User talk:Rachitrali/Archive 1

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Chitral has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://groups.yahoo.com/group/khowaracademy (matching the regex rule groups\.yahoo\.com). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://groups.yahoo.com/group/khowaracademy (matching the regex rule groups\.yahoo\.com). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, CHITRALI The Language of Chitral NWFP Pakistan
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, CHITRALI The Language of Chitral NWFP Pakistan. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Khowar. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Khowar - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 09:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Khowar Academy Pakistan
A tag has been placed on Khowar Academy Pakistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Andewz111 (no 'r') (PingusTM) - Linux rulez! (nudge me) 07:04, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's. Please note that this applies whether or not you are logged in to the account you used to create the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  JamesBWatson (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Khowar Academy Pakistan


The article Khowar Academy Pakistan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The Khowar Academy is not notable per Wikipedia standards. Kindly add reliable sources to prove notability within seven days.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.   ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪    ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  17:39, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 15:51, 12 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Rahmat Aziz Chitrali inverviewing MNA Chitral Prince Mohiuddin Photo by Khowar Academy.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Rahmat Aziz Chitrali inverviewing MNA Chitral Prince Mohiuddin Photo by Khowar Academy.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 15:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Rehmat Aziz Pic.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rehmat Aziz Pic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 20:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:رحمت عزیز چترالی .jpg
A tag has been placed on File:رحمت عزیز چترالی .jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 20:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Rahmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rahmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 20:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Khowar-Chitrali Software by Rahmat Aziz Chitrali for Khowar Academy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Khowar-Chitrali Software by Rahmat Aziz Chitrali for Khowar Academy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 20:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Two Chitralis searching Khowar-Chitrali books at Book bazar.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Two Chitralis searching Khowar-Chitrali books at Book bazar.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 20:27, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Amir Ali Khan Chitrali Khowar poet.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Amir Ali Khan Chitrali Khowar poet.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:AVT khyber Reporter reading Chitral Vision Newspaper.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AVT khyber Reporter reading Chitral Vision Newspaper.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 20:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Khyber News Reporter reading Chitral Vision Newspaper.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Khyber News Reporter reading Chitral Vision Newspaper.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 20:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Rahmat Aziz Khan-1990.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Rahmat Aziz Khan-1990.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Guldasta-e-Rahmat The First Khowar-Chitrali Humorous Collection by Rahmat Aziz Chitrali available with Khowar Academy Library.png
Thanks for uploading File:Guldasta-e-Rahmat The First Khowar-Chitrali Humorous Collection by Rahmat Aziz Chitrali available with Khowar Academy Library.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

==File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Copy of Versified Khowar-Chitrali Translation of Allama Iqbals Books Baang-e-Dara Baal-e-Jibreel Zarb-e-Kaleem Zaboor-e-Ajam and Armughan-e-Hijaz translated by Rahmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg== Thanks for uploading File:Copy of Versified Khowar-Chitrali Translation of Allama Iqbals Books Baang-e-Dara Baal-e-Jibreel Zarb-e-Kaleem Zaboor-e-Ajam and Armughan-e-Hijaz translated by Rahmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:03, 14 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:03, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Khowar-Chitrali Poet Rahmat Aziz Chitrali receiving Literature and Journalism Award from Javed Ahmad Social Welfare Officer Cabinet Division.png
Thank you for uploading File:Khowar-Chitrali Poet Rahmat Aziz Chitrali receiving Literature and Journalism Award from Javed Ahmad Social Welfare Officer Cabinet Division.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Rahmat Aziz Chitrali inverviewing MNA Chitral Prince Mohiuddin Photo by Khowar Academy.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Rahmat Aziz Chitrali inverviewing MNA Chitral Prince Mohiuddin Photo by Khowar Academy.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Rahmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Rahmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rahmat Aziz Chitrali Photography


The article Rahmat Aziz Chitrali Photography has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Intended as nothing more than a photo gallery. Nothing to merge.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 14:43, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Gratitude



 * Thankyou so much Mr. Rehmat Aziz Chitrali for your Outstanding Translation effort'''!


 * I very very Grateful.


 * May you prosper!


 * (If you want your favorite article to be translated into the Chinese language, then I can help you.)


 * Yours Sincerely, --Jose77 (talk) 03:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The article has been created Here. --Jose77 (talk) 03:26, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Lakshan Bibi
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lakshan Bibi, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://digilander.libero.it/kisp/chisiamo/presidente_e.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:11, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lakshan Bibi
A tag has been placed on Lakshan Bibi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jimmy Pitt  talk  10:37, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lekshen Bibi
A tag has been placed on Lekshen Bibi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WVRMAD • Talk  • Guestbook  09:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Chitral Vision, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Cindamuse (talk) 05:22, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 16:33, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC).

GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:40, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 20:45, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:58, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:05, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 05:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Khowar-Chitrali Software by Rahmat Aziz Chitrali for Khowar Academy.gif missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Khowar-Chitrali Software by Rahmat Aziz Chitrali for Khowar Academy.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:55, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 11:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kaphor(Chitrali Cap)


The article Kaphor(Chitrali Cap) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOT. See also possible target for redirect at Pakul.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnbelievableError (talk) 04:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

File:96px-Rehmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:96px-Rehmat Aziz Chitrali.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:49, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shambey


The article Shambey has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Is there a point to having individual articles for every single word in another language?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &theta;v&xi;r    mag&xi;   spellbook 07:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Israruddin


The article Israruddin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 06:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Khowar topics
Template:Khowar topics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pichpich (talk) 13:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Join us at FB
Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:
 * Group: Pakistani Wikipedians
 * Page: Pakistani Wikipedians

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: --    Captain Wikipedia!    ( T  -  C  -  G  ) 08:19, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Chitral Vision for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chitral Vision is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chitral Vision until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:47, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to WLM!
You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Pakistan User Group
You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan


'''Hi !

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan

Pakistani Cultural Heritage - Edit Drive
Hi !

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July. Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC) You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

Nomination for deletion of Template:Proposed articles
Template:Proposed articles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 14:40, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

بلوچی ویکی
براس ما را کمک بکنت که بلوچی ویکی آ جوان بکننت — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salimkoohgardi (talk • contribs) 12:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Portal:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 05:46, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited Nagar District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nagar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Allai Tehsil, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Punjabi and Allai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

GOCE barnstars
Hi. Just for the moment, I've reverted your insertion on the GOCE May drive barnstars page, because your entry on the drive page did not list any of the articles you edited. Please could you reply here, listing the articles you edited and the word counts you used. Following that, I will gladly complete an entry for you on the drive page and the barnstars page, and will award you the barnstar you will have earned. Kind regards, --Stfg (talk) 09:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Karim Jan
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Karim Jan, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://pamirtimes.net/2011/11/10/celebrated-photographer-karim-jan-no-more/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Karim Jan and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Karim Jan, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Karim Jan with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Karim Jan. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Karim Jan saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Ymblanter (talk) 10:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Update regarding copyright concern
Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out above and sufficient time has passed since the placement of the notice, the article has been deleted for copyright concerns. This deletion is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) and GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (if you are not the copyright holder or have co-authored the material, release under CC-BY-SA-compatible license alone is sufficient), the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Wikimedia Communications committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you still may (or resend it, if you believe your original may have been lost), and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.

As Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that our licenses permit modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained and future copies are compatibly licensed.

Please note that once permission is verified, the material may be evaluated and altered to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Although we appreciate donations, we cannot guarantee that material donated will be retained.

Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:48, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

GOCE copy edit drive
Hello Rachitrali. I am coordinating the GOCE July 2012 copy editing drive. I see you have signed up for it, but in reviewing your work from previous drives, it seems you may have misunderstood the expectations for copy editing. To qualify for the drive totals, an article must be tagged with the copy edit tag, and you must then improve it by working on the grammar, punctuation, and so on. On reviewing the articles you recorded for the March 2012 drive in this diff, I find that you have edited some of them, but not in March 2012, and none of your edits were copy edits. In three cases (Shina language, Torwali language and Kalami language) the article histories show no edits by you at all. Likewise, the histories of the two articles you recorded for the July 2011 drive, Chitral district and Khowar language, do not show any edits made by you. I note also that you have not replied to my earlier enquiry as to which articles you copy edited in May this year. Please read over the drive instructions and the material at WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/How to/Step by step guide. For now, I am removing your name from the list of participants. If you are still interested in helping out once you have familiarised yourself with our expectations and are better prepared, please feel free to re-add your name to the drive page. --Stfg (talk) 21:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Chitrali keyboard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chitrali keyboard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chitrali keyboard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 18:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Please text me your email--Raki 04:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Please lift ban on my IP, you have mentioned me in AFD, but due to IP block i am unable to defend myself, please give me opportunity to defend myself, How can i defend myself? Please unblock me so that I can defend myself, I have been accused but I have not yet been provided opportunity to defend myself, this is not fair, this is violation of freedom of expression, after the completion of discussion, it is up to you to block or unblock the user, the combined IP which is used by hundred of users can not permanently be banned. Please give me opportunity to defend myself as this is the right of every user to defend himself regarding allegations. Sir, do you think that permanent IP block is suitable? Due to this nobody would be able to contribute to Wikipedia. Thanks --Raki 11:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  11:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  13:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I'm still waiting for you to provide explanations above in the section titled "Unblock me". There are quite a number of outstanding questions there that you haven't answered and you have the ability to do so on this talk page but haven't been. As such, you are in no position to participate in the deletion discussions or anything else on Wikipedia. Also, other editors may not proxy edits for blocked sockpuppets or meatpuppets so do not ask them. You've now implicated that you intend to do this above but those editors may be blocked as sock/meats if they do. Please make an accounting of your actions above.
 * sir, you have nominated Chitrali keyboard, Chitral Vision and an article Rehmat Aziz Chitrali how can I defend myself. You blocked IP which i and many other users are using. Please unblock me so that I can defend my self and produce my views before the wikipedia, onesided decision is not fair, I have been accused, and the accused has not yet been given the chance to produce evidence before wikipedia, I this this is discrimination. The articles you nominated for AFD are beyond my approach, I am unable to edit the AFD entry, This is the main reason. Once again I request that the ban on IP may kindly be lifted so that I can defend myself. Thanks -- Raki 13:43, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't nominate any of those articles for deletion. Other editors did. What other editors are blocked by my blocking of that IP? This is most interesting. Also, you have to defend yourself above in the Unblock section still.

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Due to personal enmity of Pakistani Wikipedian User:Saqib an old article of 2012 has now again been nominated AFD for 4th Time, The users, ,     , from 2012 to 2017 many editors edited this article, added links from reliable sources but one Pakistani user Saqib nominated this for the fourth time instead of rewriting, wikifiying and clean up he has nominated this article of the notable  personality for deletion, Is this the policy of Wikipedia? Is this a fair decision. A Linguist, a  researcher, An inventor,  a scientist, a translator a poet and a language volunteer's notability has been challenged by a pakistani wikipedia for the reason that he is jealous from his achievements, his world records in linguistics, his invention of a multi language text editor without searching documentaries produces by 14 TV Channels 20 Newspapers, his 23 Books on Pakistani languages, Please again search about his notability in Google, Yahoo,  Bing, Youtube, facebook, twitter that whether is notable or not? Due to personal dislike the Pakistani wikipedia has no arbitrary power to nominate an old article of a notable linguist and researcher.One of the leading Tv channel produced a documentary is available here , Mashriq TV  Leading Media Group ARY TV  Rehmat Aziz - the linguistic mastermind  The preserver of languages Nominated for one the prestigious International Peace Prize  Google search Urdu articles  another one of the leading International News Agency Mehr News Agency coverage , I request the User:Saqib to please stop nominating AFD pakistan related articles and rewriting like Draft:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali for gaining attention of International community, I am sure that the following sock puppet who vandalize this article are the sock account of User:Saqib please check history of this article , see these socks and their activity here User:Sher Aziz Khaan, User:Sher Aziz, User:GB fan, User:K.K Khel,User:Farhad Uddin,User:Najaf ali bhayo, User:Deepak Chitrali, User:Quwatkhan and many more vadalise this article without any justified reason.--14:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, well. You did get one thing right there. Najaf has probably been sitting back and enjoying himself because he has been a bit of an instigator here but I've actually known that and he wasn't pulling any marionette strings the way he thought he was. Now since you have revealed that you do know something about socks and their behavior maybe we can get back to yours. So my block on your IP is affecting a good number of editors?
 * @Rachitrali, I'm surprised to learn that we have "personal enmity". I don't recall if we ever had interacted before? Your accusations led me to delete the draft that I had created with the hope to have a bio on you, brief and well sourced though but no, I think you really don't deserve one. --Saqib (talk) 15:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ثاقب بھائی، اگر آپ کی میرے ساتھ کوئی زاتی دشمنی نہیں ہے تو آپ نےثاقب بھائی، اگر آپ کی میرے ساتھ کوئی زاتی دشمنی نہیں ہے تو آپ نے میرے بارے میں مضمون کو امیدوار برائے حذف شدگی کے لیے نامزد کیوں کیا؟ کیا یہ غیر مناسب رویہ نہیں؟ آپ خود ہی بتائیں کیا آپ نے اچھا کیا، میں نے آپ پر کوئی الزام نہیں لگایا، جن لوگوں کا میں آخر میں نام لیا وہ سارے کے سارکے جرابی کٹھ پتلی تھے اور ان پر پابندی بھِی اس مضمون کو بگاڑنے پر لگائی گئی ہے، کیا آپ نے ان اکاونٹس کا چیک کیا، آپ کے خلاف کوئی بات نہیں کی بلکہ مجھے شک تھا کہ شاید یہ جرابی کٹھ پتلی آپ کے ہیں، آپ ایک ایک کرکے ان کاونٹ کو چیک کرسکتے ہیں کہ انہوں نے اس مضمون کو بگاڑنے میں کیا کردار ادا کیا، ثاقب بھائی اگر آپ کے بارے کوئی مضموں کو حذف کرنے کی جرات کرتا تو آپ پر کیا گزرتی، یہ تو آپ مجھ سے بہتر جانتے ہیں، اللہ تعالی آپ کو ہمیں ایک دوسرے کے خدمات کی قدر کرنے کی توفیق دے، آمیں، میں ثاقب بھائی کے لیے قابل احترام نہیں ہوں لیکن ثاقب بھائی میرے لیے قابل احترام ہیں اس لیے یہ تحریر اس لیے میں اردو میں لکھ رہا ہوں تاکہ آپ کی ساکھ پر حرف نہ آئے، میرا اللہ حافظ ہے، --17:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You better write in English and don't send me emails. --Saqib (talk) 18:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Mr.Saqib, kindly refer to my today's email, and your clear cut reply regarding socks of group 8, I am of the view that you have no relations with other 8 socks who are evolved in socking, please wait I am clarifying this statement on my talk page, --18:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Undelete article [Rehmat_Aziz_Chitrali/]
This is an old article and edited by many editors and recently one editor has cleaned this article and removed the large portion of the article. Before deleting this please see the following reliable sources, whether the subject fall the notability crieteria or not.
 * Neo News TV Documentary, Mashriq TV Report Salute to Pakistani Channel 24 Documentary  ARY Tv coverage , 92 News HD tv report  Dawn News Tv Documentary  and many more electronic media and print media are also available.An old article of 2013 about Rehmat Aziz Chitrali has now been nominated for deletion due to some mis-understanding by the editors. Now the question is that whether the subject is notable personality or not. If he is notable the deletion log be removed and this edit edit may be roll backed to its original position immediately if he is not notable the bio be deleted. see , , ,  More news coverage here Linguist Honoured: Rehmat Aziz Chitrali gets Yasir Ullah Shaheed Talent Award 2015;Pleaes see his books on Pakistani languages here [] more references , , , , The Leading NGO of Pakistan MVU awarded title of The Linguistic Mastermind, please see  The BoloJawan has awarded title of The preserves of Languages, please see this  Documentary Report about Rehmat Aziz Chitrali in the leading Pashto Language TV of Pakistan  He is the pioneer of Chitrali keyboard  The leading Media Gourp ARY News tv has produced a documentary film on Rehmat Aziz Chitrali’s linguistic world record here . The leading media group Dawn TV has also produced a documentary about his life and works here  Another Media Group 92Newes Hd has also produced documentary report about him here  another here  The 24 Channel Produced a documentary on him tiled Pakistani Tujey Salam here .The Express Tribune with The New York Times (, , , , ,  and many more reliable and independent sources are available. This article has already been edited by the leading writers of Wikipedia from 2012 to 2017 and cleaned up the article i.e , , , , ,  and  and many more editors edited this article and redrafted according to wiki policy more references, 20 published books, 10 national awards, 03 Gold Medals etc will be provided as when required-- 10:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Please see the 95% of this article has been removed, links, Awards, Books, poetry, photographs and references has also been removed instead of cleaning up this article. The main reliable sources has also been removed, the profession, signature has also been removed, the 99% of infobox has also been removed please check you last edit here, Thanks--Raki 09:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


 * This article has already been edited by the leading writers of Wikipedia from 2012 to 2017 and cleaned up the article i.e, , , , , and  and many more editors edited this article and redrafted according to wiki policy.,    please check this article already survived and the status was Keep, now the votes in favour are 3 and against was also 3 but due to oversight or human error the article has been deleted please check the votes in favour and against. First one editor deleted the 95 % of the article and cleaned the article and rewrite the article according to the wiki policy and one editor after cleaning up the article instead of more clean up nominated this article for deletion. Is this Wiki policy that an old article about a world record holder, linguist, notable personality, poet, author, translator, Inventor, Keyboard developer and author of 20 books has been deletion due to personal like and dislike? This article  has already been survived and now the votes in favour and against are equal. The subject is notable not only in Pakistan but in the global community,  and the subject has already survived a previous AfD with a Keep, please restore the article to its original position of first edit of April 2017 and re-nominate this or create a draft:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali whether the subject is notable or not.--06:56, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Chitral Vision for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chitral Vision is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chitral Vision& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 21:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Rehmat Aziz Chitrali (2nd nomination)


This is an old article and edited by many leading editors and recently this articles has been deleted without considering the equal votes in favor 3 votes and against 3 votes, the votes are equal and many editors edited this articles since 2002 and voted that the subject is notable and this article be kept. But unfortunately the an article about a notable personality has been deleted with some sim-understanding and without searching reliable sources. Regarding notability please check the following Print and Electronic Media coverage, Documentaries, reports and columns and news clippings. Neo News TV Documentary, Mashriq TV Report Salute to Pakistani Channel 24 Documentary  ARY Tv coverage , 92 News HD tv report  Dawn News Tv Documentary  and many more electronic media and print media are also available.An old article of 2013 about Rehmat Aziz Chitrali has now been nominated for deletion due to some mis-understanding by the editors. Now the question is that whether the subject is notable personality or not. If he is notable the deletion log be removed and this edit edit may be roll backed to its original position immediately if he is not notable the bio be deleted. see, , , More news coverage here Linguist Honoured: Rehmat Aziz Chitrali gets Yasir Ullah Shaheed Talent Award 2015;Pleaes see his books on Pakistani languages here [] more references , , , , The Leading NGO of Pakistan MVU awarded title of The Linguistic Mastermind, please see  The BoloJawan has awarded title of The preserves of Languages, please see this  Documentary Report about Rehmat Aziz Chitrali in the leading Pashto Language TV of Pakistan  He is the pioneer of Chitrali keyboard  The leading Media Gourp ARY News tv has produced a documentary film on Rehmat Aziz Chitrali’s linguistic world record here. The leading media group Dawn TV has also produced a documentary about his life and works here Another Media Group 92Newes Hd has also produced documentary report about him here  another here  The 24 Channel Produced a documentary on him tiled Pakistani Tujey Salam here .The Express Tribune with The New York Times (,, , , ,  and many more reliable and independent sources are available. This article has already been edited by the leading writers of Wikipedia from 2012 to 2017 and cleaned up the article i.e, , , , , and  and many more editors edited this article and redrafted according to wiki policy more references, 20 published books, 10 national awards, 03 Gold Medals etc will be provided as when required-- 10:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Please see the 95% of this article has been removed, links, Awards, Books, poetry, photographs and references has also been removed instead of cleaning up this article. The main reliable sources has also been removed, the profession, signature has also been removed, the 99% of infobox has also been removed please check you last edit here.


 * This article has already been edited by the leading writers of Wikipedia from 2012 to 2017 and cleaned up the article i.e, , , , , and  and many more editors edited this article and redrafted according to wiki policy.,    please check this article already survived and the status was Keep, now the votes in favour are 3 and against was also 3 but due to oversight or human error the article has been deleted please check the votes in favour and against. First one editor deleted the 95 % of the article and cleaned the article and rewrite the article according to the wiki policy and one editor after cleaning up the article instead of more clean up nominated this article for deletion. Is this Wiki policy that an old article about a world record holder, linguist, notable personality, poet, author, translator, Inventor, Keyboard developer and author of 20 books has been deletion due to personal like and dislike? This article  has already been survived and now the votes in favour and against are equal. The subject is notable not only in Pakistan but in the global community,  and the subject has already survived a previous AfD with a Keep, please restore the article to its original position of first edit of April 2017 and re-nominate this or create a draft:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali whether the subject is notable or not. 12:33, 2 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The article was a self-promotional hagiography created by confirmed socks and mostly edited by socks, part of a larger scheme to promote Rehmat Aziz Chitrali on Wikipedia through a considerable number of very promotional articles, all without any reliable third-party sources to prove notability. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 12:38, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

While you are blocked, you may only use your talk page to request unblocking. Any other usage is inappropriate. That is why I collapsed sections above.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Rahima Naz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahima Naz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rahima Naz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 13:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Fakhruddin Sajid for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fakhruddin Sajid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fakhruddin Sajid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2017 (UTC)