User talk:Rahularch

Welcome
Welcome!

Dear Rahularch, Wikipedia's criteria for Notability of Academics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) are:

1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. 2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. 3. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g., the IEEE). 4. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. 5. The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research (or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon). 6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society. 7. The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity. 8. The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area. 9. The person is in a field of literature (e.g., writer or poet) or the fine arts (e.g., musician, composer, artist), and meets the standards for notability in that art, such as WP:CREATIVE or WP:MUSIC.

I thank you for your time and effort in trying to make Wikipedia a better place. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aravindreddy96 (talk • contribs) 05:50, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Rahularch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Ravi Gomatam. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 11:52, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Hi Muhandes. Thanks for your kind welcome message. I am a wiki fan, and would like to contribute more with each passing day. There is a lot to learn and I think I am making my share of mistake as well. I recently removed the "new article, review needed" banner from the top of Ravi Gomatam page, but on thinking more I feel it might have been better to have some other expert remove it. Can you please advise? If we need to put it back, should I do it, or let some expert do it? And, how long should that banner be kept, some guildeline on when it is appropriate to remove? Rahularch (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I checked the article: no major problem. You may want to check WP:RG. Happy editing, RacconishTk 18:10, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I would recommend that you convert those sources to proper citations:

If you have a source already, this is how to convert it to a proper citation:
 * 1) Go to the citation generator, click the appropriate bubble on the left (news article, website, book, etc.) and fill out as many fields as you can about the source.
 * 2) Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
 * 3) Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like, copy the whole thing).
 * 4) In the Wikipedia article, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you just copied, replacing the original  code with the text you just copied.

Thanks, Samwb123T-C-E 18:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)