User talk:RachelJohnson11/sandbox

From Dr. Cohen: All three are fine. You may want to go to the library main page and do a discover search to see which topics have the most relevant and up to date articles. That might help you to choose your topic.

Article Review
Jacob's Peer Review:

Overall, the edits that you are providing to your article are fantastic. The structure, the flow, and the tone of your additions fit the article well. I was reading through your sandbox and it seems that the main issue with the article was the lack of content. The sources you are using to add factual information will fit just fine.

Strengths:

Organization - The article is well organized and flows well. I understood what I was reading and learned new information. Information - The information and facts that were stated always had evidence to back the claim. When looking at each source, it clearly fit what was trying to be shown. Sources - Again, the sources showed what was needed to back each claim. Introduction - The first few sentences of the article clearly showed what was going to be talked about.

Weaknesses:

Sub Sections - The subsections Age-related Barriers, Psychological Barriers, and Legal and Ethical Issues could have more context. The statements that were there could be improved, I could not see if you were planning to or had improved these sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob4459 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Nayjha's Peer Review
Your contribution to the article flowed perfectly. There were many facts and data, and I actually understood what I was reading. Your sources were very reliable, and they supported the content in your article. On the other hand, I do think that more needs to be added to the article. I think that you should go more into depth in the subsections of your article. I get the basic concept of the sections, but I want to know more about them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nayjha Harris (talk • contribs) 17:31, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Response to Edits
Jacob and Nayjha mentioned I need to add more content to the subheadings. I plan on doing this! Other than that, they explained my article flowed well and I made significant cahnges to the wiki page. Thank you for your edits!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RachelJohnson11 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)