User talk:Rahlgd

Dies ist meine Diskussionsseite

Hahahaha...
I laughed when I saw your page. :P --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 10:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Possible identity issues
Hello, just in case we run into issues, I've edited your userpage a bit. I've realised that if I were to google for my name, it comes up with your userpage. I have replaced all text with sample texts, removed all references to my identity (such as contact details), without changing the layout. I don't mind you using the layout, just be sure to change the HTML colour codes around, just a bit, so that your page becomes more original (e.g. you can make it blue, or green...), and if you like, switch around with the section layouts. Kindest regards, --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 01:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum
Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 05:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Template:Largest cities of Brazil
Hi. I'm concerned about the current version of this template. It appears not to have links to any sources and mentions 2006 estimates, but replaced a version with a link to an apparently valid 2008 source. Also, the current version, and the original version you installed in August, have an obvious error for Duque de Caxias, which another editor corrected (or, at least, made more reasonable) and has reversed wikilinks, which another editor corrected. Your most recent change undid those apparent improvements. Can you explain this? As things stand now, it would be better to return to the 2008 sourced version and make whatever detailed improvements you want to make starting with that base. Celestra (talk) 22:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Your edit summary today gave me hope that the problems I pointed out above had been addressed. I am sorry to see that is not the case. Merely changing the date to claim that the values are more current is not helpful since the 2008 estimates do not agree with the table. Please provide a source for your information or back out your changes. I'm copying these messages to the template talk page. Celestra (talk) 20:17, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. Now I understand where the values you used are supposed to come from. I don't think that we should use the values from the various pages in a single table, since that means the table may have 2009 data for one city and 2008 data for a different city. Also, a quick check shows that three of the first four values don't match the pages and the population on the Sao Paulo page, for instance, doesn't match the source. I think we should return to the 2008 estimates and drop the unsourced metropolitan numbers. Does that sound agreeable to you? Celestra (talk) 19:52, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Annual income chart
Hello, there are two requests in your chart's talkpage asking for some sources supporting the information shown, so you're welcome to provide the sources for that chart; otherwise it could be removed from Wikipedia, regards. Supaman89 (talk) 00:01, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

T-90
Please check the date and content of your sources. The deal was -finalized- on Sept 14, 2009 for T-72s -only-. All of your sources -predate- Sept 14, and are -speculation- on what Venezuela may buy, not confirmation of sales. This does not constitute a valid source. Please see: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090914/wl_afp/venezuelarussiamilitaryweapons_20090914104449 the source I provided. Thanks. - Jonathon A H (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Again, please check your dates. Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopedia, thus based on fact.  Listing Venezuela as an operator is disingenuous as it is not the case.  They do not operate them, and until you have proof of an actual deal, it is not right to list them as an operator.  A source dated Sept 14, the most recent source listed, states that Venezuela did not buy T-90s, and signed a deal for T-72s only.  Please consider this before making changes again. -Jonathon A H (talk) 18:31, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. First of all, I created a section on the T-90 talk page for discussion on the talk page.  Second of all, you're still failing to address the point that until a deal is signed, this is speculation.  Stating they wish to buy something is different from actually purchasing it.  There is a deal for the T-72s, thus it's fair to list Venezuela as an operator of T-72s, there is not a deal for T-90s.  One may be signed in the future, but it does not exist now, so listing Venezuela as an operator is not proper.  Venezuela should be removed from the operators list until a deal is finalized.-Jonathon A H (talk) 18:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Image of mestizos
Hello:

Native Mexicans (aka "Indigenous People") are not the second largest ethnic group in Mexico. Having a big picture depicting several Native Mexicans is just pure and plain Undue Weight. Unfortunately INEGI does not keep track of "race" in Mexico as it is seen politically incorrect and kinda racist. Also according to other sources, "whites" are the second largest group in Mexico and growing, meanwhile Native Mexicans are decreasing.

But most importantly as I have said, there's already a picture showing ethnic diversity. You're free to add that picture in the corresponding article, but seems too much for a subsection.  Alex Covarrubias  ( Talk? )  00:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Gradiente
Where did you get the information that Gradiente which is bankrupt is manufacturing the PlayStation 3? :) --Rhe br (talk) 12:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Where did you get the information that Gradiente with a $7.521 billion profit in 2009 was bankrupt? Rahlgd (talk) 23:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Irrelevant content in Mexico
Fellow Wikipedian Rahlgd, please pay attention to the discussion going on the talk page of Mexico. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cerealito (talk • contribs) 20:49, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 10:02, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Latin America
Rahlgd, I'll take a closer look at your latest changes later. But I see that you're not reusing references properly.

Let's take this reference (ignore the "nowiki" tags in the code; don't use them):. If you want to use it to reference a second or more statements, all you have to do is give it a name in the first place:. Then you only have to use the name after that: Scientists have discovered that most people like food that tastes good.  You see? You won't have to use the whole text of the reference every time. The end product will look like any statement with a reference, of course: Scientists have discovered that most people like food that tastes good.1|[1] SamEV (talk) 21:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC); 19:26, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Also could you provide a ref for the statement that LatAm is more developed than China? That's interesting stuff, but without a source it would have to be removed. SamEV (talk) 21:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I tagged it with a citation request. SamEV (talk) 19:26, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Make sure to provide titles for longer URLs. There was a bare URL which I can only characterize as monstrous. Look at this: before (go to the "References" section and look at ref #75) and after (look at ref #75 again). This is all I did to make that happen:. Cheers. SamEV (talk) 19:26, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Good luck. SamEV (talk) 04:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Problem, actually. I saw a message at Talk:Latin America which alerted me to issues with the data. I made some attempts to verify and the results were not encouraging. So I'm going to restore the previous version until those issues are worked out. I'll continue trying to help if I'm able.

Have you seen List of cities by GDP? Maybe you could find some more sources there. SamEV (talk) 06:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm working on a new version of the ethnic dist. table, here (diff). Any suggestions? SamEV (talk) 03:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Your help is requiered
Hello Rahlgd. I need your help in the article Trillion dollar club. Some anonymous user is deleting Mexico from the list. I used the source you added to the article Mexico, from the World Bank, to prove that Mexico is a trillion dollar economy as of 2009.

That user keep deleting the source. So I need your help to keep the source, which is valid and verifiable. Thank you.  Alex Covarrubias  ( Talk? )  21:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Leopard 2a7.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Leopard 2a7.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 19:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Leopard 2 Evolution.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Leopard 2 Evolution.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 19:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

An award
GLEE!!!!!! Rahlgd (talk) 03:53, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Aztec restored architecture.jpg (Caption Needs to be Revised)
The image you placed on Mexico's Page is not Aztec architecture, it is actually "Talud-Tablero architecture" typical of Teotihuacano culture. The restored temple in the National Museum of Anthropology of Mexico City is a representation of the "Temple of Quetzalcoatl" found in Teotihuacan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.64.33.183 (talk) 05:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, i saw it there a long time ago and had this nagging feeling that it wasnt Aztec when i uploaded it but didnt remember what civilization had built it. Thanks for the heads up!Rahlgd (talk) 05:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

City Population
Hi, Rahlgd

I see you made some edits at List of metropolitan areas by population.

I am the groundskeeper at World's largest municipalities by population. We are always interested in the latest official data for the population within the strict administrative boundaries of a city, along with proper references. No agglomeration, no metropolises. Strict city population within defined city limits. Any assistance would be appreciated. Thank you! -- BsBsBs (talk) 05:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Mesoamerican languages
Thanks for taking an interest in wikipedias articles about Mesoamerica. Your edits changing the phonological descriptions in articles about Mesoamerican languages such as those you made to Nahuatl, Classical Nahuatl language, Otomí language and Zapotecan languages are not helpful and have been reverted by several different editors. Your transcription scheme is not one that is currently recognized by any groups of linguists or by the indigenous groups themselves and it is confusing rather than informative. If you have any arguments based on wikipedia policies in favour of including those transcriptions you should present them on the talk page before making the edits to see if other editors agree, failure to discuss such changes before implementing them will simply result in your edits being reverted. Thanks. ·Maunus· ƛ · 13:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Re. "Didxažon Mǎsěvalätǒli" You have been repeatedly told by several editors with professional level knowledge of Mesoamerican indigenous languages that your spelling reforms are not commonly used in authoritative sources either in Mexico or outside (in fact I have not been able to find even non-authoritative sources using them). Please stop trying to include these spellings in wikipedia, or if you insist make a discussion in the right forum e.g. the talk page of the articles about the language in question or in a general forum such as Wikiproject Mesoamerica and try to get consensus to include the spellings by providing authoritative sources that use those spellings. ·Maunus· ƛ · 21:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok I see you actually have a source for Dižaxon which means Zoogocho Zapotec in Zoogocho Zapotec (you were spelling it wrong as Didxažon). However this is the English wikipedia and we of course use the prevalent English names for languages - in this case the English name is Zoogocho Zapotec.·Maunus· ƛ · 12:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello, about Mexican army
Wow is it true that stuff about the Mexican hidden military budget? I was shocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlakuache (talk • contribs) 09:27, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh I see I was fascinated with the stats Tlakuache (talk) 14:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Hola Rah I see that the article Mexico is under a major picture improvement effort so I wanted to ask you if you have better pictures for the Mexican Congress? The current picture is very ugly and does not show the front of the chamber of deputies with the two big flags which is the most promiment feature of the chamber. Tlakuache (talk) 05:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello again. I just learnt how to upload pictures. Is it ok if I modify some in the article Mexico? I'm glad I can edit it now. Tlakuache (talk) 05:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh and I forgot to tell you that they created a new project about North America I want to join and I thought that you would also want to join. I've seen that you are a very dedicated editor. They left an invitation in the Mexico talk article. Tlakuache (talk) 05:53, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

It's San Pedro, not Monterrey
Hi! Thank you for uploading pics and information on the Monterrey, Mexico page. Just a heads up: I edited some info on one of your pic files: it stated that what was shown was the "city Center", when it is actually part of the municipality of San Pedro. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valdezlopez (talk • contribs) 16:59, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

RPG-29 If you're the person that is adding that the RPG-29 is being built under license by the SDN please refrain yourself of doing that until you have a proper source to back that claim up, at the moment there is none. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.151.50.61 (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject North America
 Alex Covarrubias  ( Talk? )  08:26, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Axav script
What's this about? I see no source for this. Dougweller (talk) 08:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Rahlgd please stop your nonsensical additions to articles about indigenous languages. It is becoming very difficult to keep assuming good faith when half of your additions are copyright violations or something very similar to hoaxes.·Maunus· ƛ · 14:03, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Mexico and weapons of mass destruction
Rahgld, I think the information you found is very interesting. It definitely belongs in the article Mexico and I was wondering if you could help me to create the article Mexico and weapons of mass destruction (which currently hasn't been created).

We should make it look like this exampled Argentina and weapons of mass destruction or Brazil and weapons of mass destruction, two Latin American examples.  Alex Covarrubias  ( Talk? )  05:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Sure, it think thats a great idea, i'm not very knowledgeable about Mexico's chemical or biological weapons, although they probably do have at least some chemical weapons if they went as far as developing nuclear weapon. Have you started an article? Rahlgd (talk) 05:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

ANI
I have started a thread at Ani about our recent dispute at Template talk:Ethnicity in Mexico and Talk:Nahua people.·Maunus· ƛ · 17:56, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Mexican Paratroopers with the RPG-29.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mexican Paratroopers with the RPG-29.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

blocked
Until we have sorted out what was up with this edit, I have blocked both you and your other account User:Mapudunganpanzer for sockpuppetry. Gwen Gale (talk) 18:44, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BTR Mexicano.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:BTR Mexicano.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MGA73 (talk) 20:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Skyline futuro de Monterrey.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Skyline futuro de Monterrey.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 03:50, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Ciudad de Mexico Gran.png
Thank you for uploading File:Ciudad de Mexico Gran.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 03:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Palacio de Hierro.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:Palacio de Hierro.PNG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 03:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Mexican Police Sprinter.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Mexican Police Sprinter.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://picasaweb.google.com/georgiabees/PoliceDeptGAFLALSheriffStatePatrolCarCopsK9PhotosLawEnforcementJailPrisonSWAT#5543533632615809522. As a copyright violation, File:Mexican Police Sprinter.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Mexican Police Sprinter.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Mexican Police Sprinter.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Mexican Police Sprinter.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Mexican Police Sprinter.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 20:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Guardia Ceremonial.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Guardia Ceremonial.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from Photo stolen from Agencia Andes, see http://andes.info.ec/fotos/24MAYO2327 (photo 1365 of 2522 ). As a copyright violation, File:Guardia Ceremonial.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Guardia Ceremonial.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Guardia Ceremonial.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Guardia Ceremonial.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Guardia Ceremonial.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 21:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Monterrey Photoshop3.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Monterrey Photoshop3.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from grabbed from http://www.skyscraperlife.com/city-versus-city/36198-monterrey-vs-santiago-vs-amsterdam-vs-curitiba-vs-medellin-5.html#post1632128. As a copyright violation, File:Monterrey Photoshop3.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Monterrey Photoshop3.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Monterrey Photoshop3.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Monterrey Photoshop3.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Monterrey Photoshop3.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2011 (UTC)


 * The main problem with this image is, that other peoples relied on your lies already and reused your stolen upload. Thats a real shame. --Martin H. (talk) 21:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Builds b.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Builds b.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from See Watermark. As a copyright violation, File:Builds b.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Builds b.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Builds b.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Builds b.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Builds b.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 21:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:BTR-70 Mexicano.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:BTR-70 Mexicano.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from stolen from http://modelismolatino.creatuforo.com/btr-infanteria-de-marina-mexicana-tema1963.html. As a copyright violation, File:BTR-70 Mexicano.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:BTR-70 Mexicano.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:BTR-70 Mexicano.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:BTR-70 Mexicano.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:BTR-70 Mexicano.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 21:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Ciudad Monterrey.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ciudad Monterrey.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from good retouch from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=21026019&postcount=2029, but not own work.. As a copyright violation, File:Ciudad Monterrey.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ciudad Monterrey.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Ciudad Monterrey.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Ciudad Monterrey.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Ciudad Monterrey.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 21:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Santa lucia river.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Santa lucia river.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from grabbed from http://www.skyscraperlife.com/city-versus-city/30329-guatemala-monterrey-guadalajara-vs-quito-guayaquil-medellin.html#post1186835 (1st 1/4 of that page, titled "Santa Lucia, Restaurants Section"). As a copyright violation, File:Santa lucia river.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Santa lucia river.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Santa lucia river.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Santa lucia river.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Santa lucia river.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 21:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Monterey Ciudad.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Monterey Ciudad.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=210491. As a copyright violation, File:Monterey Ciudad.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Monterey Ciudad.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Monterey Ciudad.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Monterey Ciudad.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Monterey Ciudad.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 22:01, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Monterrey ponoramic.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Monterrey ponoramic.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=36624442&postcount=1033. As a copyright violation, File:Monterrey ponoramic.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Monterrey ponoramic.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Monterrey ponoramic.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Monterrey ponoramic.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Monterrey ponoramic.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 22:11, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Ciudad Victoria Central.png
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ciudad Victoria Central.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/908868. As a copyright violation, File:Ciudad Victoria Central.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ciudad Victoria Central.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Ciudad Victoria Central.png and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Ciudad Victoria Central.png with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Ciudad Victoria Central.png.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 22:15, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Avemajestuosaflamamargi.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Avemajestuosaflamamargi.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/hotu_matua/4205838415/. As a copyright violation, File:Avemajestuosaflamamargi.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Avemajestuosaflamamargi.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Avemajestuosaflamamargi.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Avemajestuosaflamamargi.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Avemajestuosaflamamargi.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Crowded suburb Mexico DF.png
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Crowded suburb Mexico DF.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=41204882&postcount=50, stolen from the internet like all other uploads by this user.. As a copyright violation, File:Crowded suburb Mexico DF.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Crowded suburb Mexico DF.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Crowded suburb Mexico DF.png and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Crowded suburb Mexico DF.png with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Crowded suburb Mexico DF.png.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 22:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Military police of Mexico.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Military police of Mexico.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/eliasarriazola/3980938204/in/set-72157622267727511. As a copyright violation, File:Military police of Mexico.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Military police of Mexico.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Military police of Mexico.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Military police of Mexico.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Military police of Mexico.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 22:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Mastretta MXT.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Mastretta MXT.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/tigerland54/2710098901/. As a copyright violation, File:Mastretta MXT.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Mastretta MXT.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Mastretta MXT.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Mastretta MXT.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Mastretta MXT.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 22:28, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Aztec restored architecture.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Aztec restored architecture.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/juan_de/3296668157/in/photostream. As a copyright violation, File:Aztec restored architecture.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Aztec restored architecture.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Aztec restored architecture.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Aztec restored architecture.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Aztec restored architecture.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 22:40, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Addition
Size of flickr file: 500x456px, size of Wikipedia upload: 481x413px. why is it smaller? Obviously because you cutted away a watermark. Guy, you are stealing! And you not even have the shame to remove protection measures implemented by legal owners to protect their work. What the hell are you doing on this project?! This is not the right place for such illegal activities and its not what we normaly do here. Therefore this is not the right place for persons like you. --Martin H. (talk) 22:40, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

The rest of your uploads...
...is up for deletion at Possibly_unfree_files/2011_July_27. --Martin H. (talk) 17:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Leopard 2 Evolution.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Leopard 2 Evolution.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Annual_income_in_mexico.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Annual_income_in_mexico.png#Hoax?

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Annual income in mexico.png
Thanks for uploading File:Annual income in mexico.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 15:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lanix SHX-705 LED television.jpg


The file File:Lanix SHX-705 LED television.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)