User talk:RadiomanPA

Wow, nicely done at Collins Radio and R L Drake Company. Prose, photos, and references of such high quality are rare for someone new to Wikipedia. Hope you stick around. - LuckyLouie (talk) 15:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'm enjoying it - still learning.  In fact, I'm assuming this is the right place to respond to your comment - hope I'm right. It was amusing to see that you uploaded an S/Line picture after my recent edit last night - before I could upload my own! -  RadiomanPA (talk) 16:14, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yep, that's right. I even took out the other photo because yours are much better. Anyhow, there are plenty of articles to improve and expand, like E. F. Johnson Company, Hammarlund Super Pro, Swan electronics, R-390A, National Radio Company, Signal/One, and World Radio Laboratories, to name a few. Again, welcome and have at it. (PS: you may want to fix your User Page. Right now, it's exactly the same as your Talk page (?) - LuckyLouie (talk) 16:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, will do. I thought I read somewhere here that before you set up a User Page you should redirect it to your Talk page, so that's what I did (for now).  I will get to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RadiomanPA (talk • contribs)

Things in "See also"
Check out WP:SEEALSO, which advises "whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense". I tend to think that other ham equipment providers "of the same era" are relevant and useful for readers looking to read as much about a topic as possible, including subjects only peripherally related to the one in question. However I can see that long lists in "See also" sections attract editors looking to help clean up messy articles. - LuckyLouie (talk) 11:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC) Also, I just noticed that the Heathkit article mentions (and hotlinks to) Drake and Collins in the article text, which is a good reason for removing them from "see also". - LuckyLouie (talk) 11:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

SX-28
Started the Hallicrafters_SX-28 article. Feel free to revise, improve, edit, add material. 73 - LuckyLouie (talk) 20:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Great! I'll have a look when I get some time (this weekend probably). RadiomanPA (talk) 02:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Callsigns
I looked at the "diffs" in the Amateur radio article and did not see that your original edits deleted any references. So it's much ado about nothing, I suspect. Only thing you should know is that the english version of Wikipedia strives for a "world view" in its articles, so "callsign" or "call sign" should probably be written in the way it is written in the majority of english speaking countries, not just the US, so whatever term the ITU uses I'm sure is fine. - LuckyLouie (talk) 14:54, 12 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, tnx. RadiomanPA (talk) 18:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
I don't want to spam you, but I think this is important, and would like to know your opinion. WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  22:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC)