User talk:Radko Kovac

Primary and academic sources
''You may ask a peasant from the district of Ostrovo, or Bitola, what he feels himself to be, and nine times out of ten, he will answer you - Macedonian! Thereby, an honest observer would name them “Macedonian Slavs,” or simply - Macedonians.'' is POV by Edmond Bouchie de Belle published in 1922 and is out of date. ''At the end of the First World War there were very few ethnographers, who agreed that a separate Macedonian nation existed." is NPOV by Loring M. Danforth, from The Macedonian Conflict: Ethnic Nationalism in a Transnational World, Princeton University Press, 1997, ISBN 0691043566, p. 65. Please, do not use primary, but academic sources. 88.203.200.74 (talk) 13:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, so is the writing of Brailsford a non-academic source. He was a journalist. Radko Kovac (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Oh, there are many primary sources, not confirmed by a secondary one, to be removed. Radko Kovac (talk) 13:19, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
I have opened up a sockpuppet investigation against this, latest of your Wikipedia incarnations. The case is available here.-- L a v e o l  T 10:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I’ve just found you both here as well. Your clashes are epical. But, I must admit, you’ve got a point. I’ll add this quote into the article.:
 * - "Here's also what Stavridis has to say in page 216: "The Bulgarian government... seeing that Sandanski's successors, and Panitsa in particular did not have his [Sandanski's] leadership ability nor his education, tried to conquer the organization [IMRO] from within, enrolling many individuals dedicated to the idea of a Bulgarian conquest and annexation of Macedonia" etc, going on about the Bulgarian government providing funds and assistance to control the organization, or its accepting the autonomy of Macedonia only as a first step towards annexation, using IMRO as vehicle for its own ambitions."

Radko Kovac (talk) 22:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Wait a minute. Why is this paragraph here removed?
 * - Shortly before he was killed, he went to Solun to meet Elefterios Stavridis, a Greek politician. After the meeting, Stavridis wrote down Panitsa’s views in his autobiography. He published some very useful information about the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization (IMRO), its struggle, ideals, disbandment, re-establishment and its downfall. He clearly stated that the IMRO originally fought for an united autonomous state of Macedonia, and therefore for the Macedonian nation, for its official fortification. But, above all, Stavridis concluded that the IMRO was a completely Macedonian national organization, before the Bulgarian authorities seized it under their control.  Radko Kovac (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Bbb23, can you show me the comparisons about the edits? My work at Todor Panitsa was a revert of an old edit that had been discussed on the talk page. I explained it here above, so it's naturally for that, as a revert to be similar with the previous edit. Show me another example, please. Radko Kovac (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * What further evidence do you need? You know you are the same person. You even edit from the same IP range when logged off. You also stumble upon the reverts and comments made by previous puppets by accident. We are not that stupid, you know. -- L a v e o l  T 05:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I know that I'm not Bobi987 Ivanov. Look, I don't know who edited my typo a day after I comment here above. I don't know who this " 79.126.255.72 " is. We might have edited the same article then, and he opened my contribution page. But, it's obvious that that IP (" 79.126.255.72 ") is not here, as well. Fact! How did you connect me with this undisciplined user Bobi987 Ivanov ? Radko Kovac (talk) 09:29, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * So is it your IP or not? You are starting to contradict yourself. Was it your IP at the time (you have a floating IP, just like the puppet-master) and you are happy the exact same IP was not included in the list there? Or is it that it was not your IP and you are arguing someone else corrected a typo on your talkpage where he ended up by accident? And I am not sure why I even bother explaining. You know it and we know it. Heck, you are probably making a new account this very minute. -- L a v e o l  T 09:47, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * It's not my IP, that of one that corrected a typo on my talkpage. Radko Kovac (talk) 09:56, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The question is: How did you connect me with this undisciplined user Bobi987 Ivanov ? Radko Kovac (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Oho, this is wonderful - deleting sourced information, ignoring academic historiographically affirmed content and censorship. Admins of Wikipedia, may I ask, doesn’t it bother you that when all this is going to be exposed and spread, the integrity of Wikipedia will be being questioned and compromised (and, to some extent, ruined)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.126.172.184 (talk) 21:08, 1 December 2014 (UTC)