User talk:Rafmarham

Of interest
I have loaded a pamphlet I have scanned to a personal wiki are I have;  try looking here. It will remain only for a short time. --Keith 17:54, 21 July 2011 (UTC) Its gone now --Keith 16:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Referencing and Television Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne
Hello and welcome. Wikipedia has many rules and conventions, but one of the most important ones is "cite your sources". It is unacceptable to add information, or to create a page, without references. As most of the information at Television Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, which you created, has been taken from Tyne Tees Television, perhaps you would like to also copy the references over. Best, The JPS talk to me  14:18, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for adding some references. There is a lot to learn on Wikipedia. 'External links' isn't good enough for references because the reader needs to be told the source of each piece of information. You should also be aware of our 'Reliable Sources' policy. Not every website is considered a reliable source. Facts that are supported by sources that fail our WP:RS criteria are likely to be challenged or removed. As a fan, and geek, I think that TV Ark and similar fansites are great, but I'm not sure that they pass the criteria outlined at WP:RS. If is better to source your information from reputable newspapers, books and academic journal papers. The JPS talk to me  22:43, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Usually, stuff from TVARK is stuff that i can verify, sych as a date or fact mentioned in a video, or in the case of this page, a scanned image of the IBA yearbook which contained the detail.Rafmarham (talk) 20:52, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That's fine -- put the primary source in a ref tag, such as: The original source is likely to be considered more reliable than TV Ark. Facts must be verifiable; you can't say 'I know it's true' -- you must direct readers to where they can verify the information for themselves. As I say, Wikipedia can be complicated. Stick with it... The JPS talk to me  10:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The other thing I'd suggest is, as a new user, is to use the talk pages of articles before making any major changes to the structure of articles. Sorry to nag you. I like your enthusiasm for this topic and you have the potential to be a good editor. I just want to guide you through some of Wikipedia's many policies and pitfalls. The JPS talk to me  21:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Additions to Tyne Tees Television
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, your recent edit to Wikipedia, specifically the one you made to Tyne Tees Television, has been reverted, because the information you have added could not be verified. If you are certain this information is correct, please add a reliable reference to verify the information.Thank you.

The JPS talk to me  09:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. Wikipedia's position is clear: do not add anything without references. If you can't reference it, don't add it regardless of how strongly you feel about it. WP:V and WP:RS are two important aspects of Wikipedia and we all must abide by them. I hope I have explained clearly enough: unsourced material is useless, and will be removed. Good luck. The JPS talk to me  17:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for adding sources. The other thing we must remember is that not all sources are considered 'reliable' -- see WP:RS. Although Andrew Bowden's site is very good, and probably accurate, I'm not sure that it meets the standards at WP:RS. Can you look at the criteria at WP:RS and suggest how that site can be considered a 'reliable source'? The JPS talk to me  17:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Sarah Jane Adventures Good Article
Hi Rafmarham I read your post about you thinking Sarah Jane Adventures is a Good Article. I agree with you and I have nominated it. If it turns out not to be a good article at least we will have feedback on what needs to be done to improve it. Thanks Sfxprefects (talk) 19:53, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

BBC Four idents
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of BBC Four idents, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.weather.com/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:38, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bbcwstv.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Bbcwstv.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 22:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of BBC properties, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. When you recently edited Southampton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Lewis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bbcwstv.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Bbcwstv.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Children in Need 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BBC Midlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Southampton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NHS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Bluestar (bus company), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 00:36, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Southampton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ESCR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canal & River Trust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Ouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uni-link, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Go Ahead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Totton College 2012 logo.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Totton College 2012 logo.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Children in Need 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BBC Midlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=586550126 your edit] to Scout Network may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Centre. In addition however, Network members are able to take part in local

Orphaned non-free image File:Unilink 2013 logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Unilink 2013 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:University Southampton Students Union SUSU Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:University Southampton Students Union SUSU Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CBBC 1994.png
 Thanks for uploading File:CBBC 1994.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CBBC 2002.png
 Thanks for uploading File:CBBC 2002.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BBC Homepage November 2011.png
 Thanks for uploading File:BBC Homepage November 2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SUSUtv 2010 logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SUSUtv 2010 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ferny Crofts Scout Activity Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservatory. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scouting in South East England, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Farnborough and Lyndhurst.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bbcwstv.png
Thanks for uploading File:Bbcwstv.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sea Scouts (The Scout Association), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cutter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Daily Mail
Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at University of Southampton Students' Union. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 19:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * It was more to record their 'reporting' of the incident along with the other newspapers that recorded it rather than being used as a reference of information in the article but thanks for bringing it to my attention. Rafmarham (talk) 22:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid I don't understand that explanation. The Daily Mail reference followed a statement from the student union so I don't see how the reference wasn't being "used as a reference of information in the article". Also, there's no mention of the Daily Mail's "reporting" in the text. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * One part of the sentence included a statement that the apology had been widely reported, hence why articles that reported on the story in a journalistic capacity were linked afterwards as references. I appreciate it was not necessary to link so many but this was more referring to the reported widely part as opposed to the quote and the actions themselves. As mentioned above I was not aware about the decision regarding the Mail in these uses and it is not something I would normally use as I have a low opinion of the Mail's reporting. I hope that has clarified it. Rafmarham (talk) 23:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification. But then I have to ask: Is the "widely reported" claim directly supported by the sources in the sense that they themselves state that the apology was "widely reported"? Or did you reach that conclusion by synthesis of the long list of references? If it's the latter, then that's probably original research. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BBC Select Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:BBC Select Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2021
--evrik (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2021
--evrik (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: October 2021
--evrik (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help!
The updates you did on Baden-Powell House were very good and appropriate. Thanks for that! Well done. Since I've not been in the UK for a very long time, I had totally missed all this sale and repurposing. Pity, but as can be expected.  Wim van Dorst  (talk)   Wim van Dorst   (talk)  21:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC).

Nomination of BBC Three idents for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BBC Three idents is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/BBC Three idents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ComplainingCamel (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of BBC Four idents for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BBC Four idents is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/BBC Four idents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ComplainingCamel (talk) 17:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2022
--evrik (talk)

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2022
--evrik (talk) 22:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: August 2022
--evrik (talk) August 1, 2022

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: January 2023
--evrik (talk) January 16, 2023

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for The Scout Association
The Scout Association has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Femke (alt) (talk) 09:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: March 2023
--evrik (talk) March 16, 2023

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2023
-- (talk)

Sent by using  at 16:41, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Baden-Powell House at FAR
Hey, I've opened a featured article review for Baden-Powell House, and article you've worked on, at Featured article review/Baden-Powell House/archive1. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 17:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2024
--evrik (talk) May 22, 2024

WIkiProject Doctor Who Newsletter: July 2024
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)