User talk:Rahmana4978

Questionable edits
Hi there, these edits are questionable. Without explanation you removed Baahubali from the list of Tamil-language films, even though it was shot simultaneously in Telugu and Tamil, and even though the community has already decided to list it in the Tamil section. You also changed the gross of Kabali to 600 crore, apparently without reading the reference which is clearly lumping pre-release income into the box office total, and which is citing Financial Express, so they obviously haven't done any independent confirmation. Further, there is a giant wall of discussion on this subject at Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films. Please do not make these changes again until you have achieved consensus by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. And in the future, if you're tempted to make a controversial change to an article, you should check the talk page to see if this is an area of discord. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello, I'm Bonadea. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kabali (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Please read the discussion on the talk page and do not change the information against consensus. bonadea contributions talk 16:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Rahmana, your editing privileges will be revoked if you keep doing this. It's disruptive. If you were to actually read the sources you seem to believe (like this one you submitted when you made these changes,) you would know that 600+ crore is not the money Kabali made from the box office. Whenever we talk about film gross, we're talking about box office income, not income made from box office + other revenue streams. For you to keep adding a number that doesn't reflect just the box office income is either: A) a good-faith mistake, in which case you need to stop making it, please, now that you've been educated or B) a deliberate attempt to inflate reports of Kabali's success. There's also the matter of Financial Express's reports being highly questionable, as explained at Kabali (film), and as discussed on the article's talk page. It looks a lot like they're fabricating data. You should participate in the discussion, but if you keep adding these inflated values without consensus to do so, I will interrupt your editing privileges. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Blogs as references
We do not use blogs as references. These edits are supported by blogs. Familiarize yourself with our reliable sources guidelines quickly, please. We are only interested in what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say. And, as previously noted, there are a number of discussions about this issue on the article's talk page. You've participated in none of them. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:15, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kabali (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Diffs: As previously noted, we don't use faceless blogs as references. '' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:05, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Inflation of Kabali gross
Hi, re: these edits, please stop inflating the Kabali box office figures until the data solidifies and other reliable sources have performed their own analyses. So far the only reliable source that's printing absurdly high box office values is Financial Express/Indian Express, and they are adding pre-release income to the total, which is never done when calculating box office income. See this article where they clearly say "To add to its overall tally, Kabali had earned rs 200 crore before its release with deals such as music and satellite rights." IBT and Firstpost have called the figures "fake". We are not in any hurry to post high numbers, and your repeated attempts to inflate the gross values to these questionable, astronomical numbers, especially when you don't seem to be reading the articles for context, is disruptive. Additionally, you removed a reference for the budget, which is disruptive. If you wish to discuss the matter, you're free to do so at either Talk:Kabali (film) or Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:34, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:13, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

For this. Unexplained removal of sourced content. When your block expires, you need to start using clear edit summaries to explain your edits, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Kabali (film). If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

For removing protection templates from several protected pages. And you are still not using edit summaries. bonadea'' contributions talk 08:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism, as you did at Theri (film). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

For this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)