User talk:Rahid98

November 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Graham Hancock. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Deism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 16:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 12:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

"he serMinister to France, the first US poirst U.S. Misident of Pennsylvania.t posts.r to France"
That's part of your post at Committee of Five. It's gibberish. Between that and your failure to use sources, etc, I'm not sure you are capable of editing here. Doug Weller talk 16:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for problems with English, changing sourced text, copyright violation, general competence. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 16:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Your edit to English coffeehouses in the 17th and 18th centuries has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Doug Weller talk 16:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Okay, I understand the concern related to the blocking. I will refrain from making unnecessary edits, please at least remove the block or reduce the expiry date of the block from infinity. Rahid98 (talk) 17:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 40467
This user is requesting unblocking at -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 21:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Please consider unblocking Rahid98 (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC) 

has been declined. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time.

We do not edit at the behest of the subjects of articles, especially when the request is to legitimatize pseudoscience.

We presume any content that does not explicitly state a free license to be copyrighted. Please elaborate on this issue on your talk page.

You will need to understand how to contribute constructively without asking each time.

As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. Place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here". . Thank you for your attention to these matters.