User talk:Radhika Budhwar

It looks like this account is continuing the conduct of another...
Your recent editing history at Existence of God shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 13:08, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

This is bullying. Radhika Budhwar (talk) 13:17, 5 August 2012 (UTC)


 * No, it is not. You were advised to use the talk page to add your content, and you refused. You're welcome to contest your block, but you don't get free reign of the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 13:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for it was used to continue an edit war after your parent account,, was warned about the conduct. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 13:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)