User talk:Radon210/Archive 2

List of State Routes in New York
Please do not remove redlinks from this page. These serve as a reminder to editors that these articles need to be created - as described in WP:REDLINK, If you wish to help with redlinks, and have some knowledge about the subject, feel free to follow the link and create the article(s). Thank you,  master son T - C 03:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

your monobook.js
I noticed your recent monobook.js edit on IRC. FYI, WP:TWINKLE says "If you just want to use one or more of the individual modules, here they are listed with their dependencies. Do not add these if you've already chosen the complete script, as they would just be duplicates." --Jeremyb 00:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Smile


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Hello, pass the message on to three other people. Let's see how far the smile will go! Marlith  T / C  03:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Your smile on User talk:Georgewilliamherbert
You may want to repost it -- I had to remove it because of the vandalism... it wouldn't let me simply undo. Gscshoyru 01:59, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Yay! Smile appreciated. Have a nice night! Georgewilliamherbert 02:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for reverting vandalism off my userpage and warning 82.34.193.228 for doing it. :D It was very much appreicated AngelOfSadness  talk  18:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Climate of Australia
Just wanted to let you know that the IP user made two edits and you only reverted one of them. I've gone back to the last clean version. &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 01:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

The Welcomer's Barnstar

 * You're welcome :) and thanks for the smile! ♠  TomasBat   20:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the welcome...yes I love editing here! It's alot of fun...sort of addictive :)

(Gopi41 01:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC))

Also a big thank you from me, the links are extremely use- and helpful. I try to keep my small edit work up. Drbreznjev 16:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

New Editor Adding Autobio
I'm a new editor on Wikipedia. The first article I posted (Bill Davis (artist) was both flagged as a possible "conflict of interest" and as an article that may need "cleanup" concerning "neutral point of view." The article is an autobio. I created it in order to provide a link to articles, already existing on Wikipedia, about companies or projects to which I made significant contributions. I gave the article a very "neutral point of view" merely stating facts and completely avoiding opinions or statements which could be open to challenge. Is the posting of an autobio on Wikipedia the problem itself? Is this against the policy or standards set by Wikipedia? If so what would be the best way to get this information posted, in order to make the links?

I guess I've been a little to "bold." :-)

Thank for your help with this matter? Trowzers 15:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Help!
I edited the vegetarianism page to include pertinent information, adding that the ancient Essenes which were an ascetic Jewish sect, and some beleive, also first christians, but its been challenged (by you?) already sayings its *vandalism* which it definitely is not. In the process between my edits, and the challenge edits, the html has been messed up and edits have been inputted where they shouldnt be (messy html) Can you tell me originally why this addition was challenged and how I can fix the html? Thanks! Shekinah —Preceding unsigned comment added by ShekinahLove (talk • contribs) 22:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello AFUSCO
I did an edit on Circuit City as it seemed like advertising hype and seemed to need a broader scope of information. I would welcome any feedback concerning the several paragraphs I chose to include. Thanks, --Jurnei 21:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello again AFUSCO. I stopped the Circuit City article again today, adding more content, and found the section for consumers completely erased. I thought it was OK and even checked in with you previously. What happened? Please let me know as I don't yet know how to wiz through this place. Thank you,--Jurnei 17:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't quite understand
What do you mean? Is this regarding my speedy to ?--Angel David (talk•contribs) 01:57, 16 September,2007(User Talker Contributor)


 * Please,AFUSCO. Speak a little less suffisticated. Between you and I, I'm only 11 years old. My vocabulary is not that extended. So please speak normal. --Angel David (talk•contribs)  16:36, 16 September,2007 (User Talker Contributor)


 * Oh! Okay--Angel David 19:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Am i welcomed?
I might be acting strange, but i am on wikipedia since 9 months and no one has welcomed me. Can you welcome me please. I know its insignificant now, but i feel unwelcomed. Thanks! Luxurious.gaurav 10:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

WGLO
Holy crap... I barely post the article, realize a mistake in my formatting, go back to edit the page and add some more information, and it's ALREADY challenged??? Jeez, guys... This will be a complete article, I am gathering information as we speak. InDeBiz1 21:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC) InDeBiz1 on 9/18/07

Smile


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.


 * PS Please let me know how editing out nonsense text as well as contesting a prod and categorising an article is considered vandalism and I won't have a problem.  Until then, I think an apology is in order for saying what I did before I signed in is considered vandalism.  Postcard Cathy 00:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Still waiting!  Postcard Cathy 14:41, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Again, quote chapter and verse on how contesting a prod and categorising an article is not considered constructive.  172.129.29.174 01:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes it did remove content. If you hadn't deleted my original message, you would have seen I said I removed content such as the prod which I contested and sentences such as saying that the teachers jolly attitudes led to well behaved students.  Since when is deleting content like that vandalism?  Compare the pre-edited content to the post edited content and specifically tell me that what I removed was vandalism and under what wiki standard it is considered vandalism.  Or I guess that any nonsense such as that should stay on wiki cause god forbid we remove nonsense.  Postcard Cathy 19:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Hayashi clan
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I believe you are in error with regards to the abovementioned article; I am not vandalizing it, I am creating a disambiguation page, as per the discussion on the article's talk page. Thank you. -Tadakuni 00:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Don't worry Tad  Afusco seems to be doing that alot tonight.  Leaving messages without doing her/his homework.  Postcard Cathy 00:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Advanced Audio Coding
I'm curious about your reverts to three edits I made to the Advanced Audio Coding page. My rationale for all three edits were to improve the article quality (it's labeled Start-class) and cut its length (it's quite long). Also I have a history of constructive edits to the article in the past. XanderJ 04:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Change 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Advanced_Audio_Coding&diff=158849998&oldid=157672596 I removed a few duplicate links that happened in a short span of text and bubbled a few links upward to their first use.
 * Change 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Advanced_Audio_Coding&diff=158851508&oldid=158849998 The text struck was already duplicated nearly verbatim in AAC-LD and replaced with the opening summary and a
 * Change 3: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Advanced_Audio_Coding&diff=158854722&oldid=158851508 Perhaps the most controversial of the three edits, I struck sections the iTunes and iPod section that seemed Germain to AAC. They generally dealt with container issues (like .m4b bookmarks), rational for DRM, and product history that really belongs on the product page instead.

I've added discussion sections on Talk:Advanced Audio Coding and Talk:Advanced Audio Coding to make sure there is a consensus before those sections are modified again but the first edit still seems to be a straight forward cleanup removing excessive duplicate linking. I look forward to hearing back on your thoughts. --XanderJ 00:45, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Synopsis
I didn't do that for no reason, read my talk page, or the discussion page of List of Bleach characters. Hartebeest 23:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)