User talk:RafalMichalski

Hi and some comments
We occasionally have new editors that are authentic experts and even academicians. We welcome such contributions of course, but there are many potential problems that experts might encounter, so here is some advice (that you can take or ignore): Good luck, --Smokefoot (talk) 14:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Avoid big edits. Make small edits to gain experience.
 * Avoid citing any publication involving you or your close colleagues. It is called WP:COI.  Yes, I know that we know our own work very well, but Wikipedia is also exploited as a mechanism to advance peoples careers or remind others about our overlooked contributions.  Just stay away from that kind of stuff.
 * Wikipedia guidelines favor citing books and reviews. See WP:SECONDARY.
 * Wikipedia is NOT a lot of things. We are not a textbook. We are not a technical journal.  We ARE a source of general information on many topics.  See WP:NOT.

Nomination of Fine electronic structure for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fine electronic structure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fine electronic structure until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaoGo (talk) 09:01, 18 May 2018 (UTC)