User talk:Radmir

TUPAC SHAKUR IS NOT DEAD AT ALL JEHOVAH OF ALL ARMIES HAS MADE EVERYTHING THAT HE SAID THROUGH THE MOUTH OF TUPAC COME E TRUE IN ALL THESE YEARS HE HAD TO HIDE HIM FOR SUCH A TIME AS THIS..AS A YOUNG MAN WITH TRUE KNOWLEDGE WISOM AND UNDERSTANDING THERE HAS NEVER BEEN NOT WILL BE ONLY GENERATIONS OF FOLLOWERS SET FROM FROM THE WICKED SYSTEMS AND POWERS OF THE WICKED FALLEN DOOMED ILLUMINATE. THAT HAS ALLOWED SATAN TO CAUSE THE ONES INVOLVED IN IT TO BE TRAPPED...BLINDED...DEAF AND DUMB EVEN AFRAID TO CRY OUT LOUD ABD SPARE NOT...TUPAC NEVER ALLOWED THE WICKED SYSTEMS TO STOP HIM FROM SAYING GOING AND DOING ALL THAT JEHOVAH OF ALL ARMIES HAS CAUSED HIM TO DO SAY AND EXPRESS STILL REGARDLESS TO WHAT SATAN AND HIS EVIL FOLLOWERS PLOTTED TUPAC STILL CRIED OUT FOR THE POOR AND TRAPPED PEOPLE OF ALL SOCIETIES ....

Replaceable fair use File:Mlk,ölöölöflhölh.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mlk,ölöölöflhölh.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 02:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vår sida av stan


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Vår sida av stan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GSK ✉ ✓ 19:05, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ison & Fille


A tag has been placed on Ison & Fille requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GSK ✉ ✓ 19:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lilleman


The article Lilleman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  22:37, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Linda Pira


A tag has been placed on Linda Pira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. freshacconci talk to me  15:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lilleman


The article Lilleman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. DMacks (talk) 15:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nas discography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  STATic  message me!  17:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Radamel Falcao. Thank you. QED237&#160;(talk)</i> 21:37, 1 September 2014 (UTC)