media, such as newspaper or magazine articles about her. This isn't a site where anybody is entitled to an article just because you can prove that they exist — regardless of the copyright on the text itself, an article can still be deleted if real sources which demonstrate real notability aren't present.

Her own web page and the webpage of the company that publishes her books aren't sufficient in and of themselves to demonstrate that she's notable, because they're primary sources whose purpose is to promote or advertise her work — our primary test for determining whether or not someone is notable enough for a Wikipedia article is whether or not she's already garnered significant coverage in media independent of herself. That's not to say that her own webpage or the pages of groups and companies directly affiliated with her can't be cited in the article at all, because they're still acceptable as supplementary sources once notability has been proven by citing some proper media sources, but they aren't valid sourcing to justify a Wikipedia article by themselves.

Basically, what we need is evidence that newspaper or magazine editors, television or radio producers, or other people who have time and space and resource limitations on what they can realistically cover, and who thus need to apply editorial judgement to filter what they do or don't give attention to and what they do or don't say about those topics, have deemed her to be prominent or interesting or relevant enough a topic to merit the coverage. It's not a comment on her worth as a person or the value of her work — it's just that we have to maintain certain standards of article quality on here, and one of those is the use of reliable media sources so that we can ensure that our content is accurate and verifiable and relevant to an international audience. Bearcat (talk) 17:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Furthermore, Wikipedia does not have articles on people or organisations because we approve of the work done by those people or organisations, and wish to publicise their work or help to "spread the word". Doing so is contrary to the policy that Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of any sort. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sneh Chakraburtty concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sneh Chakraburtty, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sneh Chakraburtty concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sneh Chakraburtty, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sneh Chakraburtty


Hello RachelGB. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Sneh Chakraburtty".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:48, 2 June 2014 (UTC)