User talk:Racheldelaney

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Racheldelaney/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:Racheldelaney/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Racheldelaney/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello Racheldelaney. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Racheldelaney. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. AntiDionysius ( talk ) 15:24, 28 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello AntiDionysius,
 * I appreciate your message and understand the importance of transparency in Wikipedia editing. I am disclosing that I am the Senior Marketing Manager at Financeit, and my edits were made to provide accurate and comprehensive information about the company. I apologize for not disclosing this earlier. I addeed the required disclosure to my user page. I am not receiving any additional compensation for putting this page together, and I'm very willing to work with Wikipedia to only provide information that aligns with the rules and code of conduct.
 * Please let me know if there are any further steps I need to take.
 * Thank you,
 * Rachel Delaney Racheldelaney (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)