User talk:RadicalMod

August 2015
Hello, I'm Orduin. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rahula Anura Attalage because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Orduin  Discuss 01:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ameer Abdullah— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Conventus Bracarensis. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Conventus Bracarensis was changed by RadicalMod (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881454 on 2015-11-10T19:16:13+00:00.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Abrantes. I am One of Many (talk) 19:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)