User talk:Ragtacoman

March 2015
Hello, I'm PhantomTech. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of colors: A–F— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Phantom Tech (talk) 00:41, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of colors: A–F. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of colors: A–F was changed by Ragtacoman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958337 on 2015-03-03T00:42:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:42, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of colors: A-F:. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. 84.51.184.208 (talk) 00:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of colors: A–F with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Kharkiv07 (talk) 00:45, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to List of colors: A–F. Tutelary (talk) 00:46, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:48, 3 March 2015 (UTC)