User talk:Rafagoto

April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to David Copperfield's flying illusion has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Aremith tlk 03:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Super Chair Suspension constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Aremith tlk 03:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Aremith. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Aremith tlk 03:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Multiplying billiard balls. Aremith tlk 03:38, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

May 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. --Justpassin (talk) 02:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Why I gave you the warning
I gave you the warning because you deleted a huge chunk of text, and it looked like vandalism from recent changes, and didn't leave an edit summary. Because your previous warnings and blocks, I thought you knew what you were doing. My apologies. I'll delete that warning and give you one less severe. --Justpassin (talk) 02:58, 19 May 2008 (UTC)