User talk:RadziMuhammad Ali

July 2021
Hello, I'm Ab207. An edit that you recently made to Raj Tarun seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Ab207 (talk) 08:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nagendra Babu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   -- DaxServer (talk) 08:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Ishq (2021 film), you may be blocked from editing.   -- DaxServer (talk) 09:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Ishq (2021 film) does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! BOVINEBOY 2008 18:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Satish Kumar SK


A tag has been placed on Satish Kumar SK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Teja Sajja, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Ab207 (talk) 05:52, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   — DaxServer (talk to me) 11:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rowdy have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rowdy was changed by RadziMuhammad Ali (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952377 on 2022-02-19T08:27:08+00:00

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Teja Sajja, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 09:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Article hijack
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Rowdy. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 09:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

To create an article, please use wp:Article for creation Thank you Adakiko (talk) 10:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice
— DaxServer (t · c) 12:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rowdy, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 03:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Teja Sajj, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Adakiko (talk) 03:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)