User talk:Ragini laksh

September 2016
Hello, I'm NgYShung. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Adhuri Kahaani Hamari, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NgYShung huh? 10:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Udaan (2014 TV series). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Udaan (2014 TV series) was changed by Ragini laksh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865687 on 2016-09-01T10:47:57+00:00.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shakti — Astitva Ke Ehsaas Ki. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diffs: "Rocked the trp charts" is inappropriate tone for an encyclopedia, and even if it had been presented neutrally, which would be required, the content is unsourced. Same thing here and here and here. '' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Swaragini - Jodein Rishton Ke Sur, you may be blocked from editing. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Swaragini - Jodein Rishton Ke Sur. ''Diff: Not sure how to make this any clearer for you, but the next time you add an opinion to an article that is not sourced or directly attributed to a specific voice, I will have to interrupt your editing privileges. "Very good TRPs" is subjective, not a fact. If you want to present data, like that the series was the highest-rated series in India or on Colors TV, and compare that data to other data, that's fine, but calling something "very good" is an opinion. Describing the series as "one of the popular shows" is also an opinion. Who decided that it was popular? You? Contrarily, saying that it is the third highest-rated series on Colors (or whatever the case may be) and supporting that with reliable sources that quantify the ratings data, presents objective information. If you can't distinguish between these ideas, you're going to have problems at Wikipedia.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)