User talk:Rachelkmoy/sandbox

Hi Rachel, my name is Max Yang and I'm currently a sophomore at Berkeley. I'm intending to study business/econ as well as data science. I'm really interested in wealth management and private equity. In my free time, I like to ski, fish, run, and my favorite thing to do with friends is go to music festivals!

Hi Rachel,

I think your paragraphs 1-3 on the responses from platforms are great as they add a new, unique, and important section to the article itself. The evidence you cite is overall pretty good as you provide pretty solid evidence on what their responses have been as they are straight from their website. However, maybe when analyzing the effects of their responses, using Facebook's word for it may not necessarily be the best as they could have bias in it. However, DARPA and MIT are great sources. Paragraphs 4-5 are very objective as well and your sources get pretty diverse; maybe try not citing the same article 3 times within the paragraph though. Kyle.chan201 (talk) 22:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Ethan Pak Peer Review
Hey Rachel! Overall, I think your drafts were really well written and very informative. Additionally, your tone was very encyclopedic and did not hint to any personal bias that you may have. I especially enjoyed reading about your information in the first three paragraphs, as I thought they went into a good amount of detail about the various programs being used to combat the use of "deepfakes." Especially when compared with the original article, this is a very insightful addition, as specific programs were not included. Furthermore, I think your section on deepfakes and politics is also very important, as deepfakes are such a pertinent issue within the political sphere. That being said, I do not think you need a whole section covering Nancy Pelosi's deep fake, as it seems unnecessary for the amount of information listed. If you did want to add more information about this specific example, I know there are many articles written about it that you could possibly site and explain the Democratic and Republican viewpoint on Nancy Pelosi's deepfake (and the topic in general). Overall, great drafts though! Ethanpak (talk) 02:26, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Per Review
Per Review Editor: Haley Mendlin

Hello! Your article is off to a great start! I appreciate and can tell how much research you have done to create this article and provide factual statements. To further improve this article, I think it would be great if you provided important terms and defined them. This will make it so that the reader can easily read through and not become confused by certain terminology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haleymendlin (talk • contribs) 02:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Ria Vora Peer Review
Hi Rachel! I peer-edited your article :) I think you have really comprehensive information and a paragraph for each relevant topic. One place I can see for improvement is separating Twitter and Facebook into separate sections, and to avoid using sources directly from Twitter and Facebook since they may not be entirely reliable. I would also recommend a clearer structure between larger headers and subheaders, but I'm sure it will come together in the actual article. Other than that, I think you have really strong information and it will contribute well to the article! RiaVora (talk) 07:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)