User talk:Ragamuf12

Tata Consultancy Services
Your recent editing history at Tata Consultancy Services shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 15:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Your editing.
I've noticed at Tata Consultancy Services that you are removing sources, which is not the proper way to fix what you call a POV. An example is: ''TCS is one of the largest publicly traded company in India by market capitalisation. '' which you removed. You don't just remove that. If you have cites that show they have shrunk in size, you would add that cite, and change the wording to past tense. Simply deleting references and claiming there is a POV issue, then refusing to discuss it on the talk page, however, is considered disruptive editing. I strongly suggest you leave it in for now, take your concerns to the talk page of the article and discuss it there, and see if you can find a compromise. This would be in the spirit of WP:BRD, Be Bold, Revert, Discuss, which is one of the main principles of how we edit and get along here. Otherwise, if you just keep removing material without discussing, you may be blocked. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   (WER) 11:34, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Abusing multiple accounts. See Sockpuppet investigations/Ragamuf12. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   (WER) 20:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)