User talk:Radu1995

Welcome!
Hi Radu1995! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! PhilKnight (talk) 17:56, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your edits
I have reverted you, because you removed all the references. PhilKnight (talk) 17:56, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Untamed Romania. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. As indicated previously, you are welcome to add (sourced) content, but please stop removing already-sourced content and associated references. Kinu t/c 18:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Untamed Romania
Thank you for your improvements to this article. However, please stop editing the lead in a manner that contravenes the Manual of Style. Also, the lead is intended to have certain properties (bold and italicized title, title in original language, the year of release, etc.) and is supposed to summarize the article, hence why mentioning things that are included in the article (such as the narrators) is acceptable. Removing the links to other articles is also disruptive. See WP:FILMLEAD for more information. Thank you. -- Kinu t/c 11:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Again, please stop removing wikilinks to other articles. Also, please do not introduce unnecessary "fluff" or other PR-style text. Repeatedly using words such as "amazing" and "prestigious" in the article is not encyclopedic in tone. Thank you. -- Kinu t/c 13:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Documentary films task force. -- Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 14:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Your ownership of this article is disruptive. Please stop introducing edits that contravene the stylistic guidelines at MOS:FILM or I will be forced to ask another editor to impose appropriate sanctions. -- <strong style="color:blue">Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 20:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. <strong style="color:blue">Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 21:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Radu1995 please start communicating at the article talk page, otherwise I may restrict your access to the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Ymblanter,

On 1 May 2021, the Wikipedia page of Untamed Romania had a few phrases, 6 footnotes, 14 hyperlinks and 1 external link for further reading — and it was not flagged in any way. And no vigilent talk was launched. Now, on 4 May 2021, the page has 11 full sections, 24 footnotes, 64 hyperlinks and 8 external links for further reading — and people are nervous. In other words, while an abandoned draft was considered perfectly fine, an articulated, well-documented page makes people lose sleep. Will I even get sued for immensely improving the page?
 * Please do not ascribe to me what I have never said. The problems are not with you improving the article but with your communication style.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear Ymblanter,

Here are some thoughts regarding my "communication style":

1) most of my edits are accompanied by very detailed descriptions

2) one contributor here says I do not reply to his messages. Actually, I was the one to first write to him — and he never replied. If you are interested, I can provide further detail regarding my attempt to reach him

3) you started this exchange by sending a warning. I started this exchange by saying Hello

4) before my edits, the Untamed Romania page was a ruin — and no one seemed to care. After I massively improved it, the page gets reported on all sorts of Wikipedia forums. And your first message even threatened to restrict my access to the article (!?)

Once again, my overall contribution:

— the page expanded from a few phrases to 11 full sections

— in stead of 6 sources, it now has 24

— in stead of 1 external link for further reading, it now has 8 external links

— in stead of 14 Wikilinks, it now has 64 Wikilinks

And, still, the page gets reported and flagged! I do not expect any apologies, of course — but I hope someone will have the decency to remove all these bizarre reports.

Best regards!
 * As indicated, the issue here is your lack of communication. You have never used the Talk namespace or the User talk namespace until now, so your comment that you were the first to communicate with me is disingenuous. The reason I posted at ANI was because you did not respond here or at the other discussion. Regardless, now that you have replied, perhaps you can provide an explanation for the concerns I have raised numerous times, such as why you repeatedly edit-war to introduce edits that contravene the Manual of Style and other guidelines such as those linked here and in the other discussion. While you have made positive contributions, which I acknowledged at the very beginning of this exchange, you do not own this article, and repeatedly reverting content to your preferred versions, many of which contain stylistic and tone issues, is disruptive. -- <strong style="color:blue">Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 14:25, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear Ymblanter,

Two of the contributors here complain I do not engage in any exchange. However, I was the first to write to them (via e-mail, on 2 May 2021, 19.52, London time). Sending that e-mail, and therefore trying to have an exchange with them, is what they call my "lack of communication" (they did not reply anyway, as they were busy reporting and flagging the page).

Yesterday, one of the contributors added to the page a phrase consisting in only five words (and no verb): „The actual release data of“. This is verbatim the sentence he published on the page. Nevertheless, the contributor keeps complaining about the language in my edits — which is kind of funny.

Yesterday, one of the contributors added a false information about a scholar mentioned in the page (he claimed, with no basis, that the scholar had a PhD in Biology). Though I myself never made this kind of error, the contributor keeps claiming my edits are disruptive — which is kind of funny.

Yesterday, one of the contributors falsely claimed I added a poorly worded expression: "doctor of biology". Though this expression has never been added by anyone on the page, the contributor suggests my comments are to be called disingenuous — which is kind of funny.

Long story short, building an entire page is bad, while reporting and flagging it is good. I must admit I am pretty impressed.

Best regards!
 * I have an impression that you do not hear what others tell you. Please make an effort.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you sent me an e-mail as you claim, then I did not receive it. The preferred method of communication for nonprivate matters is via talk pages. That aside, in this edit you wholesale reverted my edit; yes, there was a typo and I left stray text when moving things around, and while fixing it is appreciated, your comment here assumes bad faith. Things can happen accidentally when there is a edit conflict during a heavy-edit phase of an article. Likewise, I admit you did not use the precise phrase "doctor of biology," but you did use "doctor in biology"; this was a misread on my part after rewording a statement by you for better flow. Likewise, the alleged "false information" was based on my best guess as to what you were trying to say (and, perhaps, the assumption that someone who is the "dean of biology" is a biologist and has a biology degree, I suppose). Instead of assuming good faith, you have shown that you would prefer to wholesale revert edits to your preferred version instead of working with other editors to improve the quality of the tone and organization of the article, and you still haven't addressed the issues about your editing vis-à-vis the Manual of Style. At least you are now responding, which is appreciated, but as Ymblanter suggests, you aren't listening to what you're being told here. I'm not trying to pull rank here, but I have been editing here for 16 years, and if I was being intentionally disingenuous as you claim, I probably wouldn't be here right now. Meanwhile, your account was created three days ago. My goal is improving the quality of this article, and I believe yours is too, but sometimes it is a good idea to take a step back and listen to what established editors tell you about policies and guidelines, and respond accordingly. -- <strong style="color:blue">Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 18:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Based on this edit summary (a revert of my request for detail, and mocking me for previously indicating that a large chunk of biographical content may be undue in this article—if you insist on including it, let's not be vague) and this edit summary (again, undoing my correction to make the article more in line with the Manual of Style with a nonsensical claim than an acronym must contain periods), I'm beginning to wonder if you're intentionally being disruptive at this point. This seems like it's turning into a WP:POINT issue. -- <strong style="color:blue">Kinu  <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 06:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Radu1995, may be I was not sufficiently clear, let me be very clear this thie. If this continues, I will block your account from editing Untamed Romania. If you do not understand what this means, you are welcome to ask, but you have given a lot of details in this thread. Communication only via edit summaries is not acceptable in our project, and blank reverts, even accompanied by summaries, are still edit warring.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:34, 5 May 2021 (UTC)