User talk:Radstyke

Spider-Geddon
Hi there, I have removed your recent changes to Spider-Geddon due to very odd formatting. I'm not sure what you were going for, but the text of half the page was struck through, and there were a ton of unnecessary "nowiki" tags. I really can't tell whether this was intentional vandalism, or you're not understanding something about formatting. If your edit was done in good faith and you can clean up the formatting, it may be fine to re-add. If I can help, please let me know. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 01:54, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Spider-Man
Have you read the replies to the discussion you started on the Spider-Man talk page? Continuing to edit war while ignoring them makes you look disruptive, which can lead to a block. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:34, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I read them,but it's just that the information I'm reverting was already uploaded by someone and I feel that it should be uploaded. That's why I'm reverting it. Emadjshah (talk) 19:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I suggest making a strong argument for inclusion on the talk page and using "but I like it" as your key point. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:59, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, and the characters which I'm adding back are essential for Spider-Man's history like Human Torch, and the user who is removing the stuff has a lot of people asking him on his talk page to stop Emadjshah (talk) 19:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * There is more than one editor who is reverting you. Furthermore, the "lot of people" on that talk page are actually all one individual who was blocked for using multiple accounts.
 * I understand that you think the Human Torch is a significant partner. However, the infobox is supposed to be a summary of the article, and the article does not mention the Human Torch at all. I suggest you do one of two things: make a strong argument explaining why he's significant on the talk page and convince a majority that you are correct, or edit the body of the article to include sourced information about the partnership. Also, please sign your posts with four tildes (~) so that your name shows up at the end of your comment. I don't know why you're putting my name at the end of your comments here, but it will give other viewers the impression that I'm talking to myself. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:33, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

That's kind of sad, going to the extent of making many accounts all because he had to convince something. I'm sorry, i don't know all the rules of Wikipedia, I joined some months back, but thanks for the info.( I thought by writing your name I was mentioning you like in other social media) I'll make sure I'll make the edits correctly. Emadjshah (talk) 19:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

You and your new friend need to stop it already. You’ve never told me why you keeping adding them besides that they help him. Give me a good solid reason why they should remain on the page instead of reverting it. Pinky Rhino (talk) 19:22, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * My new friend? You never asked. You're removing wrong characters, I mean they're legit partners of Spider-Man. They shouldn't be removed Emadjshah (talk) 21:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * There's a difference between legit and significant. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * That's the word, significant, they're significant characters, and just ask yourself don't you think Human Torch is significant?Emadjshah (talk) 22:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You didn’t even what what significant was before. Most of the people you keep adding aren’t significant. Venom and Ben Reily are not significant partners. Tell me why they are significant. Pinky Rhino (talk) 23:22, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Spider-Man has been partners with Venom since it came to comic books and Ben Reilly is like a brother to him and they had been partners before he was dead. They're significant. So, I request you not to remove any of these Emadjshah (talk) 09:02, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The article only describes Venom as an enemy.
 * The article doesn't mention the Human Torch.
 * The article doesn't mention Deadpool.
 * This is how we determine if a character is a significant partnership. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Alright, But just to make this clear when I first edited it, Venom and Deadpool were already there.
 * Rest assured, If anyone will remove or revert them again, I won't change it 👍.
 * and thanks for the help Emadjshah (talk) 14:46, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * As I noted on the talk page, I have no objection to expanding the article to include information about those partnerships, so long as the content stays on topic. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Actually, neither Miles, Black Cat, Prowler or Silk are mentioned as partners so I'd like to know of is this correct? Penguin7812 (talk) 16:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Could you guys please read about indenting your comments? It makes reading easier for others. Argento Surfer (talk) 18:14, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm done reverting it. Emadjshah (talk) 20:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Me too, but can I add the go down Swinging story Spider-Man's fictional biography. Penguin7812 (talk) 21:35, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes you can. Emadjshah (talk) 21:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Characters of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 08:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)