User talk:Rado0403

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rado0403/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Rado0403/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Rado0403/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eagleash&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Rado0403/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 18:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Eagleash, I understand all of the points made above on why my page was declined but I truly do not see what the problem is for it being out there on the internet since it is NOT factually or objectively incorrect and I get why you guys discriminate against people with no clout but there still is no reason here that is valid enough in my eyes for this not being on Wikipedia for my own mental well being.
 * Anyway you have a good one my friend. Rado0403 (talk) 18:03, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The issue is that Wikipedia is an encylopedia which relies and reports, on what has been written about a subject in independent sources. It is not a form of social media or a site for promotional activity nor does it have much interest in what someone has to say about themselves. It is not uncommon for persons to think they can create a 'profile' for themselves in the way of social media (I.e. Facbook or similar) and be "on" Wikipedia in the same way as LinkedIn or others. Eagleash (talk) 19:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Rado0403/sandbox
Hello, Rado0403. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Rado0403/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Rado0403/sandbox


Hello, Rado0403. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)