User talk:Ragnarok42007

October 2017
Hello, I'm Smartse. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Cosmo Jarvis, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. One tweet by the subject is not evidence of there being a controversy. SmartSE (talk) 12:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I will ask again that you read our policy on how we write about living people. This is not the place to air your grievances about a tweet, however distasteful, unless it has been discussed by reliable sources (which it has not). It is your own opinion that this is a controversy, which is not how things work here. You are now edit warring to include it in the article and if you continue you will likely be blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 14:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Ambox notice.svg There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. SmartSE (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Cosmo Jarvis. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:43, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

And I want to add a further warning about making personal attacks on other Wikipedia editors like "Clear attempt at assisting in a cover-up and perpetuation of rape culture". Such attacks are not tolerated, and any repetition is likely to get you blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)