User talk:Rae4sunshine

File copyright problem with File:Coverage Map.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Coverage Map.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Coverage Map.pdf
Thank you for uploading File:Coverage Map.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Cverage map.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Cverage map.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Memeo


A tag has been placed on Memeo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 22:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Memeo


A tag has been placed on Memeo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche (talk) 23:02, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Living Spaces


A tag has been placed on Living Spaces, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  DGG ( talk ) 02:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I've seen your message and I'll reply tomorrow Jimfbleak - talk to me?  18:41, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Reply

 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.
 * Although you gave references, they were all placed at the end instead at the appropriate place in the text so it makes it hard to know what fact each is referencing
 * most of the the references, except the first, appear to be of low quality, simply reprinting your press releases
 * I get know sense of how this small local chain meets the criteria for notability linked above. Your article is little more than a list of stores, none of which is individually notable


 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * it's all about what the company sells and its locations, little about the company itself in the main text. How many employees? Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors? Note that two previous versions of this article have also been deleted
 * listing each store as a separate subsection looks spammy, especially when you are just telling us where they are and how large each is

The editor who nominated this for a speedy deletion and I both thought that the tone was promotional, and the references are mainly low quality. However, I've seen much worse and I'm prepared to recreate in a sandbox for you to improve if you wish me to. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:17, 8 April 2015 (UTC)