User talk:Radar33/Archives/2011/April

Speedy deletion contested: MGCV
Hello Ajl772, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of MGCV, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Is a plausible, useful redirect or is not a redirect at all. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 20:33, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Acknowledged. – Ajltalk 04:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

RE: V. Kereszi
OK. Thanks for your help. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 15:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Well that was interesting. I clicked on my talk page without knowing someone (you) left a comment here, and I saw your message.
 * You are welcome. – Ajltalk 15:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Cinemax 3
Hello Ajl772. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Cinemax 3 to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Ged UK  19:38, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. DreamGuy (talk) 01:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't lecture me about NPOV especially considering the debate concerning this topic. There is not, nor ever will be, an consensus on what is considered NPOV regarding whether or not Mormons are Christians. – Ajltalk 01:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think you are using the word the same way Wikipedia uses it. See WP:CONSENSUS. And stop inserting WP:WEASEL wording that exists solely to push a WP:POV. Thanks. DreamGuy (talk) 01:32, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Stop inserting weasel wording? You make that sound like it's a continuing crime I have been committing.  This has been the only time that I have made an edit that could even remotely be considered weaselly.  And, for the record, I have the POV that Mormons ARE Christians, so accusing me of pushing a POV (one I disagree with at that) is a completely FALSE accusation. – Ajltalk 01:51, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

LDS church
Hello Ajl772, thanks for your comments in the LDS church article. Can we mobilize some more administrators and reviewers to stop the ignorance of those who speak of a "majority of sources that see mormons as christians"? So far just the OED3 speaks of a millenian christian sect along with some statistical surveys in the US, that don't explain their classification. I am only active on the german wikipedia, and have an account there, but I don't want to register to other Wikipedia versions as well. I have done a lot of research and was the one who posted the sources that oppose to the mormons' self-belief as christians. I would like to see more people joining the discussion, since right now there seems to be too many supporters who ignore any criticisms done by the sources or expressed by critics directly to the talk page. Nothing against those supporting christianity for mormons, but then they should acknowledge the truth about academic sources, and not tell lies. In the german Wikipedia we have come to the conclusion of not calling the LDS church and mormons as part of christianity without additional information that this is a self-belief and heavily disputed in the academic world. --217.5.199.242 (talk) 13:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, this is a POV I do not support, so, No, I will not help you. – Ajltalk 14:51, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I noticed on that page you made the comment "the refusal of the church to accept the Nicene creed, seen by some scholars and officials as the only dogma every christian should believe in". By that definition, Christ himself nor his apostles were not Christian.  What do you have to say to that? – Ajltalk 15:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Katrina ShameOnMe SingleCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Katrina ShameOnMe SingleCover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
18:34, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Feedback replies
Posted here: Requests_for_feedback/2011_April_16. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested
Formal mediation of the dispute relating to Senkaku Islands has been requested. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. For an explanation of what formal mediation is, see Mediation Committee/Policy. Please now review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then, in the "party agreement" section, indicate whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page.

Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 04:45, 25 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Ajl772, you need to fill out the "Issues to be mediated" section. I'm pretty sure that the issue is something like "The name of the title of this article--specifically whether it should be "Senkaku Islands", as it is presently or changed to "Diaoyu Islands", "Pinnacle Islands", or some combination of one or more of these name?" I could add it in there, but 1) I'm clearly not uninvolved and clearly have a strong opinion already, so I don't want to get accused of pre-biasing the question, and 2) the Mediation instructions explicitly state that initial filer needs to complete that section.  Assuming that, or something like it, is your intended issue to be mediated, I will join the mediation.  Qwyrxian (talk) 05:39, 25 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Ajl, please complete the "Issues to be mediated" section of the request (as per my note on the request page). Thank you. For the Mediation Committee, AGK  [&bull; ] 20:45, 25 April 2011 (UTC)


 * And apparently, nobody reads edit summaries... In which I clearly explained I was not finished with it. – AJLtalk 06:10, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Katrina ShameOnMe SingleCover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Katrina ShameOnMe SingleCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:26, 27 April 2011 (UTC)