User talk:Rafreyna

AfC notification: Draft:OmniSense has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:OmniSense. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Rafreyna! Thank you for your contributions. I am CNMall41 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! CNMall41 (talk) 18:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Copyrights
Your article on the Persistent Threat Detection System has several sentences that are copied verbatim from their sources. While it is important to use reliable sources to verify the content of our Wikipedia articles, we must take care not to violate those sources' copyrights. A single sentence, copied verbatim, could be considered such a copyright violation. Rather, you should try to write articles in your own words, using the sources to verify the information but not to provide the prose. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Mirrors
Thanks for contributing to the article Ominsense ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru  (talk)  17:34, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Serenity Payload) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Serenity Payload, Rafreyna!

Wikipedia editor In Memoriam A.H.H. just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice work on the article! Some more sources would be great though, however it is still a good article. Good job!"

To reply, leave a comment on In Memoriam A.H.H.'s talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

In Memoriam A.H.H. What, you egg?. 18:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Persistent Threat Detection System


A tag has been placed on Persistent Threat Detection System requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/features/history/ptds.html;  https://www.army-technology.com/projects/persistent-threat-detection-system-us/   and    https://www.army.mil/article/82551/army_accepts_last_persistent_threat_detection_system_aerostat. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:44, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Are you a paid editor with a conflict of interest?
Hello Rafreyna. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rafreyna. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.

Copyright infringement
I can see that you are a new editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article FireFly Acoustic Threat Detection System. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The same applies to OmniSense. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of OmniSense
Hello, Rafreyna. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, OmniSense, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 22:50, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

MRAP Armor Weight Reduction Spiral (MAWRS) Program moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, MRAP Armor Weight Reduction Spiral (MAWRS) Program, is just chunks of text copied from other sources without proper attribution. You need to write the information in your own words, or if the sources have compatible licenses, provide proper attribution. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: OmniSense (July 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ravenswing was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OmniSense and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OmniSense, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:OmniSense Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ravenswing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:OmniSense reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

  Ravenswing   06:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enhanced Performance Round (August 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enhanced Performance Round and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Enhanced Performance Round, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Enhanced_Performance_Round Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RoySmith&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Enhanced_Performance_Round reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 13:56, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Persistent Threat Detection System (August 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Power~enwiki was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Persistent Threat Detection System and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Persistent Threat Detection System, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Persistent_Threat_Detection_System Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Power~enwiki&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Persistent_Threat_Detection_System reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 02:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Persistent Threat Detection System


A tag has been placed on Draft:Persistent Threat Detection System, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/features/history/ptds.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brad v  02:59, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of My Weather Impacts Decision Aid (MyWIDA) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Weather Impacts Decision Aid (MyWIDA) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/My Weather Impacts Decision Aid (MyWIDA) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 02:59, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Warrior Injury Assessment Mannequin


A tag has been placed on Warrior Injury Assessment Mannequin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 03:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Smart Weapon End-to-End Performance Model for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smart Weapon End-to-End Performance Model is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Smart Weapon End-to-End Performance Model until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 03:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Reusing Existing Natural Energy, Wind & Solar system (RENEWS)


A tag has been placed on Reusing Existing Natural Energy, Wind & Solar system (RENEWS), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 03:02, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Internet of Battle Things (IoBT) Collaborative Research Alliance (CRA)


A tag has been placed on Internet of Battle Things (IoBT) Collaborative Research Alliance (CRA), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 03:03, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Serenity Payload for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serenity Payload is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Serenity Payload until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 03:04, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Acoustic threat detection systems for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Acoustic threat detection systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Acoustic threat detection systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 03:06, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Internet of Battle Things (IoBT) Collaborative Research Alliance (CRA) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Internet of Battle Things (IoBT) Collaborative Research Alliance (CRA) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Internet of Battle Things (IoBT) Collaborative Research Alliance (CRA) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 06:11, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Suggestion
My thought has always been to get people to disclose that they are doing paid editing, with the disclosure being the most important thing. And then to figure that the disclosure alone will tend to make things go well, rather than the more stringent conditions promoted by many. And so thanks for disclosing that. I noticed that you have been doing an overwhelming amount of work; I just reverted one item. May I suggest slowing down a bit and being a bit more cautious? Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 01:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Detection of nerve agents
When you make additions to articles, please try to achieve balance, rather than writing a press release promoting a piece of technology. Where you work should have a library giving information on all significant methods used to detect nerve agents that written about in unclassified literature. Which piece of kit to use to detect nerve agents also depends on whether you are detecting them in the atmosphere, or as a liquid on the ground. Any section on the detection of nerve agents needs to mention both.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Your addition to Silicon carbide has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ''This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing.'' — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Rafreyna. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.  Please be sure to list all COI articles on your userpage, and to add the paid contributor tag to the talk pages of any articles with which you have a connection. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:42, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Creating articles for which you are being paid
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:05, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Robotics Collaborative Technology Alliance moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Robotics Collaborative Technology Alliance, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently, provided sources are either affiliated with the US military (not independent) or papers and patents ostensibly published thanks to the project's funding (not independent, not in depth coverage, arguably original research). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed,Rosguill talk 20:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Materials in Extreme Dynamic Environments Collaborative Research Alliance moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Materials in Extreme Dynamic Environments Collaborative Research Alliance, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Micro Autonomous Systems and Technology (MAST) Collaborative Technology Alliance moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Micro Autonomous Systems and Technology (MAST) Collaborative Technology Alliance, does not sufficiently indicate notability to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:35, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:OmniSense


Hello, Rafreyna. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:OmniSense.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Enhanced Performance Round


Hello, Rafreyna. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Enhanced Performance Round.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 06:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Micro Autonomous Systems and Technology (MAST) Collaborative Technology Alliance


Hello, Rafreyna. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Micro Autonomous Systems and Technology (MAST) Collaborative Technology Alliance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 00:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Robotics Collaborative Technology Alliance concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robotics Collaborative Technology Alliance, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)