User talk:Rachel Finni

August 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Molly Mae Hague have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Molly Mae Hague was changed by Rachel Finni (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912382 on 2021-08-25T21:22:12+00:00

August 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Molly-Mae Hague. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 22:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Molly-Mae Hague for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Molly-Mae Hague is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Molly-Mae Hague until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pinktoebeans (talk) 08:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)