User talk:RadomirZinovyev

Welcome!
Hi RadomirZinovyev! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Wareon (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Formerly Armenian Inhabited Settlements


A tag has been placed on Category:Formerly Armenian Inhabited Settlements indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Iğdır pages
Thanks for the new Iğdır pages but you should know that Etnikce is not a reliable reference next time. Happy editing. --Semsûrî (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Kosack. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Horlivka offensive have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 14:36, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Please stop your activities immediately, they go explicitly against consensus.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Do you care to specify which activities in particular? The pages on settlements are overwhelmingly irregular and lacking uniformity. I find it hard to believe there is consensus on anything at all. RadomirZinovyev (talk) 06:50, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Then you have to work hard, because there is a very clear consensus about the names of these localities. They are all romanized Ukrainian names. Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I see, you're talking about that, In that case can I bring up some points about the context of that?
 * Back when the original conflict began the seperatist republics had both Russian and Ukrainian as official langauges, this was abolished some years ago
 * Neither of those republics were recognised by any UN nation as sovereign nations, which now they are recognised by Russia.
 * I have made clear to include the Ukrainian names in a secondary position, but the simple fact is they are no longer official by the present authorities, and that situation won't be changing.
 * Nobody in these areas even calls them by Ukrainian names, these areas are Russian speaking absolute majority
 * There are settlements in Crimea which are not by standard Ukrainian latinisation, what difference is there now between Crimean and Donbass republics recognition?
 * RadomirZinovyev (talk) 07:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * These are not authorities, these are occupational administrations. The consensus is that this is still Ukrainian territory, and Ukraine has only one official language. Crimea should go back to the Ukrainian romanization as well (with the exception of Gurzuf, which was moved after a RM). The exceptions are the Communist era names such as Krasnodon, which were renamed by Ukrainian authorities, but the rename had no effect since Ukraine does not control the areas. This only applies to the boundaries of LNR and DNR before 2022. We are not going to rename the localities just on the basis that Russian army occupied them briefly; the best we can do here is to mention the occupation fact using reliable sources (note than some sources you used do not conform to the definition of WP:RS). Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Coat of arms of Russian occupied Kherson
After searching image with Google I discovered the sketch for the coat of arms of Kherson city under the Imperial Russia, which looks nearly identical to what used in today's Kherson after occupation of Russia, as my suggestion, you should rework the image to make it respect the sketch. Thanks.

See:
 * Герб Херсона

--Great Brightstar (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Minor edits
Please learn and apply the definition of WP:MINOR edits. Several of the recent edits that you have marked as "minor" are not minor edits.. It does not matter if you think the edit is correct. It matters if the change is minor. Adoring nanny (talk) 21:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Sanctions Alert
Adoring nanny (talk) 00:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop restoring unsourced and fake text to articles as you did at Kherson oblast (Russia). If you continue to try and restore this text you will be reported for creating WP:HOAXes on Wikipedia.  Volunteer Marek  12:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * You are deleting sourced text along with the unsourced. You will be reported for article vandalisation if you don't stop. RadomirZinovyev (talk) 12:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No, that’s false. But hey let’s pretend it’s not. How about you restore only the parts that are sourced? And don’t refer to other editors edits as vandalism.  Volunteer Marek   12:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Deleting half a page without regard for it's content is vandalism. RadomirZinovyev (talk) 12:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No. When it's unsourced false WP:HOAX info, it's not. One more time - second warning - do not call other people's edits vandalism.  Volunteer Marek   13:01, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Please post consensus indicating that Kherson and Zaporozhye Oblasts are WP:HOAX. RadomirZinovyev (talk) 13:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Please stop trying to hide behind consensus. Unsourced text can and will be removed. No such things exist currently.  Volunteer Marek   13:19, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~ Dallavid (talk) 00:11, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LNR
Template:LNR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:In Donetsk
Template:In Donetsk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:In Lugansk
Template:In Lugansk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)