User talk:Ragesoss/Archive11

Maybe of interest
Batts SA, Anthis NJ, Smith TC (2008) Advancing Science through Conversations: Bridging the Gap between Blogs and the Academy. PLoS Biol 6(9): e240 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060240

== Studies on the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types: Induction of Transformation by a Desoxyribonucleic Acid Fraction Isolated from Pneumococcus Type III listed at RfD == An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Studies on the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types: Induction of Transformation by a Desoxyribonucleic Acid Fraction Isolated from Pneumococcus Type III. Since you had some involvement with the Studies on the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types: Induction of Transformation by a Desoxyribonucleic Acid Fraction Isolated from Pneumococcus Type III redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). -- Suntag  ☼  17:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 4be0f8f472d061712afbf717096c1299
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 63
Hello! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 63, an interview with Florence Devouard, has been released. You can listen and comment at the episode's page and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes at wikipediaweekly.org.  W ODU P bot  07:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

Journal papers discussion
Would you be interested in Wikipedia talk:Notability? Carcharoth (talk) 14:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Joe the plumber: Your sort of famous
your sort of famous:

http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/wikipedia_vs_joe_the_plumber.php

FYI: Talk:Joe_the_Plumber Inclusionist (talk) 20:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

History of chromatography
I was trying to work out what partition chromatography was in relation to this Nobel Prize, and just after I redirected it to chromatography (it seems to cover a general class of chromatography techniques, but more specifically the ones that started the modern field of chromatography), I found User:Ragesoss/History of chromatography. So I thought you might like to turn the redirect into a short article or section somewhere. I was trying to link it from the 1952 entry at List of Nobel Laureates in Chemistry, but I'm now thinking that they really invented modern chromatography. i.e. Their work was the basis for what followed. But if you could quickly help out here, that would be good. If you are interested, you could also review the hours of work I put in on linking the stuff in the citation (or rationale) column at List of Nobel Laureates in Chemistry. I did want to put the links in a "further reading" column, rather than pipe the links inside the quotes, but it is up for 'featured list' status, and I don't want to change things too much. Some of the links were wrong, though, or just too general, so I think what I've done there so far does point people towards the best places in Wikipedia to read about the Nobel stuff. But I am trying to get second opinions. Carcharoth (talk) 19:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * For example, for the 1948 entry for Arne Wilhelm Kaurin Tiselius, I linked "adsorption techniques" to thin-layer chromatography, on the basis of this Nobel presentation speech. But I am not 100% sure of that. I did notice, though, that that presentation speech did mention Tsvett, if that helps at all. Like partition chromatography, adsorption chromatography seems to be a general term and currently redirects to chromatography, which, unless you are an expert in chromatography, is not helpful! Carcharoth (talk) 20:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. Wasn't rambling at all - was very helpful! I removed the piped link behind "adsorption analysis" as this is not clear. The link to electrophoresis is enough, though it would be nice to see something on Tiselius in the history of chromatography. I agree about the Nobel Lectures - some care is needed. Though reading up on and linking to such lectures can be very helpful. Another series I came across was the "Lister Oration". Have a look at Lister Medal. I'm currently failing to track down the most recent three medallists. You would have thought the awarding institution would have a list online, but no luck it seems. Most of the work behind that list can be seen at Talk:Lister Medal. Some other science history stuff at Rede Lecture, Robert Muir (pathologist), and Robert E. M. Hedges (well, he's not really history, at least not yet, but he was a red link at Royal Medal, so I created a stub). It is Lister Medal that I'm really quite keen to take a bit further. Any advice on which of the bits on the talk page I should bring over into the main article? I have a table I've been preparing offline, so I'll paste that in now and let you see what you think. What I'm not sure about is how much of the non-RCSE Lister stuff to mention (do some searches and you will see that there are many in other countries - though I suspect they are all "Commonwealth" or "Empire" countries that did Lister "memorial stuff" inspired by the original Lister Memorial Fund set up by the Royal Society. There is a link on the talk page to the history of that Fund, showing donations from all around the Empire. Hmm. Enough to add to a newsletter? :-) Carcharoth (talk) 23:18, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The "less uncritically celebratory" project sounds a great idea. There are some real characters in the histories when you keep going. Some of the ones I came across were Robert Burns Woodward (several priority disputes and this is hilarious). And I was reading Elias James Corey and ended up reading this article. As an undergraduate, I did a final-year research project in a chemistry research laboratory, and though I didn't work in organic chemistry, I recognise the same sorts of egos and single-minded scientists being mentioned in those articles. Moving on to physics, tt might be apocryphal, but the story at Nuclear transmutation about Soddy and Rutherford really brings things to life. And to finish on a heart-warming note, Luis Federico Leloir sounds like really nice guy. Sorry. Will let you get back to your dissertation now! :-) Carcharoth (talk) 00:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 64
Hello! Good news, Wikipedia Weekly Episode 64 has been released. You can listen and comment at the episode's page and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes at wikipediaweekly.org.  W ODU P bot  05:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

NYC Meetup: You are invited!
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, finalize and approve bylaws, interact with representatives from the Software Freedom Law Center, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the June meeting's minutes and the September meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikis Take Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wikipedia Loves Art! bonanza, being planned with the Brooklyn Museum for February.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 65
Hey! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 65: Censorship while you sleep has been released. You can listen and comment at the episode's page and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes at wikipediaweekly.org. WODUPbot 05:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

AfD nomination of Light as a feather, stiff as a board
An article that you have been involved in editing, Light as a feather, stiff as a board, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Light as a feather, stiff as a board. Thank you. Kan8eDie (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Most popular nonexistent articles?
Hello ragesoss, I am referring to User_talk:Erik_Zachte; please see Most_missed_articles :-) --- Sadly much "spam" stuff in it though, Melancholie (talk) 17:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * After an update yesterday, the list is based on a 149 day period (5 months) now. By making use of the JavaScript mentioned on very top, almost all searches would be counted as well; resulting in a much cleaner list. --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 21:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

John Willis Fleming (disambiguation)
Articles for deletion/John Willis Fleming (disambiguation). Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 22:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Cost per Day== An editor has asked for a deletion review of Cost per Day. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ==

Concerning the proposed deletion of Cost per Day.

I have zero connection to this company and in no way was trying to promote their products or services. I am a surveyor of the Digital Signage industry as a whole and find their approach mathematical, analytical and scientific and I wanted to share that with others here on wikipedia, in a attempt to see if others would add their knowledge about the algorithmic formula they employ.

Please restore. thank you.

Joshua

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 66
Hey! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 66: Searching High and Low has been released. You can listen and comment at the episode's page and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes at wikipediaweekly.org. WODUPbot 07:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

History of Science!
As it happens, I'm about to enter the graduate program at ASU in history of science, specifically biology -- so yeah, I'd be very willing to help out with the History of Science project. Isn't Wikipedia almost entirely written by graduate students? :) Ceramufary (talk) 20:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 67
Hey! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 67: Fundraising Interview has been released. You can listen and comment at the episode's page and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes at wikipediaweekly.org. W ODU Pbot 06:58, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

Church of Life
Hi, could you please put a copy of the deleted Church of Life article in my user space? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vmcphail (talk • contribs) 08:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)