User talk:Radagast83/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Philwiki
Philwiki: do you accept? Donbas 14:22, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll try to keep busy on it and everything else I'm doing on here and elsewhere. Radagast83 21:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Accidental Abuse

 * 1) Hello . One of your recent edits was undone by an automated bot as likely abuse of editing privileges. Our welcome page provides information for new users who would like to contribute. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you feel you have recieved this notice in error, please contact the bot owner. Thank you for your interest in our project. // Tawkerbot2 07:12, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I call it a mistake, I was messing around with that page that I came across. It isn't linked to anything and serves no purpose as it's redundant compared to the other Philmont Scout Ranch pages on this site.  I must have accidently hit the wrong buttons, as my computer was lagging behind for a moment before I closed the page.  It should probably be up for deletion anyway, perhaps I'll tag it soon. Radagast83 18:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

TA
Are you the same Radagast who posts (or posted) on TA? Feebtlas 14:43, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * TA? Probably not, I only use this same name on here, wikicities, and ratebeer.com off the top of my head. Radagast83 20:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Beer cats
It has been suggested by User:BrianSmithson and supported by User:Syrthiss that the Beer and brewery categories should be renamed. This proposal has been supported and expanded by myself. The notion is that the regional categories should follow the format of "Beer and breweries in Africa" /Europe/Asia/North America/South America/Oceania. "Brewers and breweries" could also be renamed "Beer and breweries by region". And all the countries should also be renamed (and merged if needed) as, for example, "Beer and breweries of Germany", "Beer and breweries of Britain", "Beer and breweries of Poland". The word in each case would be beer rather than beers to allow for general articles on beer culture in each region as well as individual beers.

Comments, suggestions, objections, free beer and simple votes to Wiki Beer Project SilkTork 15:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Merge Vote on Ultraviolet map
Hi I was thinking about taking this whole merge discussion in an entirely different direction. Instead of merging the info on the poorly named Ultraviolet map into the unfocused The DHARMA Initiative. How about we expand on Silentplanet's idea and create sub sections on known Hatches?

Remember the "The DHARMA Initiative" article is supposed to focus on what it is. Adding more information to "the Swan" only shows that this hatch should be expanded upon in another article. The title of this article after all is not "The DHARMA Hatches." To me it looks like we should put in some information about what exactly the DHARMA Initiative is. We should give some history on it maybe include the information on the film and then some brief information about the hatches and what they are. Hatches that we know more about like "The Swan" should have its own page that would then contain information such as "the Map", "The Timer", etc... I think that this is a more reasonable solution and would also make it a more logical solution as an encyclopedia article. Please let me know what you think (in your talk page)! And if you do agree please note that on your merge vote! Thanks -- UKPhoenix79 04:04, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Woodlawn Plantation
Thank you for writing Woodlawn Plantation. Can you please explain in the lead line what it *is*? It's explained where it is, how big it is and when it was given away, but I'm still not sure if it is a plantation, just a piece of land, a house, or whatever. Clarify in first line please. Jens Nielsen 07:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I added information that conforms to your request.  When I wrote it I was dead tired and decided I'd look at it in the morning when I was fresh.  Thanks for pointing that out. Radagast83 05:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Scouting article work
If you are getting this, it is because you do or did work on Scouting articles (see WikiProject_Scouting).

As the Scouting WikiProject has been formed since early January 2006, we've had many great improvements made in this area of Wiki and I want to personally thank everyone for their help. We don't always agree on things, but we keep moving forward. YIS, Rlevse 22:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

The DHARMA Initiative Split vote
I hope you don't mind a general reply to what most if not all of those opposed to the split on The DHARMA Initiative have said "we don't really have enough information on just the stations to justify an entire article just for the stations." I would like to point out that it is exactly the opposite, there is very little information about "The DHARMA Initiative" since everything seams to be about the stations. I decided that I'd see exactly how much of the article actually talked about the Initiative compared to the Stations. So I grabbed the sections that talk specifically about those subjects and I used the word counter found inside of MS Word to judge the content. Here is what I found:
 * Initiative focus on the page : These sections were the "intro" "History and purpose" & "Dr. Marvin Candle"
 * Pages - 1
 * Words - 242
 * Characters (no spaces) - 1,309
 * Characters (with spaces) - 1,544
 * Paragraphs - 7
 * Lines - 23
 * Stations focus on the page : Everything not in the Initiative focus, except for "Trivia" "References" & "External links" were included in the Stations.
 * Pages - 4
 * Words - 1,476
 * Characters (no spaces) - 7,143
 * Characters (with spaces) - 8,574
 * Paragraphs - 46
 * Lines - 132

The judgment that this page doesn't have a lot of info about the stations seams to be incorrect... the problem is that going by word count only (and almost exactly) 1/7th of the page actually talks about the Initiative while the rest of that 6/7th talks about the stations... This page is heavily focused on the stations and it should be acknowledged as such. So we have a choice to create a new article about the stations or re-name this article to reflect its focus!

I hope that this helps and Please put your reply in the comments section of the Initiative talk page. -- UKPhoenix79 02:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Hal Gardner
It seems to be you against the concensus of everybody else. please can you either take this a stage further and go on to meiation or requests for discussion or comment rather than this unilateralism you are adopting.--Lucy-marie 09:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Poll
Your vote/opinion on brewery notability is requested here: SilkTork 12:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Hal Gardner mediation
Hello,vRadagast83, I am Shadow1, the mediator in the Hal Gardner case in the Mediation Cabal. I hope that we can work together to resolve this issue as soon as possible. In order to do that, I have asked all members of this dispute to insert a brief explaination of their reasoning in the Hal Gardner talk page so that I, and the members of this issue, can all be informed of the problems in a quick and nonbiased way. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to put them on my talk page. Thanks! Shadow1 17:16, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

The Long Con
Hi Radagast83,

The implications I'm referring to are the veiled references the creators of the show make to the possible overall plot. The idea of everything being a hallucination is a fairly common theory, and this reference should probably be included as a point of interest, since the book's inclusion in the shot was almost certainly purposeful. It's trivial, to be sure, but then that's why it's in the trivia section. :)

I do agree, though, that noting the similarities to The Third Policeman is unnecessary and could be removed without losing anything interesting. Dbratton 17:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Greetings!
Just thought I'd say 'Hi' as a fellow brown wizard. It seems you're a fellow Lost-ie as well! Good to know.

See you around... Radagast 01:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Babylon 5
You seem to be removing large sections of the Babylon 5 article. While I thing that your work on citing the article is excellent, I would request that you please refrain from deleting such substantial passages without at least some discussion. Thanks, and happy editing! -Harmil 16:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I have discussed this. Look no further than Talk:Babylon_5.  Others have pointed out the same problems.  Most of the material that was removed IS Original Research.  Over the last few days I've attempted to source anything from a reliable source that would give creedence to any of the information that exists on the World Wide Web.  All of the material I've removed was either very unencylopedic (it may have been true, but has no place in the article), or was blatant Original Research.  The IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED FOR WP:GA on the Talk page clearly states what needs to be done to "fix" the article so that it can return to the Good Article status. Radagast83 17:03, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry I missed the discussion, I'll check it out. However, I disagree strongly that elements such as accents and ethnicity have nothing to do with the show. Ivanova has a strong sub-plot that spans several episodes involving her Russian and Jewish heritage. This is a major element of the first season. Garibaldi is not as strongly ethnic, and I'd have little or no problem with shortening the reference to his ethnicity, but it's still a part of the show. Then there are the characters. Clearly the Mimbari and Centauri accents are diverse. This is of interest to the most casual observer, and is widely discussed in public forums with the show's creator, so why would we NOT mention it? Then there is the matter of the near-universal use of English by aliens. This is a central issue. It's a human station, and while B5 is a "neutral outpost", it is important to note that aliens feel the need to conduct most of their business (even amongst each other) in English.


 * You even removed the section on religion! Nothing plays a more central role in the show. Let me cite a few examples:
 * Minbari religion which is displayed throughout the seasons (Delenn is a member of the religious caste, which comprises a third of their population) eventually dove-tails with the fate of the station's original commander and the primary conflicts of the third and fourth seasons as well as a civil war on Minbar.
 * The entire episode of "The Parliament of Dreams" is about the religions of the various races, and spends the closing dealing with the diversity of human religions.
 * There are at least three episodes that deal with the religious implications of medicine
 * An entire human relgion is invented as back-story for the show (Foundationism).
 * The aforementioned sub-plot with Ivonova is centered around her Jewish heritage.
 * The commander in the first season discusses his upbringing by Jesuits several times.
 * The Markab die as a race because of their religious beliefs.
 * The Vorolons appear to every race as a quasi-deific figure from their own mythology, implying that they may be the origin of some human mythology.
 * In the 5th season, a religious observance results in several characters meeting with the dead.


 * You are far better off marking sections that need citations or finding citations yourself than removing entire sections because you don't think they're central enough to the show. Doing so will improve the article, and require far less interference by authors who wish to retain the lost text. -Harmil 18:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Ivanova's heritage (outside the PSI Corps) was only notable in the first few episodes of the first season. As it is, it's more about her character development, and thusly better off in her own article (of which almost all that information appears).
 * About Garabaldi: His ethnicity doesn't play a part at all, and thusly should not appear in the article (it is already included in his character's article). You're all but advocating the inclusion of any information of any character just because it "still a part of the show".
 * "Clearly the Mimbari and Centauri accents are diverse." No, the point is it ISN'T clear to someone who isn't a fan of the show (no citations). That's the whole point.
 * The "religion" section in question was part of some "truth seeker" section. Perhaps I should have put it in a different section, but mind you, since it was under "Love..." and didn't fit.  I deleted it.  Since you seem to have a grasp on the section, fix the section so it's verifiable, notable, and encylopedic.
 * Radagast83 19:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


 * First, off, you might want to at least leave me a note on my talk page telling me that you responded. I have hundreds of pages on my watchlist, and can't add every talk page that I leave a note on, sorry.


 * Ok, that said, I want to thank you. Jeff Q's comments on Talk:Babylon 5 really made me appreciate the time and effort you've put into this page. In contrast to his "delete it and let someone who cares sort it out," attitude, yours is refreshing ;)


 * However, a few notes: there are four episodes that deal with Ivanova's ethnicity in the first season. The most critical come toward the end of the season (TKO and one other... name is on the B5 talk page if you want to check). Also, I'd agree when it comes ot Garibaldi. At most, we would just include a note along with the background blurb for each character (Sinclair was raised by Jesuits, Ivanova is from a Russian Jewish family, Garibaldi is from a Boston Italian family, etc.) but that might be on a characters sub-page where the characters are really the focus.


 * If you're going to complain that I'm not sourcing my talk page comments with respect to the Minbari, then I'm sorry, but I have limited time to dedicate to Wikipedia, and that's over the top.


 * Furhter, on your last point, the section was not about a "truth seeker", but "True Seekers", which is a phrase used repeatedly throughout the series by the Minbari to refer, not to LOVE per se, but to matters of the heart (which to the Minbari includes religion, philosophy, prophesy and this concept of true seeker, which can encompass certain kinds of love, but not typically purely romantic love). This is covered in seasons 1, 2 and 3 extensively. Just as a matter of reference, see "Grail" and "The War Prayer". The phrase was used out of context, however, and wasn't worth sourcing. I'll make sure it apprears on the Minbari page. -Harmil 15:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Lost
Hiya, just wanted to say that I'm very pleased and impressed with the great work you've been doing on the individual episode articles. :) Also, FYI, you might want to add your name here, to a new WikiProject that just formed:  WikiProject Lost. --Elonka 06:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Baldy Town
Please go ahead and merge the Baldy Town article into the camps article (not the main Philmont article). Rlevse 01:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Power Rangers planets merges
You seem to be doing a lot of redirecting, but not a lot of merging; what's up with that? —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Good point. Many of the articles say the same things in "so many words."  I will go back and add any information that I may have mistakenly gone overboard with no merging. Sorry.  I haven't yet finished editing the list page.  I'll stop merging until I finish adding the info and submit those changes first. Radagast83 03:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, there are only a handful of planets that I'm particularly concerned about, KO-35 (three main characters' home planet), Aquitar (an entire season's characters' homeplanet), and maybe Mirinoi. Not quite sure about the others, though. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll go back and revert the ones you pointed out based on the information they actually contained. Radagast83 03:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Chaperonins and chaperones
Hello, I've reverted your merger of Chaperone into chaperonin. In my experience, chaperonins are a subset of the chaperones&mdash;the two terms are not synonymous. (Chaperonins are the chaperones which form multimeric complexes that encapsulate nascent proteins; not all chaperones do this.)

Be cautious if you want to do a bulk search and replace when you merge text, as well. Particularly when dealing with footnotes and references, you don't want to change the titles of documents in the article's references.

Finally, unless you're certain that the merge is appropriate – again, extra caution is called for in techical topics – make certain that both the subject and the target articles have had the appropriate tag (mergefrom or mergeto to give subject matter experts an opportunity to correct any problems. Cheers, TenOfAllTrades(talk) 05:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Good, they should probably remain seperate then, if it hasn't been merged by now, it won't. Radagast83 05:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

merge deletions
You seem to be deleting a lot of merge tags, including Strong cryptography and Cryptographically strong, with no explanations. The two i cited were even marked as minor edits. Can you explain what you are trying to do?--agr 18:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The merge tags I've been removing are on articles that have either already been merged, or have (in the talk pages) conclusions that warrant an oppose to the merge (some from 3+ months prior). I'm trying to go through the backlog of proposed merge articles to figure out what still is in need of debate on the issue of merging, ones that have concluded against merging, and ones that have already been merged and the tags just haven't been removed. Unfortunately some articles don't seem to have much in terms of debate (with one or two people total chiming in on an article, but as already stated most seem to have stopped the discussion sometime in the summer, some with no further edits since before August, so in most respects the debate is done), others have already been completed months ago and no one bothered to remove the tags. I'll try to remmember to note this in the edit summary for the articles from now on. Radagast83 19:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do, I had no idea what was going on. I restored the merge tags to the two articles in question and added to the discussion on the talk page.--agr
 * Great. Radagast83 21:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

D class cruiser
When you converted D class cruiser to a redirect, did you ensure that unique information was edited into the Danae class cruiser article and not lost? Folks at 137 18:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

BCI
Hi. Thanks for adding the material to BCI. Hope you won't mind - I've shifted it to Brain implant. Been trying to build the theme in fiction section using the Brain implant page rather than BCI because there's a hugh amount of overlap and the BCI page is already longer that wikipedia guidelines suggest is good. Please talk me if you want to discuss this further. Cheers --Saganaki- 06:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Erytheia
When making a brief article into a redirect, it is normal practice to enter into the remaining article any text that will be effectively deleted. If Erytheia as an island of Gades seems irrelevant to you in the context of the article Hesperides, that might have been a signal that turning an article with interwikis in three other languages into a redirect was a less-than-perfect idea. --Wetman 10:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Galicia
Can you possibly help out at Talk:Galicia (Central Europe), since you seem to be the one who added the paragraphs that I cannot decipher? - Jmabel | Talk 23:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * . The information merged into the article was from a history article fork (which for the most part already existed here). The information that currently resides here is a better version of what existed beforehand (if that can be believed). You caught me before I could go back and fix the text (which probably only got thrown into a translator from whatever language it was originally in to begin with) to actually make sense. Radagast83 00:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Mergist
Glad to see a fellow mergist on Wikipedia. We still have a long ways to go, but our efforts are starting to getting noticed. &mdash; Deckill e r 01:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merging overall isn't that fun of a task, but it's gotta be done. Some are extremely easy, some are impossibly difficult without knowing what the heck the article is talking about. What I'm shocked about are some merge tags have been on articles for over a year. I just have been going through every article listed on the September month merge backlog one by one to see what to do (I got up to 'H' before I decided to go back and work on 'A','B', and 'C' in more detail). I'm glad I'm not the only person working at it, since it has taken me a month just to get this far! Radagast83 01:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it's one of those "dirty job" things; take a look at User:Deckiller/cruft for my battle scars. If you'd be willing, I'd love your help on Star Wars merges ^_^. &mdash; Deckill e r 01:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Influenza epicentre
You redirected Influenza epicentre to Influenza pandemic. Please be sure nothing sourced was lost. WAS 4.250 02:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Health Wiki Research
A colleague and I are conducting a study on health wikis. We are looking at how wikis co-construct health information and create communities. We noticed that you are a frequent contributor to Wikipedia on health topics.

Please consider taking our survey here.

This research will help wikipedia and other wikis understand how health information is co-created and used.

We are from James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia. The project was approved by our university research committee and members of the Wikipedia Foundation.

Thanks, Corey 16:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Completed it. Interesting, I'll be at JMU this Saturday evening. Radagast83 05:54, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Azael/Azazel
Thanks for getting that merge done, been trying to make time for that for some time!
 * You're welcome.Radagast83 08:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Laser scanning merge
I have restored an old version of the 3D scanner page that you have recently merged, destroing in this way your work. Sorry for that but your laudable merging action was done over a very vandalized version of the 3d scanner page, that removed 90% of the original content. Sorry for that, but it was the only easy way of restoring a lot of valuable stuff. ALoopingIcon 21:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That's fine if it was a vandalized version of it. Wow, looking at it a LOT of information was removed, good call! Radagast83 21:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Catholic Youth Work Article
Hello, I have to respectfully say that I disagree with your moves to merge together the Articles on Catholic Youth Work and Catholic Residential Youth Work. Catholic youth work is a wide area which involves millions of people worldwide and is worthy of its own article. Catholic Residential Youth Work is also a massive area which is very distinct within Catholic youth work and worthy of a separate article. It is a key area which differs significantly from other areas and is a profession upon which many practitioners of youth work solely concentrate.

There are a great many other areas of far narrower fields than Catholic Youth Work which merit their own articles. It's not as if Wiki is short of space!

May I ask, what your reasons for wanting to merge the articles are? May I ask what experience you have of Catholic Youth Work and specifically of Catholic residential youth work?

If such an inappropriate redirect is established again, I will instantly remove it and report the abuse to Wikipedia.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.249.230.249 (talk • contribs)


 * The reasons are clear enough, perhaps reading up on merging articles may be in order if you are unfamiliar with the process, it was an unopposed merge. No one objected and the tags were there for weeks (and I assume months). Accusing me of vandalism (in the edit history comments) is not very civil at all. Also, please sign your posts in the future and consider setting up an account. Radagast83 02:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair point. I apologise for accusing you of vandalism. That was uncalled for. I also take the point about the tags being unapposed. Now that they are, hopefully the matter is resolved.

For you
Just wanted to say I've noticed your efforts and I'm very appreciative of the role you're playing in attempting to clear out the large backlog that is Category:Articles to be merged. Much thanks! theProject 18:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Bob and Tom Show Edits
Hi Radagast83, I revised your edits regarding the Mr. Obvious running gag as too long for that section and partially captured by the articles on Chick McGee and Dean Metcalf.

Maybe this would be a time to consider a detailed gag section for the article?

Thanks,

Larry

Lmcelhiney 12:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Metromedia
Hi Radagast,

What's with this edit? It appears you have "merged" two articles by redirecting MetroMedia Radio to Metromedia, but you did not incorporate any of the info from the redirected article into the existing article! How long have you been "merging" articles like this? Firsfron of Ronchester 23:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Only when there isn't anything useful to merge. In regards to this article, the entire paragraph describing the history of the network exists as a multi-paragraph section in the article I merged it to. As far as I can tell it contains everything that existed in that article and has a greater level of detail. It appears the only thing I did miss (which I appologize for) is the external link. Radagast83 23:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thnaks for adding the link; I've added the category. Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester  23:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * You too! It's always good to be reminded if we're doing everything we should be doing to keep up the standards we all want here. Radagast83 23:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry about coming on pretty strong there; I just was very worried articles were being redirected without incorporating the rest of the text. As that's not the case, I'll shut my yap. :) Best, Firsfron of Ronchester  23:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

This is not a pipe
Greetings human. Regarding this edit to a diambiguation page, it is usually better to leave them unpiped. It makes it clearer what the distinctions between the articles are. Please accept this as contructive, and slap me with a trout if it doesn't come across that way, I've apparently been even more unintentionally rude than usual lately. - brenneman  23:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Numismatics
You added info to this page with a summary of "completed merge". Merge from where? Jo e  I  22:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Numismatic auction catalogs, the section that the article is named after, a merge which seemed to be unopposed for 4 months.Radagast83 22:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I had never seen the article. One day I will try to add it back.  :)  Thanks   Jo  e  I  22:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Your surprise merge on Flat Earth
I was quite surprised to see the merger of some material on Muslim discussions of the Flat Earth into the present Flat Earth discussion. Normally such mergers are preceded by a notice on both pages being considered for the merger, and a full discussion of the merger proposal.

There was already a discussion on Could you fill me in on where this material came from, as it dilutes the focus of an article which had reached "Good Article" status by defining itself around a historical issue of the debate over belief in the Flat Earth in medieval Europe.

I would prefer not to simply delete the material, but feel it does not belong in the present aricle and should be returned to its original source.

--SteveMcCluskey 00:00, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It shouldn't be quite a supprise, although it does seem to be that there may not have been a tag on one of the two pages. With that said, there was a debate which was ongoing from all the way back in August on the subject of merging (Talk:Muslim_flat-earth_theories).


 * You're right about the European point-of-view of the article, and perhaps the article title should be renamed to be more accurate to the article's contents, or the article should include all forms of flat earth theories (worldview expansion). Radagast83 00:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Puddling furnace
Thank you for completing the merge for the above. There is a similar problem with Extraction of iron - see its talk. Is there any chance you could tackle that, or is it beyond your expertise? I have recently (I hope) sorted out various parallel historical sections, and do not think I have the time to tackle another major issue. Peterkingiron 15:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Video conversion
I've added the "" template to the article Video conversion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Video conversion. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Esurnir 05:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

User scenario Merge
Thanks for that. It slipped off my to-do list. --Ronz 17:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

RailTransport In India
Looks like its been vandalised - I am not familiar with the article enough to know whether its outright vandalism enough - though you should be alerted! SatuSuro 06:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it was. I've added it to my watchlist for now.  Thanks for the notice! Radagast83 06:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Anytime - its a relief to have someone in similar time zones - some of the major wp trains issues have to wait for those over there to get up ! SatuSuro 06:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Roman Cement
I notice you set this to redirect to "Cement" on 31st Dec. I suppose this is OK, since it is described (sketchily) in the Cement article. However, this produces a circularity, since many articles, including "Cement", currently wikilink to "Roman Cement" or "Roman cement". Either all these links need to be modified, or the separate article needs to be reinstated. Since there is controversy about the meaning of the term that doesn't really admit discussion in the general "Cement" article, there is some justification for keeping the separate title. I would have a go at writing this to a better standard than the previous article, if there were some hope of its staying put. What should we do? . . . . LinguisticDemographer 15:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Gabriel and Dresden
Your edit of Gabriel and Dresden is slightly flawed. The myspace blog is not some fanboy site. The myspace quote is from the actual Dave Dresden blog himself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.19.35.225 (talk • contribs)
 * Personally I thought the validity of places like Myspace didn't meet the requirements of a valid reference, but I could be wrong. Radagast83 17:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Please fill in edit summary field whenever possible
Hi Radagast83, I was looking at the history of the page International Movement Writing Alphabet, where I noticed that you made some edits without filling in the edit summary. I've been working on evaluating articles that have recently had templates or categories deleted, which may be caused by vandalism, but could also be well-meaning edits. The use of edit summaries, even if it's just one or two words, really help in determining whether a category deletion was made in good faith and if it should be reverted. In the future, please be sure to fill out the edit summary; for me, it was helpful to turn on the "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" option under User Preferences, Editing. Thanks! -sthomson06 (Talk) 18:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

tire iron/lever merge
Just wanted to say thanks for doing the merge I tagged but was too lazy to ever actually do :) - Severinus 08:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Firouzabad‎ -> Firuzabad
Would you object to moving the article entitled Firouzabad‎ to Firuzabad? The reason for the move would be that "Firuzabad" is the more common English, and European, spelling of the city's name. You may answer on the discussion page Talk:Firouzabad. Thanks. --Bejnar 01:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Virtual serial port
I have added a "" template to the article Virtual serial port, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mugunth 09:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Lippia nodiflora and Phyla nodiflora
Hi Radagast83,

Both articles are about the same plant. Lippia nodiflora (L.) Michx. is synonym of Phyla nodiflora (L.) Greene  - See ITIS: Phyla nodiflora

Best wishes,

--Ricardo 23:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ricardo, if you read this, could you do the merge? It's from November so I was just trying to clear the backlog. Radagast83 23:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Cam'ron discography
Hi Radagast. I noticed that you redirected the Cam'ron discography page to the Cam'ron page as shown in this edit. For the meantime, I've removed the redirect because to my understanding, specific discography information should not be kept on the main artist page; see Mandy Moore for example. If I'm mistaken or if there was some kind of consensus to merge the info, please tell me. Thanks! Spellcast 09:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Japanese flag issue
Hi Radagast. Few months ago you've entered interesting facts into Rising sun flag article: "When the Kodoha militarist political group took power in 1941, the banner was also used administratively until 1945."

- Rising sun flag

Could you be so kind and support this part with sources? I would like to use this flag for few preojects but without citation I'm unable to do that. Regards, Piotr Mikołajski 19:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia backlog Link
I used your link to the Wikipedia backlog on my own userpage. Zab 03:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Software Componentry and CBSE
You deleted my proposal for a merger between these two pages, on the grounds that there was no consensus. All the objections referred to the possibility of merging from CBSE into Software Componentry. There were no objections to the reverse possibility of merging from Software Componentry. I have therefore made a new merger proposal, this time specifying the direction of the merger. --RichardVeryard 21:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Democratic Bloc
Re merger of Democratic Bloc, please note, the profile of Hassan Madan, clearly stating that he is the leader of PDT-Bahrain in the intro. 'Democratic Bloc' is just a wrong translation of the name. --Soman 07:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Not sure if you'll read this, but thanks! Taken care of it. Radagast83 12:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for adding missing info from the merge. Blueshirts 17:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Yang rou chuan
Hi, you merged Yang rou chuan but it looks like several of the paragraphs didn't make it across into the new article (?) Even the name "yang rou chuan" isn't mentioned. If you're sure these two dishes are identical, it should be made clear why there are two different names. Badagnani 22:22, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi, your attention to this would be greatly appreciated. Badagnani 03:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Digital Poetry
Hey you recently removed some links for the digital poetry page...which were not spam but legitimate resources for digital poetry......so please readd those!

WABAC
I just noticed that at the end of last year you had merged the WABAC article into Mister Peabody. I recently noticed that the article for way back machine was redirected to internet archive which did not seem quite right; that rather misses the mark, IMHO. So I started to sketch an article on the wayback machine: User:Bdushaw/wayback, which is meant to discuss the WABAC machine, the use of the term in popular culture, and also as the internet archive machine. The plan is to replace way back machine with this article, then change the redirects for WABAC, wayback machine, etc. to aim at the new article. Seems to me there are plenty of references around, although I am working on the popular culture angle - the term is frequently used, of course, but where to find a decent reference for it... My concern with the redirect was that the meaning of the way back machine was being replaced by the internet archive tool. Anyways, I am writing for your opinion, advice, I hope the plan is o.k., etc. From the discusson of the merge in WABAC the problem seemed to have been apathy, rather than controversy. Thanks - Bdushaw 08:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

And it just occurred to me that, unlike the tardis (Mr. Dr. Who fan :) ), the WABAC machine can only travel back in time, and then back to the present.   No travel to the future.  (I guess thats why its called the wayback machine, duh!) This must be why nostalgia is frequently associated with the use of the wayback machine.  Bdushaw 09:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

wendell berry
your edit messed up the reference -- can you please fix that? i understand your desire to combine my article into the larger wendell berry one, but it's not worth it to fix one problem only to create another. Eupedia 15:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It was an extremely simple fix, adding the references tag at the bottom of the article. Be careful how you use the word "my" in reference to articles, it's not your article: WP:OWN. In the future I'll triple check that there are actually ref tags in the article and include a corresponding reference tag before merging. Radagast83 02:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Priscilla and Aquila
Radagast, I redid this merge, in order to keep most of the article history with the article (explained on Talk:Priscilla and Aquila). Also, please note that your merge left a number of double redirects to be cleaned up - which I am happy to help with, but may not have much time for today. Pastordavid 16:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, I was a little too bold in that department and only thought about the history of the pages after I had finished the merge! Isn't there an automated bot that cleans up double redirects?  I'm never on top of those things. Radagast83 19:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

DC Meetup notice
Greetings. There is going to be a Washington DC Wikipedia meetup on next Saturday, July 21st at 5pm in DC. Since you are listed in Category:Wikipedians_in_Virginia, I thought I'd invite you to come. I'm sorry about the short notice for the meeting. Hopefully we'll do somewhat better in that regard next time. If you can't come but want to make sure that you are informed of future meetings be sure to list yourself under "but let me know about future events", and if you don't want to get any future direct notices \(like this one\), you can list yourself under "I'm not interested in attending any others either" on the DC meetup page.--Gmaxwell 22:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

La Ville d'Arcangel
Thanks for merging the articles. -- Brianhe 19:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Relics attributed to Jesus
I think that this article should be merged just like what I did. Please respond on my talk page. Laleenatalk to me contributions to Wikipedia 13:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)