User talk:Rachel UR

June 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Longhair\talk 07:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)


 * I have globally renamed User:Cal4Care Singapore to User:Rachel UR as requested, and I'll leave the unblock review to someone else. But there is a problem with your request, in that Wikipedia is not a place to post your own ideas. It's an encyclopedia, which should only contain material that is supported by independent reliable sources, and does not cover speculation about things that "can revolutionaize business communication". And, I have to say, that really sounds like marketing - and the deleted article in your sandbox was blatant marketing, which you would also need to address if you want to be unblocked. Wikipedia is not a free marketing platform. I suggest you rethink your unblock request and explain how you would help us to build an encyclopedia. (There are blue links in this comment, so please click through and read them - and I'll also post a Welcome message, above, which should help you understand Wikipedia a little better.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I understand that wikipedia behaves like an encyclopedia and that is what I will follow if granted access to this account again. I just want to state and provide information on voice over IP systems where every bit of information will be cited with source and proof. I would really appreciate it if I could be given another chance.Thanks.Rachel UR (talk) 09:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Please wait for your unblock to be reviewed - the unblock request itself is all that is needed to attract admin attention. Given that your only contribution so far was blatant marketing/advertising for a company engaged in the voice over IP business, I doubt any admin will unblock you to continue to write about that subject. (Also, Wikipedia does not "behave like an encyclopedia", it actually is an encyclopedia.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I apologize for the confusion, but blatant marketing/advertising was not my intention, it is of no use to me. This is my first time using this and I was figuring out how this works. I was in the process of understanding the tools and editing and removing all but objective content and testing out the formatting options. I did not realize that I clicked publish instead of preview. I really hope you reconsider your decision. Thank you.Rachel UR (talk) 09:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Please stop using the "Help me" template. I have already explained that the unblock request itself is all you need for asking for help related to being unblocked, and it will be addressed when an admin gets to it - we're all volunteers here, so you will need to be patient. If you want to reply to a comment, just post the reply as plain text (indented by using ":" as I have done). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Sorry, wasn't aware. Okay. I'll wait.Rachel UR (talk) 09:36, 25 June 2018 (UTC)