User talk:Radanliev

June 2020
Hello, Radanliev. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add requestedit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Radanliev


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Radanliev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 15:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Talk pages for consensus
Hi Radanliev! I originally removed your earlier edit for possible copyedit, as the wording ("... the world we live in...") induced me to that conclusion. I have since restored the reference you provided and have cited just one line of the paper's conclusions.

However, my main concern is the perceived COI. As a researcher, you are well aware of the Disclosure statement, so this is not something that should come as a surprise to you, as it might to other users. , above, has already pointed out to you that, while the "editing community highly values expert contributors", "if you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add requestedit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added." One of the advantages of doing so is that other users, be they experts in that particular field or merely experienced Wikipedia users, can reach a consensus on how best to include the new content, how much to include, where to include it, etc.

I reckon it's all pretty straightforward, but if you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 09:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)