User talk:Rahio1234

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Ergzay (talk) 11:06, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Using and  templates in Twinkle on stub pages
Hi Rahio1234, I reverted several of your changes on several stub pages where you added citation templates. As the instructions on   state: Citing only one source is not a violation of any policy. Consider not adding this tag to stubs, articles that are being actively expanded, or articles that have no apparent problems with verifiability and neutrality. I would suggest that you not add those templates to stub pages that don't seem to have obvious issues with their verifiability or neutrality. Those pages need to be expanded, not have additional sources added for their already slim content. Ergzay (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Harrassment
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at User:Ergzay, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your recent edits  on my user page, blanking it and then reverting it are harrasment. Do not do that.'' Ergzay (talk) 16:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Ergzay (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Oh no, What happened  Rah ' io ' 1234  07:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Your user talk page (this page) is not the forum to discuss an issue that is at WP:ANI. If you don't know what happened (but you do know what happened), you can look at WP:ANI, and you should look at WP:ANI anyway.  Robert McClenon (talk) 13:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Star  Mississippi  14:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Final unblock request

 * Please don't decline my unblock  Rah ' io ' 1234  07:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You are not permitted to edit or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. If you do so again, you will lose access to your talk page. You get no further warnings about this. --Yamla (talk) 09:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Yamla Why. i have create a new account and sockpuppet?  Rah ' io ' 1234  09:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * This is incoherent. --Yamla (talk) 09:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Yamla Can you look into his claim that he's created a separate account and a sockpuppet account? Ergzay (talk) 01:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * No CU evidence for that at this time. --Yamla (talk) 09:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Yamla Looks like there was one apparently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yandrex688 Ergzay (talk) 15:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Could be a joe-job.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.