User talk:Rahmspeed

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article CASA of Maryland, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bento00 (talk) 21:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Whoa! Who are you and why did you undo my edits? You are assuming that the information already present in this article is is correct, which is an assumption. I was merely giving full disclosure and correctly wording what was there. Please state your authorization to undo my edits, and put them back, as you are essentially editing without citing content for your edits as well. Rahmspeed (talk) 22:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to CASA of Maryland. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Your recent changes promoted a particular political point of view, and were not supported by citations, and therefore have been reverted. Please feel free to discuss these changes on the article's talk page.

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Atlas Shrugged: Part II". Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 22:15, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Rahmspeed for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Greatuser (talk) 14:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

RT audience ratings at Atlas Shrugged: Part II
As is clear from the discussion at Talk:Atlas_Shrugged:_Part_II, there is no consensus to include the Rotten Tomatoes audience ratings in the article. Despite this, and despite the fact that the article was protected because of this matter you have proceeded with restoring this content. Please REFRAIN from doing so, I will have no choice but to report you at WP:AN3. I don't want to do that, but repeatedly restoring disputed content is not acceptable. Betty Logan (talk) 17:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Replacing citations with embedded links
I have reverted your most recent edit to Atlas Shrugged: Part II since you replaced inline citations with embedded links which is strongly discourage (see Citing sources). If you wish to add further sources to the article please use an appropriate referencing format. Betty Logan (talk) 03:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)