User talk:Rachel Spencer-ward

Possibly unfree File:Charles Edward Addington Coat of Arms 1876-1953.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charles Edward Addington Coat of Arms 1876-1953.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Addington Coat of Arms.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Addington Coat of Arms.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Addington Coat of Arms 1805.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Addington Coat of Arms 1805.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Addington Coat of Arms c1860.png
Thank you for uploading File:Addington Coat of Arms c1860.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Derek Bucknell Addington Coat of Arms 1912-2000.png
Thank you for uploading File:Derek Bucknell Addington Coat of Arms 1912-2000.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Anthony James Darren Charles Edward Piers Addington-Barker 1965.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anthony James Darren Charles Edward Piers Addington-Barker 1965.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Eaton James Elliott Charles Addington-Barker 2005.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eaton James Elliott Charles Addington-Barker 2005.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Nicholas Edward Addison James Addington-Barker 2007.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nicholas Edward Addison James Addington-Barker 2007.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Addington-Barker-Coat of Arms Basic.png
Thank you for uploading File:Addington-Barker-Coat of Arms Basic.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 07:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Julian Christopher Barnaby.png
Thanks for uploading File:Julian Christopher Barnaby.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 12:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 15:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Addington Coat of Arms c1860.png
Thank you for uploading File:Addington Coat of Arms c1860.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Addington c1690.png


The file File:Addington c1690.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned free-use image with no obvious encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 09:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Addington-Barker Coat of Arms Family.png


The file File:Addington-Barker Coat of Arms Family.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned free-use image with no obvious encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 09:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Addington-Barker Corporate.png


The file File:Addington-Barker Corporate.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned free-use image with no obvious encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 09:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Addington-Barker-ModelsEurope.png


The file File:Addington-Barker-ModelsEurope.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned free-use image with no obvious encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 09:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)